The Zohan

...not be put down for what she did.

There is no reason not to, no chance she is innocent.
Girls killed in 'frenzied attack' - Yahoo! News UK

Hang the bitch and be done with her!

Sti-Tom

i agree 100%

GC8WRX

Anything else is a waste of taxpayers money, hang the bitch!

The Dogs B******s

Hanging is the best option,f*ck all the human rights sh*t

Leslie

I think it would concentrate the mind of a possible killer.

Les

Gear Head

iTrader: (2)

I am sorry, but death is far too much of an easy let off for that evil cow. Re-open the Tower of London and put some fear back into the minds of those who ever think of committing such atrocities.

I know the do-gooders of today don't like to hear it, but this is the only way to get through to some people. How long has it been since people had a genuine fear of what punishments could be served out? Too long.

speedking

Tom87

iTrader: (2)

Should be hung, no doubt. And put those 4 scum who plotted to blow up 7 aircraft up with her. Grey Britain indeed.

SwissTony

iTrader: (19)

I was reading this (and the bloody muslim bombers story ) on the way into work this morning.

Appalling and sickening at the same time, really upset my journey reading about how in two separate stories, it just seemed to highlight the issues there exist in this country.

Anyone reading that (and probably after reading the story of the two kids being tortured the other day) might think what is the point in living in this country.

bigsinky

doesn't deserve to live. 2 week trial???? why? waste of money.

serega

I've actually heard of a number of cases where a mother kills her offspring to prove something to the father.
There's some psychological issue where women think of kids as their own property and killing her young seems like a great idea to them if they have alot of hate towards their husband. I know it sounds silly, but there's been alot of research on this, not sure what the syndrome is called though.

The Zohan

Yup there are plenty od doctors out there getting big grants and making names for themelves finding so-called psycological problems.

However the reality is she butchered her children, the very children she should have loved, nurtured and protected and she deserves to die for what she did.

Plain and simple you do not kill kids.

serega

I am guessing you are not fond of psychology as a science then, eh

The Zohan

Nothing to do with being fond of, more to do with people making names foe themselves creating syndromes for stuff really.

Question 1 - do you think she should be put down for what she did, if not why.

Question 2 assuming she does have a disorder Does this excuse or make right what she did?


It seem this day and age the resposibility is taken away for things such as this and replaced by excuses for what they did. responsibility bypassed

Markus

I'm dumbfounded by this story. I like to think that there are some levels unto which human nature will not descend to, but this shows this not to be the case. She has to be of unsound mind, which is unfortunate, as one can see an insanity or diminished responsibility plea being entered by whatever slime happens to represent her (If legal aid, then I'll take back the slime comment as the poor buggers have no choice - if you're representing this excuse for a human being through choice then the comment stands).

If you want to get back at your husband, slash the tires on his car or stick a brick through his window. You don't kill the children, what purpose does that serve.

Death penalty? Instant thought is "hell yeah!", however, on reflection, no, it would be too quick. An eye for an eye might be better, have the scum repeatedly stabbed, them them endure what the children did (one hopes she drugged the children so they'd not wake up when she did this, though I doubt it, in which case, if the kid wakes up screaming then how the hell do you then continue, and THEN go and do the same to the other child).

As a little starter, I'd numb her feet, then slice the bottom of her feet from toe to heel, then let the anesthetic wear off, should result in a little bit of discomfort, then onto the main course, something that would take weeks, perhaps months, all of it would be agonizing. If a blood transfusion is required to continue, happily spend the money to do this, if it prolongs the suffering of this evil woman.

Oh, the human rights groups would be up in arms, however, I'd not consider this thing a human, and thus human rights don't apply.

serega

That answers my question really.

As far as what i think, it's not important for a number of reasons.
But in a case like this all the possibilities must be considered, i can hardly understand why you are so quick to pass judgement.

+Doc+

Death, No Judge or jury required.

The Zohan

and you failed to answer mine...



and now the (almost) fun bit
then you go no to tell me what you think anyway

serega

So i answered your question after all huh ? : )

Gear Head

iTrader: (2)

Just answer the question, it isn't difficult.
Also, do you believe such psychological conditions can be rectified?

serega

It's not a condition so to say, but some people can be more psychologically unstable than others and in state of shock can do terrible things.
Like when enraged, some blokes may very well kill a person and only realise it after they have done it. Same applies here, when a woman with an unstable mind is very angry and alot of that anger is aimed towards her husband she can do such a terrible thing.
I bet she is feeling like **** now though.

Gear Head

iTrader: (2)

We put aggressive dogs down.

Why should those of us that are decent people who work, pay taxes, love and look after our families have to live in a society that allow people with 'unstable' minds to walk free. Please explain this.

Bubba po

daddyscoob

I bet she is feeling like **** now though.[/QUOTE]


Hey thats all right then she feels ****ty about it. No problem tell her not to do it again that should do it.

Get a life - children with all their lives ahead of them are DEAD !!!!! FFS stop being a **** jockey.

Agree with putting the sad bitch down but don't believe it will stop this type of thing happening again.

There had my say

Martin2005

Plain and simple you do not kill kids.[/quote]


Or anyone at all for that matter, hence you cannot have a death penalty

daddyscoob

Or anyone at all for that matter, hence you cannot have a death penalty[/QUOTE]

So your answer for her punishment would be ???? Lock her up give her a TV poss a Wii let her interact with others........ eat drink be merry. Christmas dinner on Xmas day etc etc......... And her kids get what ???????? f**k all cos she killed them.

Bubba po

Either it's wrong to kill or it isn't. You can't have both.

Martin2005

[/QUOTE]

Well because someone doesn't agree with the death penalty doesn't somehow automatically mean they want the convicted to have a party in prison. Why does it have to be death or the 'life of Reilly'.

Whatever we do cannot bring back those kids, nothing, no matter what way you kill her however painful will do nothing to bring back those kids, prevent any other kid abuse, or make our society one better in any way shape or form.

And ulimately as BP says above if it's wrong to kill....., then we just become big fat hypocrits if we then go ahead and kill the killer.

Bubba po

I wish you bleeders would get your quotes sorted out.

Martin2005

sorted.....i think