American Cover up
#1
Where'd the wreckage of the plane go that hit the pentagon?
You'll need to scroll along.
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero...erreurs_en.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/wor...00/1861977.stm
Why would the US 'fake' a plane hitting the pentagon?
Was the so called plane that hit the pentagon, the one that was reported to be 'shot down' over Pittsburgh?
There were early reports of a truck bomb hitting the pentagon, were these reports actually correct?
This and more conspiracy stuff later on...
You'll need to scroll along.
http://www.asile.org/citoyens/numero...erreurs_en.htm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/wor...00/1861977.stm
Why would the US 'fake' a plane hitting the pentagon?
Was the so called plane that hit the pentagon, the one that was reported to be 'shot down' over Pittsburgh?
There were early reports of a truck bomb hitting the pentagon, were these reports actually correct?
This and more conspiracy stuff later on...
#3
Interesting.
Thinking back, i cant recall anyone on TV saying they saw the plane flying through washington. If you have ever been there you will realise you would have seen that coming, it's a very open city in the centre but surrounded by huge housing estates and slums. You dont see those on TV though.
Whats also surprising is that not one person caught any footage on video of the plane in washington. Washington DC would have been full of tourists with cameras. I would have thought the TV networks would have had cameras outside in washington too as something masive had just occured in NYC and WDC is where all the people in government are.
hmmmmmm
Thinking back, i cant recall anyone on TV saying they saw the plane flying through washington. If you have ever been there you will realise you would have seen that coming, it's a very open city in the centre but surrounded by huge housing estates and slums. You dont see those on TV though.
Whats also surprising is that not one person caught any footage on video of the plane in washington. Washington DC would have been full of tourists with cameras. I would have thought the TV networks would have had cameras outside in washington too as something masive had just occured in NYC and WDC is where all the people in government are.
hmmmmmm
#4
I work with a guy who was in a traffic jam travelling to the pentagon on the day of the crash. He has photo's of the acutal crash and the fire from the freeway, and he said that he say the aircraft fly overhead and then the next minute he heard the crash into the building..
He's got stacks of photo's he took from the freeway..
He's got stacks of photo's he took from the freeway..
#5
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,763
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Didn't they release the flight number? Surely this can be checked as to whether it ever existed in the first place. If it did, then what happened to all of the passengers?
Scarey
mb
Scarey
mb
#6
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Scotchland
Posts: 6,566
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I remember reading in one of our papers that the plane actually collided with a helicopter before it hit the pentagon - given the questions raised in the website maybe it was the helicopter that hit the Pentagon and plane hit somewhere else ? could explain small amount of damage and fuel etc !
Jase
ps I'm not making this up it was definately printed somewhere !
Jase
ps I'm not making this up it was definately printed somewhere !
Trending Topics
#9
The Pentagon is not your average building it is a LOT stronger than a skyscraper. Ever seen the footage of an F4 Phantom being deliberately crashed into a nuclear bunker? It didn't break up into little pieces it vapourised. Look what happened to the planes that hit the twin towers, they didn't break up into large identifiable chunks.
Why did they sand the lawn? Possibly to cover the aviation fuel?
Also, the Pentagon is a very secure place, so they don't want to give out any information about it if at all possible. If you've ever worked in or with people in "Intelligence" you'll know that it's about pieceing together information from lots of little snippets.
As for the moon landings being a hoax, per-leease!! http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/
Why did they sand the lawn? Possibly to cover the aviation fuel?
Also, the Pentagon is a very secure place, so they don't want to give out any information about it if at all possible. If you've ever worked in or with people in "Intelligence" you'll know that it's about pieceing together information from lots of little snippets.
As for the moon landings being a hoax, per-leease!! http://www.redzero.demon.co.uk/moonhoax/
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems to me like it sure wasn't a big boeing that hit the pentagon.
Ever seen an aircraft crash site? Covers square miles.
We are led to believe it hit at ground level. But mimimal scorching of the grass, etc.
Personally, I think a missile hit the Pentagon, but the Powers that be didn't want to terrify the american population any more than they were already with THAT admission.
D
Ever seen an aircraft crash site? Covers square miles.
We are led to believe it hit at ground level. But mimimal scorching of the grass, etc.
Personally, I think a missile hit the Pentagon, but the Powers that be didn't want to terrify the american population any more than they were already with THAT admission.
D
#11
Something definitly was a bit funny about that crash at the pentagon I remember thinking at the time that there was nothing more than "the Pentagon was hit" and a few pictures of a damaged building etc..
Another we will never know for sure situation.
Another we will never know for sure situation.
#14
Scooby Regular
How about the CIA deliberatly flew the 2 planes into the WTC buildings to draw public attention away from the Pentagon, where the secret conspiracy group against Mulder and Scully carried out a controlled explosion in an effort to destroy hard evidence that the earth is about to be taken over by aliens......Mulder was just too close to the truth! coo!
You want the truth? You want the truth? YOU **CAN'T** Handle the truth!
You want the truth? You want the truth? YOU **CAN'T** Handle the truth!
#15
Of course it doesn't address the issue of what happened to the people on
the flight. Presumably killed off by the CIA?
Find the rebuttal at http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
the flight. Presumably killed off by the CIA?
Find the rebuttal at http://www.snopes2.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
#16
I think Prince Phillip was behind the whole thing,set up as a diversion from the attention focussed on the truth about his role in the death of Diana and Dodi. Furthermore, he directed the whole Sept 11th plot from a Command Flying Saucer, held in geostationary orbit over Roswell.
see www.zooog.com for full evidence, including grainy but convincing video footage (2.5 seconds in length).
see www.zooog.com for full evidence, including grainy but convincing video footage (2.5 seconds in length).
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Arborfield, Berkshire
Posts: 12,387
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very interesting - suprised its not been shown before. The question is do you believe the pictures. Ive see quite a lot of these sites and someone with half decent Photoshop skills could make the photos more convincing. Surely the guy taking the pictures of the crash would be the most credible witness.
[Edited by P1Fanatic - 3/10/2002 9:23:01 AM]
[Edited by P1Fanatic - 3/10/2002 9:23:01 AM]
#19
A 'normal' crash site usually involves an aircraft that is almost completely empty of fuel (they usually dump it beforehand if they're going to crash). Also there's usually an attempt to ditch the plane in a controlled fashion.
This was an aircraft fully laden with fuel which was deliberately crashed. There's enough fuel onboard to propel a very heavy airliner 6000 miles -- that's an awful lot of energy to be releasing in one go.
[Edited by carl - 3/12/2002 12:25:00 PM]
This was an aircraft fully laden with fuel which was deliberately crashed. There's enough fuel onboard to propel a very heavy airliner 6000 miles -- that's an awful lot of energy to be releasing in one go.
[Edited by carl - 3/12/2002 12:25:00 PM]
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
Pro-Line Motorsport
Car Parts For Sale
2
29 September 2015 07:36 PM