Speeding ticket.
#1
Speeding ticket.
Me and a mate were driving our cars on a local bypass and overtook an unmarked cop car. We did a u turn at the next roundabout and were soon followed by said copper.
He pulled us over and said he was doing us for excessive speed on a single carriageway.
When sat in his car we asked how fast we had been clocked at he said that he didnt have us clocked as such but had us on camera, we asked to see the video, to which he said we cant and got on his high horse and said he was gonna do us for speeding, dangerous driving and racing.
He eventually changed his mind again and said we could have a fixed penalty notice.
Now this all seems a bit strange to us as he says he has a video but wont show us, says we were speeding but hasnt got us clocked.
Do you think we should call his bluff and see him in court or take the 3 points and thank our lucky stars?
He pulled us over and said he was doing us for excessive speed on a single carriageway.
When sat in his car we asked how fast we had been clocked at he said that he didnt have us clocked as such but had us on camera, we asked to see the video, to which he said we cant and got on his high horse and said he was gonna do us for speeding, dangerous driving and racing.
He eventually changed his mind again and said we could have a fixed penalty notice.
Now this all seems a bit strange to us as he says he has a video but wont show us, says we were speeding but hasnt got us clocked.
Do you think we should call his bluff and see him in court or take the 3 points and thank our lucky stars?
#2
see him in court, in ur defence u have the option to see the proof u were speed either but video or by the speed gun,he has neither so go to court,u will win hands down
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
If you didn't admit to anything and he didn't have any evidence it has been your stupidity in accepting 3 points unless you admitted driving over the speed limit at which point your fecked . Easy to tell if the car had a video camera in it, as it would of been fixed on the dash
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 323bhp.............. Scarborough
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think he's asking what to do rather than telling what he did!
hello mr b bling!!
stevie
Trending Topics
#10
If you didn't admit to anything and he didn't have any evidence it has been your stupidity in accepting 3 points unless you admitted driving over the speed limit at which point your fecked . Easy to tell if the car had a video camera in it, as it would of been fixed on the dash
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 323bhp.............. Scarborough
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my advise (for what its worth!) when they ask if you have your license on you always say no
stevie
#13
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
If it was rolling the cameras pick your speed up as your acclerating away from quite a far distance with superb clairty. So if you were speeding bad and he does have you( they nromally show you the vid) your gonna be well and truelly shafted if you go to court, but if he doesn't have any eveidence and you didn't admit anything you will get off with that with a solicitors help Are you a gambling man
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
I got an sp30 thru the door and I just ignored it as I din't know wether or not to go to court ??? I think I got 6 letter from the police threatening me with instant action if I did not plead guilty to the offence. I think I finally paid it after 4 months and still no court action
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: 323bhp.............. Scarborough
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got an sp30 thru the door and I just ignored it as I din't know wether or not to go to court ??? I think I got 6 letter from the police threatening me with instant action if I did not plead guilty to the offence. I think I finally paid it after 4 months and still no court action
stevie
#16
Too late - you admitted to an offence. End of story. Should have called his bluff.
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Only read the initial post, so sorry if I repeat anyting said.
You didn't say if you were racing, speeding or driving badly/dangeroiusly, so hard to say if you should fight it.
You have no legal right to see the footage of the alleged offence at the scene of the issue of the ticket, and it's up to you if you belive what he said. I assume the officer was alone? If he was, then it's 99.9999999999% sure it is on camera.
From experience I'd never call a bluff where traffic and tickets are concerned as they are issued with the knowledge that you flick a switch when following someone that records everything.
I never issued anything without being safe in court.
You didn't say if you were racing, speeding or driving badly/dangeroiusly, so hard to say if you should fight it.
You have no legal right to see the footage of the alleged offence at the scene of the issue of the ticket, and it's up to you if you belive what he said. I assume the officer was alone? If he was, then it's 99.9999999999% sure it is on camera.
From experience I'd never call a bluff where traffic and tickets are concerned as they are issued with the knowledge that you flick a switch when following someone that records everything.
I never issued anything without being safe in court.
#20
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
No offence, and I'm not trying to be thick here, but were you speeding?
If not, by your own admission, you said you were faced with the choice of go to court, or take the points, and that you were unable to see the footage, why accept the points at all?
If you were not in the wrong here, it doesn't matter if there is a video or not at that time, to a point, as if there is, you are in the clear, if not, they have to prove you were speeding without any evidence to back up their claim. I know that some police are less than honest etc. and that people get shafted, but on your part, I can't understand why you would pretty much admit guilt by accepting this punishment, if you knew you hadn't committed an offence.
If you were caught out, regardless of being shown any footage, then I guess unfortunately it may just be one of those things you have to just put down to experience.
If not, by your own admission, you said you were faced with the choice of go to court, or take the points, and that you were unable to see the footage, why accept the points at all?
If you were not in the wrong here, it doesn't matter if there is a video or not at that time, to a point, as if there is, you are in the clear, if not, they have to prove you were speeding without any evidence to back up their claim. I know that some police are less than honest etc. and that people get shafted, but on your part, I can't understand why you would pretty much admit guilt by accepting this punishment, if you knew you hadn't committed an offence.
If you were caught out, regardless of being shown any footage, then I guess unfortunately it may just be one of those things you have to just put down to experience.
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pot Belly HQ
Posts: 16,694
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I doubt the speed that the officer was travelling at is relevant. But if he had to break the speed limit to to catch you then, through pure logic, you must have been speeding.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Sheffield; Rome of the North
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I realise that: I was presuming that this could only be invoked if the video did indeed contain evidence: do you see what Im getting at? I was under the impression that simple video of you driving along and being stopped would be covered by the act.
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The continuity would be made from the officer's notes being linked to the video and caution, and subsequent FPN being issued.
The there's the issue of equipment being cailibrated, etc - a loophole that has been closed by better houskeeping.
There are still a few driving loopholes left, but not many.
The there's the issue of equipment being cailibrated, etc - a loophole that has been closed by better houskeeping.
There are still a few driving loopholes left, but not many.