Q on Health & Safety at work
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In a village in Hants
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Q on Health & Safety at work
I know there's a few knowledgeable people from different trades on here, so I thought I'd fire this acrcoss as some of you may know the answer or been down this road before....
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ( Do weatherproofs apply to working outside when its raining and are they essential?). Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
Would or should it be the case that they shouldn't be allowed on site say, if they didn't have steel toe capped boots on?
Also if the Employers were aware that one of the employees had no PPE or training and allowed them to carry on working either knowing this and/or turning a blind eye to this, would they be at fault if someone did have an accident on site?
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ( Do weatherproofs apply to working outside when its raining and are they essential?). Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
Would or should it be the case that they shouldn't be allowed on site say, if they didn't have steel toe capped boots on?
Also if the Employers were aware that one of the employees had no PPE or training and allowed them to carry on working either knowing this and/or turning a blind eye to this, would they be at fault if someone did have an accident on site?
#2
I know there's a few knowledgeable people from different trades on here, so I thought I'd fire this acrcoss as some of you may know the answer or been down this road before....
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ( Do weatherproofs apply to working outside when its raining and are they essential?). Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
Would or should it be the case that they shouldn't be allowed on site say, if they didn't have steel toe capped boots on?
Also if the Employers were aware that one of the employees had no PPE or training and allowed them to carry on working either knowing this and/or turning a blind eye to this, would they be at fault if someone did have an accident on site?
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ( Do weatherproofs apply to working outside when its raining and are they essential?). Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
Would or should it be the case that they shouldn't be allowed on site say, if they didn't have steel toe capped boots on?
Also if the Employers were aware that one of the employees had no PPE or training and allowed them to carry on working either knowing this and/or turning a blind eye to this, would they be at fault if someone did have an accident on site?
#3
he Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
should it be the case that they shouldn't be allowed on site say, if they didn't have steel toe capped boots on?
Also if the Employers were aware that one of the employees had no PPE or training and allowed them to carry on working either knowing this and/or turning a blind eye to this, would they be at fault if someone did have an accident on site?
Hope that helps
Paul
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Preston, Lancs.
Posts: 2,977
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know there's a few knowledgeable people from different trades on here, so I thought I'd fire this acrcoss as some of you may know the answer or been down this road before....
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ... Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ... Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
If someone isn't wearing the correct PPE, then they should not be on site.
Should anything happen, the first question asked will be "Why did this employee not have boots on when the MS / RA says they are required?"
Very much so.
#6
Quote:
Originally Posted by 47 NAT
I know there's a few knowledgeable people from different trades on here, so I thought I'd fire this acrcoss as some of you may know the answer or been down this road before....
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ... Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
Both the employer and site manager would be liable to be held at fault for that.
you will find if the employee as signed onto the RA and MS he is liable
Originally Posted by 47 NAT
I know there's a few knowledgeable people from different trades on here, so I thought I'd fire this acrcoss as some of you may know the answer or been down this road before....
If a Method statement & Risk Assessment states, that all people working on a site will be wearing the relevant PPE eg: steel toe capped boots, high visibility jacket/vest, safety helmets, gloves, glasses, ... Would the Employer/Site Manager be at fault if they had not checked that all employees had the relevant PPE or training to work on the site doing that task beforehand?
Both the employer and site manager would be liable to be held at fault for that.
you will find if the employee as signed onto the RA and MS he is liable
#7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In a village in Hants
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks a lot for your info, much appreciated
I asked the question for 2 reasons and mainly because prevention is better than cure
I asked the question for 2 reasons and mainly because prevention is better than cure
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In a village in Hants
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#9
General duties of employees at work.
7. It shall be the duty of every employee while at work
8. No person shall intentionally or recklessly interfere with or misuse anything provided in the interests of health, safety or welfare in pursuance of any of the relevant statutory provisions.
7. It shall be the duty of every employee while at work
- to take reasonable care for the health and safety of himself and of other persons who may be affected by his acts or omissions at work; and
- as regards any duty or requirement imposed on his employer or any other person by or under any of the relevant statutory provisions, to co-operate with him so far as is necessary to enable that duty or requirement to be performed or complied with.
8. No person shall intentionally or recklessly interfere with or misuse anything provided in the interests of health, safety or welfare in pursuance of any of the relevant statutory provisions.
#11
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: RIP Tam.
Posts: 5,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At our firm they have just made the global statement across the whole business that no one is to enter a construction site without PPE, beit office staff or site staff, subcontractors, this even stretches to any official visitors or clients representitives or say it was a supermarket it would be the shop workers too if they had to enter the site for any reason.
Site PPE steel toecaps shoes/boots, Hardhat, High Vis Vest/Coat
And that goes even for meetings in the site cabin.
The first site manager who didn't follow the rule & the contract manager who also let it go, got told off, the next one will be sacked.
Site PPE steel toecaps shoes/boots, Hardhat, High Vis Vest/Coat
And that goes even for meetings in the site cabin.
The first site manager who didn't follow the rule & the contract manager who also let it go, got told off, the next one will be sacked.
#13
Scooby Senior
I think someone needs to take a look at the cowboys throwing some wooden houses up next to us.
10ft off the ground, no hi vis, no hard hats, no scaffolding.
Scary stuff.
10ft off the ground, no hi vis, no hard hats, no scaffolding.
Scary stuff.
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: In a village in Hants
Posts: 1,708
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thats handy to know
Am I ok to PM you?
Don't worry, I won't pretend to be best of friends afterwards, swamp you with messages, telephone calls and tell the whole world we're best of buddies
Could do with just picking your brains a bit more off this bb.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
38
17 July 2016 10:43 PM
aaron_ions
General Technical
1
17 September 2015 10:42 AM