Eventually we will not need traffic cops at all - Lolpopcam - the way forward
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Eventually we will not need traffic cops at all - Lolpopcam - the way forward
'Lollipop' men and women go hi-tech - Yahoo! News UK
I do not agree with jumping or intimidating them in the first place but just how long beofre the traffic cop dissappeared altogether. Their jobs being done by just about everybody else, including crossing wardens!
I want more traffic cops on the raods spotting and stopping the real dangers;
- drunk drivers, not seen a camera who can spot one of those
- Drugged up drivers - ditto
- ****e drivers - ditto
- No Licence - ditto
- No MOT - ditto
- Bald tyres, car in a poor state of repairs
- bad and dangerous driving
- etc, etc.
I am sure some PITA spin merchant will say this frees up traffic cops, ask any and i bet they will agree there is a reduction in numbers/doing other duties as well.
More rubbish, sticking plaster fix-all
I do not agree with jumping or intimidating them in the first place but just how long beofre the traffic cop dissappeared altogether. Their jobs being done by just about everybody else, including crossing wardens!
I want more traffic cops on the raods spotting and stopping the real dangers;
- drunk drivers, not seen a camera who can spot one of those
- Drugged up drivers - ditto
- ****e drivers - ditto
- No Licence - ditto
- No MOT - ditto
- Bald tyres, car in a poor state of repairs
- bad and dangerous driving
- etc, etc.
I am sure some PITA spin merchant will say this frees up traffic cops, ask any and i bet they will agree there is a reduction in numbers/doing other duties as well.
More rubbish, sticking plaster fix-all
Last edited by The Zohan; 01 May 2008 at 03:10 PM.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don;t see anything wrong with this. There has never been traffic police attendance with lollypop corssing - Why should it start now? If it stops lollypop crossing attendants being absused or even killed, then what the problem?
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, now let me think, More traffic cops, less paperwork for cops maybe.
Visible deterrent and one able to do something about a problem when they see it.
Proactive policing not reactive use of cctv cameras
I am no as foolish to think that there is a traffic car ouside each school or on each corner. Moe would reduce the number of bad drivers and incdents -- after a time.
as i mentioned in my initial post cameras do not see a lot of the causes of accidents and problems on the road in the way a trained traffic cop will!
Visible deterrent and one able to do something about a problem when they see it.
Proactive policing not reactive use of cctv cameras
I am no as foolish to think that there is a traffic car ouside each school or on each corner. Moe would reduce the number of bad drivers and incdents -- after a time.
as i mentioned in my initial post cameras do not see a lot of the causes of accidents and problems on the road in the way a trained traffic cop will!
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Oh, now let me think, More traffic cops, less paperwork for cops maybe.
Visible deterrent and one able to do something about a problem when they see it.
Proactive policing not reactive use of cctv cameras
I am no as foolish to think that there is a traffic car ouside each school or on each corner. Moe would reduce the number of bad drivers and incdents -- after a time.
as i mentioned in my initial post cameras do not see a lot of the causes of accidents and problems on the road in the way a trained traffic cop will!
Visible deterrent and one able to do something about a problem when they see it.
Proactive policing not reactive use of cctv cameras
I am no as foolish to think that there is a traffic car ouside each school or on each corner. Moe would reduce the number of bad drivers and incdents -- after a time.
as i mentioned in my initial post cameras do not see a lot of the causes of accidents and problems on the road in the way a trained traffic cop will!
I dunno Paul, if more money were to be spend on additional police, I would prefer them to be on the beat, than policing lollypop crossings that are already in effect policed by lollyop attendants.
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
As stated i do not expect cops to be sat at crossings (unless required to).
We seem to be reactive, on the back foot with policing, not all but it feels that way.
We come back to respect in this day and age - or lack of it. No number of cameras are going to change that.
CCTV lolipop wardens - is more likely to make them a victim IMHO.
#16
Food for thought
Dutch TV news this week showed an article about deaths in hospitals as a result of clinical errors. A shocking number of 1700 annual cases was cited and as a result the medical profession was going to look at ways to better communicate etc. All very nice and cosy really, no major panic.
By way of contrast I Googled the number of fatalities from traffic accidents and got a figure of around 800 per year for Holland.
So why the hell is the establishment focused on dangerous traffic situations and necessary legislation and enforcement measures such as speed cameras and fines then? There is clearly a much more serious problem that needs to be tackled elsewhere.
The UK is not much different it seems - with a quick Google search suggesting 13,000 unnecessary hospital deaths each year and about 3500 traffic fatalities.
I just don't get it.
For info. The Netherlands has a population of around 16Mio compared to 60Mio in the UK.
By way of contrast I Googled the number of fatalities from traffic accidents and got a figure of around 800 per year for Holland.
So why the hell is the establishment focused on dangerous traffic situations and necessary legislation and enforcement measures such as speed cameras and fines then? There is clearly a much more serious problem that needs to be tackled elsewhere.
The UK is not much different it seems - with a quick Google search suggesting 13,000 unnecessary hospital deaths each year and about 3500 traffic fatalities.
I just don't get it.
For info. The Netherlands has a population of around 16Mio compared to 60Mio in the UK.
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Disco, Disco!
Posts: 21,825
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dutch TV news this week showed an article about deaths in hospitals as a result of clinical errors. A shocking number of 1700 annual cases was cited and as a result the medical profession was going to look at ways to better communicate etc. All very nice and cosy really, no major panic.
By way of contrast I Googled the number of fatalities from traffic accidents and got a figure of around 800 per year for Holland.
So why the hell is the establishment focused on dangerous traffic situations and necessary legislation and enforcement measures such as speed cameras and fines then? There is clearly a much more serious problem that needs to be tackled elsewhere.
The UK is not much different it seems - with a quick Google search suggesting 13,000 unnecessary hospital deaths each year and about 3500 traffic fatalities.
I just don't get it.
For info. The Netherlands has a population of around 16Mio compared to 60Mio in the UK.
By way of contrast I Googled the number of fatalities from traffic accidents and got a figure of around 800 per year for Holland.
So why the hell is the establishment focused on dangerous traffic situations and necessary legislation and enforcement measures such as speed cameras and fines then? There is clearly a much more serious problem that needs to be tackled elsewhere.
The UK is not much different it seems - with a quick Google search suggesting 13,000 unnecessary hospital deaths each year and about 3500 traffic fatalities.
I just don't get it.
For info. The Netherlands has a population of around 16Mio compared to 60Mio in the UK.
Interesting comparison Suresh
Call me a cynic, do you think it is keeping the microscope away from the oh so perfect NHS NL have created which has no problems?
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Warrington
Posts: 4,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did these crossing wardens used to note down the registrations of transgressors and report them before the cameras were in place? My guess is that it was all part of the job. They are volunteers after all, and would not be there if it was very dangerous. There has not been an outcry about kids or wardens being injured. Seems to be a solution for a problem that didn't really exist. Now we will have to fund an army of people to review the video evidence and track down the errant drivers.
I suggest as an alternative a very sharp spike on the end of the lollipop which is offered into the road before the warden crosses. Big scratch in the paintwork should be enough to deter all but the most enthusiastic intimidators
Not anti-warden at all, but this seems an expensive non-solution
I suggest as an alternative a very sharp spike on the end of the lollipop which is offered into the road before the warden crosses. Big scratch in the paintwork should be enough to deter all but the most enthusiastic intimidators
Not anti-warden at all, but this seems an expensive non-solution
#19
[QUOTE=speedking;7846239] They are volunteers after all,we will have to fund an army of people to review the video evidence and track down the errant drivers.
QUOTE]
I thought they got paid for the job?
as for video evidence - did you see the cameras on the lollypop? if people are prepared to almost run over wardens (as mentioned in the news) they will probably try to pinch or destroy the camera to get rid of the evidence.
People are prepared to pull down. burn out speed cameras (hooray) that are wired into eleccy supplies and the lolly cams are only going to be powered by a couple of batteries aren't they?
QUOTE]
I thought they got paid for the job?
as for video evidence - did you see the cameras on the lollypop? if people are prepared to almost run over wardens (as mentioned in the news) they will probably try to pinch or destroy the camera to get rid of the evidence.
People are prepared to pull down. burn out speed cameras (hooray) that are wired into eleccy supplies and the lolly cams are only going to be powered by a couple of batteries aren't they?
#20
Personally though, I think its just that the lefties want to control everything (big government is the goal) and personal car ownership with the freedom it offers is anathema to them. Red Ken's hatred of the private motor vehicle is just this. Global warming and CO2 emissions are a 'smokescreen'.
#21
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Worthing..
Posts: 7,575
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#23
#24
One day they won't need any police anymore. Everything we do will be monitored on cameras, even in the home, and we will get automatic on the spot penalties by post which will be automatically removed from our cash deposits. All they will have to to is to monitor the money piling up.
Les
Les
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fatboy_coach
General Technical
15
18 June 2016 03:48 PM
bluebullet29
General Technical
9
05 October 2015 02:17 PM