Financial gifts (Tax implications)
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Financial gifts (Tax implications)
Right.
If someone wants to give a Financial gift to a child and their estate is worth less than the Inheritance tax threshold, is the recipient of the gift still eligible for tax on that gift, if the parent dies within 7 years?
Without wanting to seek legal advise (at this stage) I was wondering if anybody on here knows the implications on gifting money from parent to child.
I'm sure it is only if the parents estate is eligible for Inheritance tax, that they then demand Tax on financial gifts given within the 7 years.
Answers welcome.
If someone wants to give a Financial gift to a child and their estate is worth less than the Inheritance tax threshold, is the recipient of the gift still eligible for tax on that gift, if the parent dies within 7 years?
Without wanting to seek legal advise (at this stage) I was wondering if anybody on here knows the implications on gifting money from parent to child.
I'm sure it is only if the parents estate is eligible for Inheritance tax, that they then demand Tax on financial gifts given within the 7 years.
Answers welcome.
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE15/EC4
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This information is a bit old and I can't guarantee it, but...
A lifetime ("inter vivos" in the jargon) gift is a potentially exempt transfer. If the donor lives another 7 years, it effectively ceases to be part of the donor's estate for IHT purposes. If not, it becomes a taxable transfer, but the IHT rate is reduced depending how much time has passed since the gift was made. If that gift becomes taxable because the donor dies, the normal rules apply I think - eg the nil rate band remains.
IHT falls primarily on the donor. Gifts from income are also exempt from IHT, as are gifts on marriage and a few others. It's normally possible to manage these exemptions a bit.
A lifetime ("inter vivos" in the jargon) gift is a potentially exempt transfer. If the donor lives another 7 years, it effectively ceases to be part of the donor's estate for IHT purposes. If not, it becomes a taxable transfer, but the IHT rate is reduced depending how much time has passed since the gift was made. If that gift becomes taxable because the donor dies, the normal rules apply I think - eg the nil rate band remains.
IHT falls primarily on the donor. Gifts from income are also exempt from IHT, as are gifts on marriage and a few others. It's normally possible to manage these exemptions a bit.
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Here, There, Everywhere
Posts: 10,619
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Assuming no other gifts have been made Mr A could gift £300k to his kid and the kid would still pay no tax within 7 years or after.
The person in receipt of the gift ONLY pays tax if the value of gifts given is MORE than the nil rate band thus the band can not cover them.
So.....give up to £300k and there's no tax for the one who gets the gift and no taper relief is applied or relevant.
The person in receipt of the gift ONLY pays tax if the value of gifts given is MORE than the nil rate band thus the band can not cover them.
So.....give up to £300k and there's no tax for the one who gets the gift and no taper relief is applied or relevant.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: use the Marauder's Map to find out.
Posts: 2,041
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sorry if this is going a bit off-topic, but does the recipient of the gift have any liability for Income Tax? This is assuming that the recipient is a taxpayer.
#7
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Muppetising life
Posts: 15,449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm pretty sure the answer to that question is no. If the gifts were in due to the recipient having carried out some work/services then they would have received a payment rather than a gift. If that were the case then they would have income tax to pay.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Just far enough from sunny Liverpool
Posts: 6,963
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm fairly sure my paretnts have a policy to cover inheritance tax, although I think it reduces every year now due to their age and the fact they haven't increased the premium paid.
In any event, I think they've near enough finished spending my inheritance on such frivolities as heating, electric.... food
In any event, I think they've near enough finished spending my inheritance on such frivolities as heating, electric.... food
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2006
Location: I have ad blocked my rep - so dont waste your time!
Posts: 1,548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
to answer the above.....you pay income tax on income, a gift is a gift - not income....no income tax due.
you can buy insurance to cover the tax on the gift.....but as explained above the tax is only an issue on gifts totaling £300k or more so the policies are rarely needed.
life policies reducing in old age is due to too cheap a plan being sold in the first place. they normally have built in investment to cover the cost of rising premiums in the future.......pay a small premium when you start and theres little investment element - thus a reducing sum assured when you get older unless you dip into your own pocket.
while we are on the subject.......two nil rate bands = £600k so a married couple with an IHT efficient will only pay IHT on their surplus above that - i still see so many people were IHT was paid on estates under £600k because no one was bothered to do a decent will.
you can buy insurance to cover the tax on the gift.....but as explained above the tax is only an issue on gifts totaling £300k or more so the policies are rarely needed.
life policies reducing in old age is due to too cheap a plan being sold in the first place. they normally have built in investment to cover the cost of rising premiums in the future.......pay a small premium when you start and theres little investment element - thus a reducing sum assured when you get older unless you dip into your own pocket.
while we are on the subject.......two nil rate bands = £600k so a married couple with an IHT efficient will only pay IHT on their surplus above that - i still see so many people were IHT was paid on estates under £600k because no one was bothered to do a decent will.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Shall we tell em....who we are???
Posts: 459
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
while we are on the subject.......two nil rate bands = £600k so a married couple with an IHT efficient will only pay IHT on their surplus above that - i still see so many people were IHT was paid on estates under £600k because no one was bothered to do a decent will.
Good job we are here to put them on the straight and narrow.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
blockhead
Subaru Parts
19
07 November 2015 11:50 PM
wilki
Non Car Related Items For sale
0
17 September 2015 11:00 AM