A sign that nothing's changed ....
18 May 2007, 06:38 PM
#1
Guest
Posts: n/a
A sign that nothing's changed ....
.... in the brave new world of Nu Labia, where the mantra is 'do as I say, not as I do' ....
BBC NEWS | Politics | Brown will not block secrecy bid
"Gordon Brown has rejected calls to block a controversial move by MPs to get out of freedom of information laws"
and later "... Mr Brown, who takes over as Labour leader and prime minister next month, has pledged more "open" politics" ....
As I said, nothing changes. However, *IF* things change greatly, were the *changes8 in the Labour manifesto at the last election? If not then there needs to be a general election as he/Nu Labia don't have a mandate. Not that that will change anything ...
Dave
BBC NEWS | Politics | Brown will not block secrecy bid
"Gordon Brown has rejected calls to block a controversial move by MPs to get out of freedom of information laws"
and later "... Mr Brown, who takes over as Labour leader and prime minister next month, has pledged more "open" politics" ....
As I said, nothing changes. However, *IF* things change greatly, were the *changes8 in the Labour manifesto at the last election? If not then there needs to be a general election as he/Nu Labia don't have a mandate. Not that that will change anything ...
Dave
18 May 2007, 06:57 PM
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"Gordon Brown has rejected calls to block a controversial move by MPs to get out of freedom of information laws"
18 May 2007, 07:03 PM
#3
Besides that - thats another thing today thats REALLY "annoyed me".
How in hell can MP's demand exclusion from FOI, when the Security Service (MI5), Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), the police, and the Armed Forces must comply??
FOI is potentially a serious threat to national security when applied to the organisations I've mentioned - the only reason MP's want it is so that they don't have to admit how much public money they've squandered on expense accounts.
How in hell can MP's demand exclusion from FOI, when the Security Service (MI5), Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), the police, and the Armed Forces must comply??
FOI is potentially a serious threat to national security when applied to the organisations I've mentioned - the only reason MP's want it is so that they don't have to admit how much public money they've squandered on expense accounts.
18 May 2007, 07:46 PM
#5
Besides that - thats another thing today thats REALLY "annoyed me".
How in hell can MP's demand exclusion from FOI, when the Security Service (MI5), Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), the police, and the Armed Forces must comply??
FOI is potentially a serious threat to national security when applied to the organisations I've mentioned - the only reason MP's want it is so that they don't have to admit how much public money they've squandered on expense accounts.
How in hell can MP's demand exclusion from FOI, when the Security Service (MI5), Secret Intelligence Service (MI6), the police, and the Armed Forces must comply??
FOI is potentially a serious threat to national security when applied to the organisations I've mentioned - the only reason MP's want it is so that they don't have to admit how much public money they've squandered on expense accounts.
They need some way to cover up their mistress/rent boy liasons .
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM