Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Hurray - liability admitted!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 20 July 2006, 10:58 AM
  #1  
Scooby Snacks 23
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Scooby Snacks 23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 2,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Hurray - liability admitted!!

About 6 weeks ago, a police dog van reversed in to my wife's S3 and the young officer denied it, saying that she hit him.

The IDR report has just come through confirming that the police van was in reverse travelling at 8mph at the point of impact, so they've admitted full liability! We can finally get a new grill, number plate and have the bumper re-sprayed
Old 20 July 2006, 11:00 AM
  #2  
lightning101
Scooby Regular
 
lightning101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Never do names esp. Joey, spaz or Mong
Posts: 39,688
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Was the officer sacked and fined for perverting the course of justice ?
Old 20 July 2006, 11:01 AM
  #3  
hail-hail
Scooby Regular
 
hail-hail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Whats an IDR report and was the lying barsteward officer diciplined?
Old 20 July 2006, 11:04 AM
  #4  
Reality
BANNED
 
Reality's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Jasey@Work
Posts: 2,507
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

of course the pig wasn't sacked / cautioned or anything else.

Laws are for us not them!

Old 20 July 2006, 11:09 AM
  #5  
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Butty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY06 STi Spec D
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

How did they work out the car was going in reverse?

Did you bribe the alsatian with steak to grass the liar up?

nick
Old 20 July 2006, 11:15 AM
  #6  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks 23
The IDR report has just come through confirming that the police van was in reverse travelling at 8mph at the point of impact, so they've admitted full liability!
Personally I'd say your case has only just started if the shít of a police officer (Or anybody for that matter), tried to say otherwise and was then proved to be lying.
Old 20 July 2006, 11:15 AM
  #7  
Gordo
Scooby Regular
 
Gordo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if a back light breaks, you can tell the brake light was lit at the time from the residue (apparently!)
Old 20 July 2006, 11:22 AM
  #8  
Longjing
Scooby Regular
 
Longjing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SE15/EC4
Posts: 392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Inspection discrepancy report?

Good result anyway.
Old 20 July 2006, 11:49 AM
  #9  
MattW
Scooby Regular
 
MattW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,021
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some sort of blackbox monitoring the dog van would be my guess.
Old 20 July 2006, 11:50 AM
  #10  
midget1500
Scooby Regular
 
midget1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bangor, Northern Ireland
Posts: 2,033
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well, if the young officer lied about something minor like that...i wouldn't want him on the force!
Old 20 July 2006, 11:55 AM
  #11  
Wish
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Wish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 3,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yep, Thats shocking !!!!
Old 20 July 2006, 12:05 PM
  #12  
Scooby Snacks 23
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Scooby Snacks 23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 2,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Full story was after the police van reversed into her, my wife got out of her car but the officer driving didn't for a good half a minute. She's a bit of a hothead so she was screaming at him to get out. As soon as he got out he accused her of driving into him and was generally threatening (nothing frightens her though!). She demanded he call a senior officer. When his sargeant arrived, the police officer strenuously denied reversing but being driven into by my wife. The sarge took the details down and my wife made it known that he took a while to get out of the car.

I went to the police station with my wife that night (she got a producer) and she made a formal complaint about his threatening behavouir. A senior officer then told us that all police vehicles have an IDR machine which is activated upon impact - it then records the last 45 seconds of the car's activity (speed, gear, etc). If it's not activated because the impact is not severe enough, the driver can manually start it by pressing a button, so the report would clearly show who was lying.

It was then that we understood why he didn't get out of the car - he was no doubt waiting for the 45 seconds to be up before pressing the button manually - this way, his car would be stationary and he would be in the clear.

Anyway, after 6 weeks of phonecalls, the IDR report has now been received confirming that he was in reverse and he hit her.

As for the officer himself, I'm not sure what happens to him. The fact that she made a formal complaint about him and the fact that it's now been proved that he was lying, he must be in trouble, surely?????
Old 20 July 2006, 12:09 PM
  #13  
Wolfsburger
Scooby Newbie
 
Wolfsburger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks 23
As for the officer himself, I'm not sure what happens to him. The fact that she made a formal complaint about him and the fact that it's now been proved that he was lying, he must be in trouble, surely?????
Promotion beckons probably..................
Old 20 July 2006, 12:10 PM
  #14  
camk
Scooby Regular
 
camk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 1,764
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

must be an idiot, why lie about something like that, seems crazy. Anyone could make that mistake and reverse into someone but to try and cover it up and then try to blame someone else needs a strange mindset.
Old 20 July 2006, 12:11 PM
  #15  
gpssti4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
gpssti4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Deepest Darkest Kernow
Posts: 4,404
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Let's hope he gets what's coming to him. We don't need that kind of police officer dishing out his kind of law.

Old 20 July 2006, 12:15 PM
  #16  
Wish
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Wish's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 3,905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Like you say, reversing in to another car is no big deal. Why Lie ???

Its the Lies that are worse than the accident ???
Old 20 July 2006, 12:31 PM
  #17  
Spoon
Scooby Regular
 
Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Logged Out
Posts: 10,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks 23
It was then that we understood why he didn't get out of the car - he was no doubt waiting for the 45 seconds
He was probably being noshed off by his dog and was nearing lift-off.
Old 20 July 2006, 12:33 PM
  #18  
Dazza01
Scooby Regular
 
Dazza01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nott'm Home of the Reds
Posts: 6,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by Scooby Snacks 23
A senior officer then told us that all police vehicles have an IDR machine which is activated upon impact - it then records the last 45 seconds of the car's activity (speed, gear, etc). If it's not activated because the impact is not severe enough, the driver can manually start it by pressing a button, so the report would clearly show who was lying.
Excelllent result SS23, be nice to know what happens to him aswell

But this IDR machine puzzles me ? you say it activates upon impact and records the previous 45 seconds of the car's activity, how does it record something that has already happened ? or is it monitoring the vehicle all the time and when activated records the next 45 seconds ?

Last edited by Dazza01; 20 July 2006 at 12:35 PM.
Old 20 July 2006, 12:37 PM
  #19  
druddle
Scooby Regular
 
druddle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Berkshire
Posts: 5,528
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Spoon
He was probably being noshed off by his dog and was nearing lift-off.
Coke - monitor moment. ROTFLMAO......
Old 20 July 2006, 12:44 PM
  #20  
dsmith
Scooby Regular
 
dsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 4,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dazza - I'm sure it actually continually records but can only store 45 sec. At impact it will stop recording (and hence overwriting previous data) - so you have the last 45 secs saved.

With solid state memory laughably cheap now - I'm very surprised its only 45 secs.
Old 20 July 2006, 12:46 PM
  #21  
Scooby Snacks 23
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Scooby Snacks 23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 2,848
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dazza01
Excelllent result SS23, be nice to know what happens to him aswell

But this IDR machine puzzles me ? you say it activates upon impact and records the previous 45 seconds of the car's activity, how does it record something that has already happened ? or is it monitoring the vehicle all the time and when activated records the next 45 seconds ?
No idea how it works, and only stating what the cops told me but would guess that it monitors everything permanently but then stores the last 45 seconds when it's activated. I'm sure we'll get a traffic cop making a comment soon enough
Old 20 July 2006, 12:47 PM
  #22  
dsmith
Scooby Regular
 
dsmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 1999
Posts: 4,518
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

From a quick google

An Incident Data Recorder is a Home Office approved, permanently installed electronic device which can record and store precise driving data relating to a vehicle when the equipment is triggered by a collision, incident or event.

The information recorded includes speed, operation of the brakes, forwards and sideways acceleration, operation of lights and emergency warning equipment (including blue lights and sirens).

Following any impact, the IDR will automatically activate the incident mode and retain 60 seconds of precise information, 40 seconds prior to impact and 20 seconds post impact. The device is capable of storing eight separate incidents within its memory.

The device will also store anything up to 28 days of journey data which will provide detailed information of vehicle usage over that period, including for example harsh braking or excessive speed over a traffic calming hump.

Data from the device is evidence which can safeguard the driving integrity of staff or be used for misconduct and court purposes. A notice inside police vehicles, within the driver’s view, will indicate that the vehicle is fitted with an IDR. The devices cannot record voices in the vehicle.
Old 20 July 2006, 12:48 PM
  #23  
Dazza01
Scooby Regular
 
Dazza01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Nott'm Home of the Reds
Posts: 6,431
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

Originally Posted by dsmith
Dazza - I'm sure it actually continually records but can only store 45 sec. At impact it will stop recording (and hence overwriting previous data) - so you have the last 45 secs saved.
Ah now if i worked days and not nights i would have been more awake and might of thought of that
Old 20 July 2006, 12:59 PM
  #24  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Angry

Originally Posted by camk
must be an idiot, why lie about something like that, seems crazy. Anyone could make that mistake and reverse into someone but to try and cover it up and then try to blame someone else needs a strange mindset.
Nope. Typical copper, I'd say.
Had the same sort of thing done to me, TWICE!
Hint: trust any copper about as far as you could chuck him AND his car!

Alcazar
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Benrowe727
ScoobyNet General
7
28 September 2015 07:05 AM
TylerD529
Lighting and Other Electrical
5
20 September 2015 12:10 PM
Chip
ScoobyNet General
3
01 February 2001 04:39 PM
JohnS
ScoobyNet General
1
03 March 2000 12:53 PM



Quick Reply: Hurray - liability admitted!!



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:32 AM.