16vmarc

Is there any relevance to the films not following in sequence? The first two anyway with Temple being a prequel.

Raiders - 1936

Temple - 1935

Crusade - 1938

brihoppy

im not sure temple of doom is a prequel despite the apparant difference in date...doesnt harrison ford make a reference to the ark of the covenant while he and kate capshaw are creeping around some tunnels in that palace...?! iirc, she asks what an image on a wall is and he tells her 'ark of the covenant, trust me...' indicating hes already seen it...?!

NotoriousREV

Don't know but only just noticed that the nightclub at the beginning of Temple is called Obi Wan. I know everyone else probably already knew this

DJ Dunk

iTrader: (5)

TOD was a prequel to Raiders. Crusade was a prequel to them both as it takes place in 1912 then the late 1930's.

FASTER MIKE!!

are'nt they suposed to be making another one?

16vmarc

Yeah, 2007. Speilberg and Lucas again

Petem95

I really hope they make it a good one. Nothing worse than a lame 4th addition to kill off a good trilogy.

Harrison Ford will be 64/5 when filming this - thats getting on a bit for a role which is quite active, but I think he can pull it off.

Hope they dont leave the door open for further sequals after this one, or worse introduce some sort of Indian Jones kid to carry on the series with....

Simon C

Well lets hope its better than the star wars films the last 3 ruined the first 3 for me, and I grew up with them.

Swen6

No reference i know but i've got the game for my Xbox and it's fookin' ace, so any fans of Indy, get the game.


Oh the films arn't bad either, i keep meaning to buy the box set.