Indiana Jones
 

Is there any relevance to the films not following in sequence? The first two anyway with Temple being a prequel.

Raiders - 1936

Temple - 1935

Crusade - 1938

im not sure temple of doom is a prequel despite the apparant difference in date...doesnt harrison ford make a reference to the ark of the covenant while he and kate capshaw are creeping around some tunnels in that palace...?! iirc, she asks what an image on a wall is and he tells her 'ark of the covenant, trust me...' indicating hes already seen it...?!

Don't know but only just noticed that the nightclub at the beginning of Temple is called Obi Wan. I know everyone else probably already knew this ;)

TOD was a prequel to Raiders. Crusade was a prequel to them both as it takes place in 1912 then the late 1930's.

are'nt they suposed to be making another one?

Yeah, 2007. Speilberg and Lucas again :cool:

I really hope they make it a good one. Nothing worse than a lame 4th addition to kill off a good trilogy.

Harrison Ford will be 64/5 when filming this - thats getting on a bit for a role which is quite active, but I think he can pull it off.

Hope they dont leave the door open for further sequals after this one, or worse introduce some sort of Indian Jones kid to carry on the series with....

They were gonna shoot the fourth one with River Phoenix as a younger indy (he played the young 1912 indy in the third one) but unfortunately he got smacked up and died.

Well lets hope its better than the star wars films the last 3 ruined the first 3 for me, and I grew up with them.

No reference i know but i've got the game for my Xbox and it's fookin' ace, so any fans of Indy, get the game.


Oh the films arn't bad either, i keep meaning to buy the box set.