MOBILE PHONE MASTS
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: RS6 heaven. 505/445 Scooby Eater (whilst watching TV)
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
MOBILE PHONE MASTS
Has anybody any experience of fighting off planning permission for a mobile phone mast.
I returned home last night to find a letter from the council telling me that Orange PLC have applied to erect an 8m high mast not 10m away from the end of my garden!
I have 21 days to object from the date of the letter which was the 14th, so it's taken a week to arrive! Snidey *****
Any advice/experiences would be most appreciated
Phil
I returned home last night to find a letter from the council telling me that Orange PLC have applied to erect an 8m high mast not 10m away from the end of my garden!
I have 21 days to object from the date of the letter which was the 14th, so it's taken a week to arrive! Snidey *****
Any advice/experiences would be most appreciated
Phil
#2
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What is your objection to it? will it look right out of place or is it a 'not in my backyard' type thing? They sometimes put up masks disguised as trees (but dead ones unfortunately)
Local council would be a start.
Local council would be a start.
#4
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: essex, then chongqing, china and now essex again
Posts: 2,568
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i objected to something in epping a while back, right next door to some houses we'd just built. it was a police comms mast which went up without notice so we fought it through the planning process. the planners were pretty slow dealing with the whole thing and eventually issued an enforcement notice. some months later the mast disappeared though.
take a look here - http://www.planning-applications.co.uk/page1.htm (note: there was some really useful info on here about some of the telecomms acts and what rights operators have and what recourse those affected by masts have; but i had a quick look this morning and i can't find it now!! take a look around through - you may have more luck than me)
lots of info on how to deal with this sort of thing. good luck; mast operators have a reputation for playing the system so don't expect to get a quick result.
take a look here - http://www.planning-applications.co.uk/page1.htm (note: there was some really useful info on here about some of the telecomms acts and what rights operators have and what recourse those affected by masts have; but i had a quick look this morning and i can't find it now!! take a look around through - you may have more luck than me)
lots of info on how to deal with this sort of thing. good luck; mast operators have a reputation for playing the system so don't expect to get a quick result.
#5
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: RS6 heaven. 505/445 Scooby Eater (whilst watching TV)
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm not on Orange
I am worried about the health aspects.
It is still not proven that there are no risks from these masts. Although the radiation is less than a mobile phone, I do not go around with it glued to my ear 24/7.
I have a pregnant wife and guidelines say that young children are affected far more than adults and so the masts cannot be near schools.
A child is only in school a few hours a day. They spend far more time at home yet it's ok to put one up at the end of my garden!
I am worried about the health aspects.
It is still not proven that there are no risks from these masts. Although the radiation is less than a mobile phone, I do not go around with it glued to my ear 24/7.
I have a pregnant wife and guidelines say that young children are affected far more than adults and so the masts cannot be near schools.
A child is only in school a few hours a day. They spend far more time at home yet it's ok to put one up at the end of my garden!
#6
Scooby Regular
Had exactly the same thing recently (from Vodafone though !)
Spoke to Kenny (Saxo Boy) (planning officer) and he advised NOT to even bother to object on health grounds as the actual risks are less than you get from your own phone etc etc (plenty info on-line re the actual health risks)
If you want to object then object saying it's unsightly etc....
However he mentioned that the government are very keen to pass these applications (to improve coverage) so it's unlikely you'd succeed.
However.....
You'd be amazed how easily these masts can be taken down (allegedly, and especially very early in the morning with the right type of saw)
Goood luck
Spoke to Kenny (Saxo Boy) (planning officer) and he advised NOT to even bother to object on health grounds as the actual risks are less than you get from your own phone etc etc (plenty info on-line re the actual health risks)
If you want to object then object saying it's unsightly etc....
However he mentioned that the government are very keen to pass these applications (to improve coverage) so it's unlikely you'd succeed.
However.....
You'd be amazed how easily these masts can be taken down (allegedly, and especially very early in the morning with the right type of saw)
Goood luck
#7
What's the problem? It's non-ionizing radiation. We have one at the end of the street. I bet these NIMBYs are the same people who complain to their network operator that they've got crap coverage!
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
My local Orange mast went down last night
I rang them,
The girl on the other end of the phone then told me you would not believe how many masts are hidden inside Macdonalds signs (the golden arches) so Macdonalds kills you two ways these days....
The reason our mast is not fixable right away is they have to get planning permission to get on the site
Just something to add to the debate
I rang them,
The girl on the other end of the phone then told me you would not believe how many masts are hidden inside Macdonalds signs (the golden arches) so Macdonalds kills you two ways these days....
The reason our mast is not fixable right away is they have to get planning permission to get on the site
Just something to add to the debate
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: RS6 heaven. 505/445 Scooby Eater (whilst watching TV)
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
NIMBY??
It's at the end of my garden, not down the end of my street and no doubt wiping a few quid off the value of my house as I certainly wouldn't buy a house with a mast at the back!
It's at the end of my garden, not down the end of my street and no doubt wiping a few quid off the value of my house as I certainly wouldn't buy a house with a mast at the back!
#12
Scooby Regular
It's at the end of my garden, not down the end of my street and no doubt wiping a few quid off the value of my house as I certainly wouldn't buy a house with a mast at the back!
From all the research I have read (quite a bit by the way !) the mast is a lot less harmful
#13
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: England
Posts: 18,358
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Philip Attaway
I am worried about the health aspects.
We objected to an Orange mast being put up in a field disguised as a tree, orange withdrew their application and the re-submitted one situated directly outside a childrens play area. Mercifully that was refused.
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: RS6 heaven. 505/445 Scooby Eater (whilst watching TV)
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But......do you ever use a mobile phone?
From all the research I have read (quite a bit by the way !) the mast is a lot less harmful
The mast is constantly working. I may have a mobile up against my ear for a few minutes now and again but not 24/7
We objected to an Orange mast being put up in a field disguised as a tree, orange withdrew their application and the re-submitted one situated directly outside a childrens play area. Mercifully that was refused.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Philip Attaway
Exactly. Everyone throws their arms in the air when it's near a school or kids play area and it is often refused but not when it's at the end of my garden where in 6 months there will be a little one in the house, as well as all the surrounding neighbours with kids.
Why are you afraid of the mast? what grounds (apart from rumour, heresay, bloke down pub, daily mail etc.) do you have for suspecting harm will come to your kids?
As for 'devaluing' your property, well this 'may' affect it, but by how much? Are you intending on selling soon? Does it really matter in the long run? What if the phone company/council were to compensate you for your 'loss'?
By all means, oppose the mast, but do some proper research to back up your case. Is anyone else affected, other properties etc.? Your case will be better backed up my many others objecting to the same mast.
#17
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: RS6 heaven. 505/445 Scooby Eater (whilst watching TV)
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think you'll find they change the location as it's easier than trying to explain to a load of ignorant parents the fact that their kids aren't in danger. They just won't listen anyway. FFS, most of them have a microwave oven or use a mobile phone (and give them to their kids too!) that produces far more 'pollution' than a mast 20 yards away. I assume they don't take them into town or to maccy dees as well, what with all the masts that are there?
You seem to be unable to grasp the point that I don't live in McDonalds, or a petrol station. That would be my choice to visit. I don't seem to get any choice when one is plonked at the bottom of my garden beaming waves 24/7
Why are you afraid of the mast?
Most people get an Environmental search when they move these days, just like we did 4 months ago which was clear of any such things.
Any future search would show a mast near by. Not that they would need a search as there will be an 8m mast at the end of the garden for them to see in all it's glory.
Which mobile company do you work for then
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Leslie
I think it is totally reasonable not to want a mast that close to your property which is lowering the value of your house and spewing out microwave radiation 24/7.
Les
Les
....says the ex Vulcan bomber (with nuclear payload) pilot
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: house in a street on the earth
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
We've had this a number of times, and the way forward was directed by a local householder who did the usual thing - petition, sample letters to all the neighbours to send etc, and lots of campaigning. We all visited the local parish council meetings (75 people when normal turnout is 10) and this was because of a number of plans submitted by both Vodafone and Orange (although separate masts).
It took time - about a year, but it all went pear shaped in the end. The Orange masts eventually got rejected because the land they were siting it on was not adopted by anyone thus fell into the land of the people, rather than the council and that went away. The Vodafone just went Pete Tong because of the opposition of local people and the anger it caused. I, like others did not want a mast at the end of our road (and we were further away than the main instigator of the campaign) and regardless, I've yet to see any conclusive evidence that says they do not do harm.
It's a bit like telling people in 2020 that mobile phones were bad for you because new technology allows us to measure it now. I'm not taking that chance.
You can beat the gits and get the council to refuse but it depends on the weight of public opinion and all that. I'd certainly not want to give up, but you need to fight. Good luck.
If you search the net, I'm sure you'll find plenty of existing campaigns that people are doing - just tap into those resources.
Andy
It took time - about a year, but it all went pear shaped in the end. The Orange masts eventually got rejected because the land they were siting it on was not adopted by anyone thus fell into the land of the people, rather than the council and that went away. The Vodafone just went Pete Tong because of the opposition of local people and the anger it caused. I, like others did not want a mast at the end of our road (and we were further away than the main instigator of the campaign) and regardless, I've yet to see any conclusive evidence that says they do not do harm.
It's a bit like telling people in 2020 that mobile phones were bad for you because new technology allows us to measure it now. I'm not taking that chance.
You can beat the gits and get the council to refuse but it depends on the weight of public opinion and all that. I'd certainly not want to give up, but you need to fight. Good luck.
If you search the net, I'm sure you'll find plenty of existing campaigns that people are doing - just tap into those resources.
Andy
#20
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: RS6 heaven. 505/445 Scooby Eater (whilst watching TV)
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's a bit like telling people in 2020 that mobile phones were bad for you because new technology allows us to measure it now. I'm not taking that chance.
A talker of sense
Phil
#21
Scooby Regular
#23
The only way it will devalue your house is if enough ignorant luddite nimby's keep whinging on about it. If everyone just accepts that mobile phones need masts and get on with life then having one near your house is no longer a negative thing it's a good thing as you get better coverage.
Admitting to using a mobile phone, however infrequently, while moaning about masts is just like shooting yourself in both feet.......
And of course it's impossible to prove something is safe. What could be proven is if there was any danger, there'd be clusters of whatever around each mast. But there aren't so it isn't.
And no I don't work for one of the mobile companies.
Admitting to using a mobile phone, however infrequently, while moaning about masts is just like shooting yourself in both feet.......
And of course it's impossible to prove something is safe. What could be proven is if there was any danger, there'd be clusters of whatever around each mast. But there aren't so it isn't.
And no I don't work for one of the mobile companies.
#24
Originally Posted by Philip Attaway
Because there is no proof that they definately don't cause any harm
It's like me starting up a campaign in the Daily Mail suggesting a causal link between eating sardines and leukemia. I can't just suggest it and then use as evidence the fact that no-one's proven it's not true...
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you've got the time object to it. If it gets rejected they can move the mast site a few centimetres or change the details slightly and reapply again. It could turn out to be a long drawn out affair, it might not.
This happened to some friends of ours but with wind turbines. They kept objecting, the application kept changing until finally it was passed.
This happened to some friends of ours but with wind turbines. They kept objecting, the application kept changing until finally it was passed.
#26
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: RS6 heaven. 505/445 Scooby Eater (whilst watching TV)
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I still do not want an ugly eye sore at the end of my garden. I already have an ugly Subaru at the front to deal with.
#27
Originally Posted by Philip Attaway
I still do not want an ugly eye sore at the end of my garden. I already have an ugly Subaru at the front to deal with.
Is it actually a proper antenna, or just a little "fill-in" one? If the latter, get them to take down one of the lamp-posts in your street and replace it with one that's got the antenna in it. We have quite a few of those sort around our way.
#28
Haha Brendan,
We were assured that that the weapon did not radiate at all externally until the implosive charges fired and turned it into a "bucket of sunshine". By that time it did not really matter any more!
Ask PSL, he tells us he is an expert on it
Les
We were assured that that the weapon did not radiate at all externally until the implosive charges fired and turned it into a "bucket of sunshine". By that time it did not really matter any more!
Ask PSL, he tells us he is an expert on it
Les
#29
SN Fairy Godmother
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Far Far Away
Posts: 35,246
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I agree with you phil, I would hate it at the bottom of my garden, and I bet most of the council would hate it at the bottom of theirs. They are an eyesore.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
shorty87
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
0
29 September 2015 02:18 PM