BlackadderII

We've all heard the condemnation of terrorist attacks and our country's (and others) voiced unified pledges that "we are now at war with terrorism".

We've also heard major active "terrorist" organisations condemnation of the "infidels" and their total "all out war policies" on us ALL. To reinforce that you only had to listen to that w*nker on the tv the other night who said that the beheading of 2 American oil workers screened on the net was totally acceptable because they were considered the enemy purely for being American nationals.

So, my question is this: Why on earth are we not imposing a state of war on these organisations ie. If they are caught and are known to be actively trying to upset the economy of a country or persuing ideals that will cause the instability of a country can we not shoot the fvckers for being spies. Unless of course they were in uniform, which is a silly suggestion because they hide and skulk and mingle like the dogs that they are!

It would give a much more fervant message to these individuals and make them think twice before they promoted things that would help to de-stabilise our country and give much better powers to the security forces to deal with such matters instead of running around with both arms tied behind their backs.

I watched an article on the news the other night with a couple of "middle eastern" teenagers on who were actively ranting and raving about how the British will pay for their actions against "their muslim community" (they were from Wakefield ffs). In such instances, shouldnt these young gentlemen be arrested and jailed as a matter of national security or more acceptable to me, parachute the fvckers into Baghdad or Afghanistan

Bonehead

Quites simply the ******* who should do whats needed dont have the ***** to sort the situation out