my car accident
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: just simple old me
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
my car accident
last wednesday whilst on way home from work i had approached island , slowed down to approx 20mph on nothing coming from my right i proceeded onto island-not a very big island but not a mini island neither-whilst still on the island a rover car came out of next junction onto island straight in front of me and i braked but couldn't avoid colliding with his back quarter-no one hurt etc as only a low speed crash.He denies it was his fault as he says the road was empty when he pulled out to which i replied road couldn't of been empty otherwise there wouldn't have been a collision-derrrrr-anyway its going thro insurance companies and solicitors-do you think i should be ok as i dont want to have to pay my excess or loose my no claims-damage to his car was about £150 and to mine it wrote it off just found out today (btw i was in an old mondeo value something like £800 ) so whats views? should i be ok and he get blame for accident?
#2
When you say island, I presume you mean roundabout. If so, without independant witnesses, accidents on roundabouts are often a nightmare to prove who is to blame.
Anyway, I wouldn't have thought it would be worth claiming for a car worth 800 quid on increased future premiums alone.
Anyway, I wouldn't have thought it would be worth claiming for a car worth 800 quid on increased future premiums alone.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Home to a T25 and a WRX PPP
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i think the argument here will be that you had priority and right of way already being on island, if he pulled out and you struck his rear quarter not his rear where fault would probably be laid at your door. you need to prove with independent witnesses your priority was ignored by the other driver, personally i think it will be a knock for knock 50;50 claim
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Far Corfe
Posts: 3,618
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sadly if you hit his rear it looks like a rear ender and the guy at the back is always to blame............... however if he pulled infront of you then you have right of way, already being on the island. Sounds very much as though itll be knock for knock as its easy for the insurance companies ........ do you have legal cover?
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: just simple old me
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes i have legal cover and it is going thro solicitors now-when i say i hit his rear quarter i still mean it was on the side tho i hit him and not from behind
Trending Topics
#8
How did you manage to hit something the size of a Rover if you were going less than 20 mph? The back end of a Rover at that... You'd have plenty of time to see it in your peripheral vision, nevermind the amount of time it took to pass in front of you, to stop or avoid it. It sounds to me like you were in fact speeding onto the roundabout and the way was clear when he made his manoeuvre, only for you to come hurtling onto the roundabout and not be able to stop in time.
Just playing Devil's Advocate. This is what he and his insurers will claim.
Just playing Devil's Advocate. This is what he and his insurers will claim.
#9
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
gotta agree with J2S there.... if you wasnt travelling fast for him to pull out you should have had bags of time to slow down/stop/swerve etc to avoid his rear quarter.....
the nature of the accident Id say hes sort of to blame but it does sound highly likely that you was speeding onto the roundabout IMO..... obviously not being there I cant say for sure but it does sound that way....
the nature of the accident Id say hes sort of to blame but it does sound highly likely that you was speeding onto the roundabout IMO..... obviously not being there I cant say for sure but it does sound that way....
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: just simple old me
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if i wa speeding there would have been a lot more damage done to cars then was done-so thats that theory shot in flames-i had been as it happens in a queue of traffic for about 7 miles so had pootled along all that way and as for peripheral vision-cos of there being several lanes there you notice several cars around u moving from lane that runs along the island but bypasses it and as i come onto island im obviously looking to my rite to ensure road is clear-something he didn't do!!!!
Originally Posted by Jap2Scrap
How did you manage to hit something the size of a Rover if you were going less than 20 mph? The back end of a Rover at that... You'd have plenty of time to see it in your peripheral vision, nevermind the amount of time it took to pass in front of you, to stop or avoid it. It sounds to me like you were in fact speeding onto the roundabout and the way was clear when he made his manoeuvre, only for you to come hurtling onto the roundabout and not be able to stop in time.
Just playing Devil's Advocate. This is what he and his insurers will claim.
Just playing Devil's Advocate. This is what he and his insurers will claim.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Location: Location:
Posts: 1,097
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Think carefully about whether it's worth it or not. The insurance companies will get every penny back off you in the next few years, and you'll be declaring this accident for the next 3/5 years depending on insurer. Remember you will have to declare this accident on ALL policies you hold, so your scoob insurance will also increase. It might be better to pay the b'stard the £150 and patch up your £800 car by doing the minimum amount of work to make it road legal and safe (i.e. not reparing every scratch and dent).
#12
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: just simple old me
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
read my other reply-on an old mondeo to only break the bumper-dent a wing slightly and break an indicator proves i wasn't speeding anything faster then about 20 mph or there would have been a lot more damage-would there not
Originally Posted by davegtt
gotta agree with J2S there.... if you wasnt travelling fast for him to pull out you should have had bags of time to slow down/stop/swerve etc to avoid his rear quarter.....
the nature of the accident Id say hes sort of to blame but it does sound highly likely that you was speeding onto the roundabout IMO..... obviously not being there I cant say for sure but it does sound that way....
the nature of the accident Id say hes sort of to blame but it does sound highly likely that you was speeding onto the roundabout IMO..... obviously not being there I cant say for sure but it does sound that way....
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Merseyside
Posts: 610
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok, ignore all these saying you were speeding, it is irrelevant, we always act on the basis that speed cannot be proven in an accident, so even if he says you were it will be disregarded, he has NO proof.
I would say you have a good chance of recovery as damage is frontal on yours and OSR Q on his, so you were clearly on the RAB and he pulled in front of your correctly proceeding vehicle.
I would say you have a good chance of recovery as damage is frontal on yours and OSR Q on his, so you were clearly on the RAB and he pulled in front of your correctly proceeding vehicle.
#14
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: just simple old me
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thank you Ian-thats type of reply i like
Originally Posted by Ian_S
Ok, ignore all these saying you were speeding, it is irrelevant, we always act on the basis that speed cannot be proven in an accident, so even if he says you were it will be disregarded, he has NO proof.
I would say you have a good chance of recovery as damage is frontal on yours and OSR Q on his, so you were clearly on the RAB and he pulled in front of your correctly proceeding vehicle.
I would say you have a good chance of recovery as damage is frontal on yours and OSR Q on his, so you were clearly on the RAB and he pulled in front of your correctly proceeding vehicle.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by UK300-199
Ive been told that if you have a accident on the roundabout its automatically 50 50.
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Manchester
Posts: 365
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lum
Rubbish. I've had 3 roundabout accidents, one was my fault and the other two were the other driver's faut.
I could be wrong.
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South Wales
Posts: 1,386
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by UK300-199
Ok you must have accepted that it was your fault but and the other drivers must have accepted their faults but if you both denied fault then it may be 50 50,im not sure its just something sombody said to me.
I could be wrong.
I could be wrong.
Second one we both denied it, then I got a snotty letter saying "our insured claims that it was entirely your fault but due to the uncertanity we are prepared to offer a 50 50 in these circumstances" I wrote back telling them to get stuffed, how can someone driving into the left hand side of my car on a roundabout posibly be my fault and they gave in and coughed up.
Third one I was rear ended on a roundabout.
#21
Originally Posted by UK300-199
Ok you must have accepted that it was your fault but and the other drivers must have accepted their faults but if you both denied fault then it may be 50 50,im not sure its just something sombody said to me.
I could be wrong.
I could be wrong.
#22
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by UK300-199
Ok you must have accepted that it was your fault but and the other drivers must have accepted their faults but if you both denied fault then it may be 50 50,im not sure its just something sombody said to me.
I could be wrong.
I could be wrong.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ossett2k2
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
15
23 September 2015 09:11 AM
Adam Kindness
ScoobyNet General
0
15 September 2015 03:31 PM