Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Some more "banning" to get your teeth into

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12 May 2005, 12:05 PM
  #1  
Hanslow
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Hanslow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exclamation Some more "banning" to get your teeth into

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4539405.stm

Personally I haven't got a problem with it. I have a hooded top, but never put the hood up. Wonder if I'll be accosted for wearing it with the hood down?

What's next on the ban list?
Old 12 May 2005, 12:09 PM
  #2  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Seems typical to me, rather than tackle the root cause of the problem, i.e. gangs wandering about intimidating people, pick on something that is not going to have much of an effect and will possible have a knock on effect on other people.
Old 12 May 2005, 12:16 PM
  #4  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Strange country we live in

Agree with Olly, why start banning items of clothing, why not get to the real root of why there are gangs of teenagers mugging people? Probably cos they can see which way this country is going so dont have much hope for the future.
Old 12 May 2005, 12:16 PM
  #5  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

"Mr Prescott said hoods were part of an "intimidating" uniform and said he had nearly fallen foul of "happy slapping", where attacks on passers-by are filmed. "

Not to be confused with "happy punching", where attacks on bystanders are filmed, eh John?
Old 12 May 2005, 12:17 PM
  #6  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

PMSL, true
Old 12 May 2005, 12:20 PM
  #7  
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Bubba po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It's because they are the modern-day equivalent of the stocking mask.
Old 12 May 2005, 12:21 PM
  #8  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

It's a good idea.

The use of hooded tops and baseball caps by criminals is purely to help prevent personal identification by witnesses, police and CCTV. Almost every reported thefts/muggings I have read of locally involves the criminals wearing hoods and baseball caps.

Similary - the rule that are used by most banks which don't allow bikers to wear helmets already exists for the same reason.

Obviously, if there were police on the streets and they responded to "non-serious" calls then they wouldn't need to rely so heavily on CCTV footage or witnesses for identification
Old 12 May 2005, 12:24 PM
  #9  
Bubba po
Scooby Regular
 
Bubba po's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cas Vegas
Posts: 60,269
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Talking

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Not to be confused with "happy punching", where attacks on bystanders are filmed, eh John?
As I recall, the Fat, two-Jagged **** was defending himself against an assault... an activity championed by many a user on this forum.
Old 12 May 2005, 12:25 PM
  #10  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
It's because they are the modern-day equivalent of the stocking mask.
But it's like banning stockings because bank robbers use them. It's going to pi$$ of a lot of women who can no not wear stockings.

Plenty of people wear hooded tops / coats with hoods etc. and yet manage to stop themselves from mugging people. I have no doubt the people involved will find some other way of disguising themseleves - scarf for example, while the rest of the law abiding public get inconvenienced yet again because the shopping centre won't put security guards on the doors and have sufficient number patrolling to act as a deterrant.
Old 12 May 2005, 12:27 PM
  #11  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
But it's like banning stockings because bank robbers use them.
The Tories and the judiciary would never let that one onto the statute book
Old 12 May 2005, 12:32 PM
  #12  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
It's a good idea.

The use of hooded tops and baseball caps by criminals is purely to help prevent personal identification by witnesses, police and CCTV. Almost every reported thefts/muggings I have read of locally involves the criminals wearing hoods and baseball caps.

Similary - the rule that are used by most banks which don't allow bikers to wear helmets already exists for the same reason.

Obviously, if there were police on the streets and they responded to "non-serious" calls then they wouldn't need to rely so heavily on CCTV footage or witnesses for identification
But it also means I cant shop at Bluewater if I decide to wear a baseball cap to stop my skinhead burning, so it alienates another group in society.
Old 12 May 2005, 12:34 PM
  #13  
Vegescoob
Scooby Regular
 
Vegescoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So that's my HELLA baseball cap under threat then?
Old 12 May 2005, 12:36 PM
  #14  
ChrisB
Moderator
 
ChrisB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
The Tories and the judiciary would never let that one onto the statute book
Never mind them, think how upset Telboy would be
Old 12 May 2005, 12:41 PM
  #15  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bubba po
It's because they are the modern-day equivalent of the stocking mask.
If you wear it back-to-front maybe
Old 12 May 2005, 12:50 PM
  #16  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ChrisB
Never mind them, think how upset Telboy would be
Yeah, he was my first thought, but I got him already last week, so I went for the "feasibility" aspect instead
Old 12 May 2005, 12:51 PM
  #17  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
But it also means I cant shop at Bluewater if I decide to wear a baseball cap to stop my skinhead burning, so it alienates another group in society.
You could always simply remove it???

Your head won't burn in Bluewater as it's covered.

The sad thing is where I work 90%+ of all street crime is carried out by yoofs either on foot or on bikes, with their hoods up and with the ubiquitous baseball cap.
Old 12 May 2005, 12:53 PM
  #18  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Wouldn't it be better to just ban under 18's from the shopping centre
Old 12 May 2005, 12:59 PM
  #19  
astraboy
Scooby Regular
 
astraboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 9,368
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I agree and disagree on this one.

On the one hand walking through Brixton at night, as I often do to get to a rave and you are confronted by lots of scary looking people, all of whom start conversation with you along the lines of "You want any *Insert stimulant of choice here*?" All of them, bar none are wearing hoodies. All of them. Why? cos there are cameras all over the place but they still want to ply their trade so they wear their hoodies up to conceal their features.

From that perspective, banning them is a good idea.

But.

Once I left a rave at the EQ in Hackney, with no money and no way to get home at 2am.
So I walked. I walked from Hackney to The City going down the A11 mostly, which took me through Stratford, Bow, Stepney and Whitechapel.
Going through there on foot at 2am is a sobering experience, especially when you consider the people I encountered.
How did I get back to The City?
I put my hoody up and looked like I knew where I was going.
Although it might have been in my mind, I got the feeling while I was walking back that I wouldnt have been as "Avoided" as I was, if I didnt have my hoody up.
astraboy.
Old 12 May 2005, 01:10 PM
  #20  
Tiggs
Scooby Regular
 
Tiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yo lot are missing the point...

this has NOTHING to do with muggings (so forget the goverment should do more crap) and NOTHING to do with a culture of banning....its about a business making more money.

Who spends more in the shops? the chav ***** hanging round in a little gang or mum and dad out for a new TV????

will chav ***** still hang around if mum and dad stop shopping...yes

will mum and dad come more if chab ***** arent there...yes.......so get rid of the chavs.....how best to do that? ban what they wear and how they behave.

If you think for a second that they would kick you out for wearing a baseball cap while shopping with your wife and kids then you need to get a hooded top and hang around with others with the same IQ!
Old 12 May 2005, 01:15 PM
  #21  
fatherpierre
Scooby Regular
 
fatherpierre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Surrey/London borders.
Posts: 8,300
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for pointing out our missing of the point

Personally I don't mind this form of attire as it makes my job a little easier
Old 12 May 2005, 01:17 PM
  #22  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dream Weaver
But it also means I cant shop at Bluewater if I decide to wear a baseball cap to stop my skinhead burning, so it alienates another group in society.

Awww diddums, get some SPF30


Since when did they replace the lighting with tubes out of a sunbed?
Old 12 May 2005, 01:20 PM
  #23  
FrenchBoy
Scooby Regular
 
FrenchBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Bucks
Posts: 811
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I must be getting old as this sounds like a good idea to me.

I dont think they're proposing to ban hooded tops per se, more stopping the little ******* from wandering around with their hoods up.
Old 12 May 2005, 01:23 PM
  #24  
Jap2Scrap
Scooby Regular
 
Jap2Scrap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by FrenchBoy
I must be getting old as this sounds like a good idea to me.

I dont think they're proposing to ban hooded tops per se, more stopping the little ******* from wandering around with their hoods up.
Fashion Police then?
Old 12 May 2005, 01:42 PM
  #25  
Vegescoob
Scooby Regular
 
Vegescoob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 4,249
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
yo lot are missing the point...

this has NOTHING to do with muggings (so forget the goverment should do more crap) and NOTHING to do with a culture of banning....its about a business making more money.

Who spends more in the shops? the chav ***** hanging round in a little gang or mum and dad out for a new TV????

will chav ***** still hang around if mum and dad stop shopping...yes

will mum and dad come more if chab ***** arent there...yes.......so get rid of the chavs.....how best to do that? ban what they wear and how they behave.

If you think for a second that they would kick you out for wearing a baseball cap while shopping with your wife and kids then you need to get a hooded top and hang around with others with the same IQ!
Whilst taking your point and appreciating this is private property, they might have to ask all to remove baseball caps otherwise some smart lawyer might be able to sue on behalf of the chavs on some sort of "rights" basis.
Or am I too cynical?
Old 12 May 2005, 01:51 PM
  #26  
OllyK
Scooby Regular
 
OllyK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tiggs
yo lot are missing the point...

this has NOTHING to do with muggings (so forget the goverment should do more crap) and NOTHING to do with a culture of banning....its about a business making more money.

Who spends more in the shops? the chav ***** hanging round in a little gang or mum and dad out for a new TV????

will chav ***** still hang around if mum and dad stop shopping...yes

will mum and dad come more if chab ***** arent there...yes.......so get rid of the chavs.....how best to do that? ban what they wear and how they behave.

If you think for a second that they would kick you out for wearing a baseball cap while shopping with your wife and kids then you need to get a hooded top and hang around with others with the same IQ!
If it's about the yobs (and I hope it is) why not just ban them (the problem) rather than banning the clothes they currently tend to wear and possibly other "innocents" in the process.

How long do you think it will be before they swap the baseball cap and hoodie for a scarf and fedora. Same result in terms of identity concealing, but bypassed the ban. Focus on the bloody problem - the yobs, not what they wear.
Old 12 May 2005, 03:08 PM
  #27  
Dream Weaver
Scooby Regular
 
Dream Weaver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 9,844
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ALi-B
Awww diddums, get some SPF30


Since when did they replace the lighting with tubes out of a sunbed?
Why should I? Its a nightmare rubbing SPF anything into your head. If its hot and I'm going to be outside for a while (Bluewater does have an outside cafe area) I like to wear a cap to stop me getting sunstroke.

I can see the reasoning behind it, but as i've said before when we start banning things (and getting gov't backing) we're on a slippery slope. If they want to stop chavs shopping, then why not ban any sort of performance car from their carpark as well
Old 12 May 2005, 03:49 PM
  #28  
Tiggs
Scooby Regular
 
Tiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by OllyK
If it's about the yobs (and I hope it is) why not just ban them (the problem) rather than banning the clothes they currently tend to wear and possibly other "innocents" in the process.
.

errrr....how?

have a bloke on the door saying "you're a yob...you're not a yob"????

just ban anyone arriving at the car park in an old scoob?

anyone called Wayne?

They have sat down and described the sort they dont want......hoods, caps, aggresive attitude, causing disturbance, etc and drawn up a code to address all of those issues.

Its the same as the police...they can ban Scoobs as such but they can ban speeding, big exhausts and black windows thus solving their problem!
Old 12 May 2005, 05:00 PM
  #30  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

...And film it


Quick Reply: Some more "banning" to get your teeth into



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 AM.