Did Jeremy Clarkson respond...
#1
Did Jeremy Clarkson respond...
Did Jeremy Clarkson respond to the claims from Transport 2000 regarding replacing Top Gear with "Third Gear"?!
If so, does anyone have a link to the text? I have an entry on my blog relating to the "incident" and would really like to post an update but havn't managed to find much
Thanks in advance...
Kelvin.
If so, does anyone have a link to the text? I have an entry on my blog relating to the "incident" and would really like to post an update but havn't managed to find much
Thanks in advance...
Kelvin.
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Runway two seven right.
Posts: 6,652
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
He was one Radio 5 Live and said that they were all "Lentil eating lefties from Islington, who were a bunch of ugly ***ers"
Words to that effect anyway!
Words to that effect anyway!
#6
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: The Terry Crews of moderation. P P P P P P POWER!!
Posts: 18,687
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by FlightMan
He was one Radio 5 Live and said that they were all "Lentil eating lefties from Islington, who were a bunch of ugly ***ers"
Words to that effect anyway!
Words to that effect anyway!
"People with too much time and not enough brain syndrome"
Sometimes I wonder whether -in the light of some of their comments on their forums- they are a serious group at all and not just put there by the government to antagonise people.
Their comment likening Top Gear to a program that teaches Burgulary was an insult to everyone's intelligence! It would have been laughable if Joe Public had have made such a comment, the fact that we pay for these idiots makes my blood boil!
NS04
Trending Topics
#8
Originally Posted by New_scooby_04
It would have been laughable if Joe Public had have made such a comment, the fact that we pay for these idiots makes my blood boil!
Thanks for the pointers by the way guys - i'll keep my eyes peeled for a response from JC on Top Gear then (I can't believe he'll fail to bring it up at some point ). Like the ABD article
K.
#9
Look at it another way:- would you rather those on the other side of the argument were a serious group with well thought out arguments or a bunch of nomarks with laughable arguments?
Best to have a weak, laughable opposition IMHO.
Best to have a weak, laughable opposition IMHO.
#10
Originally Posted by NewLabour
Look at it another way:- would you rather those on the other side of the argument were a serious group with well thought out arguments or a bunch of nomarks with laughable arguments?
Best to have a weak, laughable opposition IMHO.
Best to have a weak, laughable opposition IMHO.
Get a life.
#11
May I suggest you are the one who needs to get a life, following me from post to post across the board like a little doggie, starting polls etc. As far as I'm concerned you are a non-entity, some worthless little tick with an ironic user name and little or no worth.
As it happens I believe completely what I've posted and anyone with an ounce of sense can see having a bunch of maniacs like transport2K only serves to weaken their side of the argument.
As it happens I believe completely what I've posted and anyone with an ounce of sense can see having a bunch of maniacs like transport2K only serves to weaken their side of the argument.
#12
Originally Posted by NewLabour
May I suggest you are the one who needs to get a life, following me from post to post across the board like a little doggie, starting polls etc. As far as I'm concerned you are a non-entity, some worthless little tick with an ironic user name and little or no worth.
As it happens I believe completely what I've posted and anyone with an ounce of sense can see having a bunch of maniacs like transport2K only serves to weaken their side of the argument.
As it happens I believe completely what I've posted and anyone with an ounce of sense can see having a bunch of maniacs like transport2K only serves to weaken their side of the argument.
Take the bait. If you were a fish you'd be caught every time. Dumb f$ck.
#13
The accepted way of getting round the swear filter is to use **** or fvck, stick around for a while longer and you'll learn the ropes.
As for the angling game I'm the one dangling the bait, fresh fish.
As for the angling game I'm the one dangling the bait, fresh fish.
#14
Originally Posted by NewLabour
The accepted way of getting round the swear filter is to use **** or fvck, stick around for a while longer and you'll learn the ropes.
As for the angling game I'm the one dangling the bait, fresh fish.
As for the angling game I'm the one dangling the bait, fresh fish.
I take it back, you ARE a legend.
#15
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
The classic "I'm actually out-doing YOU" reply.
I take it back, you ARE a legend.
I take it back, you ARE a legend.
BTW for max effect you need to get your reply in quickly otherwise it looks like you are actually trying.
#16
Originally Posted by NewLabour
Of course I am, next time keep a civil tongue in your head and I'll consider not bitch slapping you into oblivion.
BTW for max effect you need to get your reply in quickly otherwise it looks like you are actually trying.
BTW for max effect you need to get your reply in quickly otherwise it looks like you are actually trying.
Legend.
#19
Originally Posted by NewLabour
You're learning, well done! Bravo!
SN wouldn't be as comical as it is without users like you ; please - PLEASE keep replying!!! I'm crying here with laughter.
Go on, click that "reply" button!!!!!!!!!! I need another 25 mins entertainment before I head back to my humble abode.
#21
Originally Posted by NewLabour
We aim to please, but in all seriousness transport2K are a joke, be thankful for that.
BTW flattered though I am 'bigman' I really don't require another fan boy.
BTW flattered though I am 'bigman' I really don't require another fan boy.
#24
Originally Posted by NewLabour
Tell me about it.
Sorry for the tardy reply I got distracted by the T+A walking past my office.
Sorry for the tardy reply I got distracted by the T+A walking past my office.
#25
Originally Posted by NewLabour
Hometime- see you tommorrow 'bigman' (PMSL- either a fat **** or some slimy little midget)
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 9,196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ffs "bigman", the post he made about having a weak bunch of nutters as the oposition, was a good one. You've made yourself look jealous that you didn't think it up - and you're making yourself out to be a right div in the threads today.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jonathan Witts
Non Scooby Related
8
03 September 2002 11:43 PM