View Poll Results: Separate forum,yes or no.
yes
6
33.33%
no
8
44.44%
dont care.
4
22.22%
Voters: 18. You may not vote on this poll
How about a separate "general election" forum.
11 February 2005, 02:47 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
How about a separate "general election" forum.
I'd hate NSR to become dominated by political threads in the coming months.
whatdaya reckon?
whatdaya reckon?
Trending Topics
11 February 2005, 03:31 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
Maybe "left wing peasant forum" to separate the ********* from the educated amongst us.
11 February 2005, 03:36 PM
#9
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iain Young
In wich case I guess you'd need a "right wing twit" forum as well....
Council house Labour voters dragging everyone else down.
Labour voters:
Thick
Feminists
Simplistic (unrealistic).
Conservative voters:
Educated (twits, possibly yes)
Respectable
Have morals
Have standards.
11 February 2005, 03:44 PM
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
2 out of those 3 words were correct.
Council house Labour voters dragging everyone else down.
Labour voters:
Thick
Feminists
Simplistic (unrealistic).
Conservative voters:
Educated (twits, possibly yes)
Respectable
Have morals
Have standards.
Council house Labour voters dragging everyone else down.
Labour voters:
Thick
Feminists
Simplistic (unrealistic).
Conservative voters:
Educated (twits, possibly yes)
Respectable
Have morals
Have standards.
On the conservative side you forgot...
sleezy, power hungry, egotistical businessmen who don't care what happens to the country as long as the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor (or preferably poorer).
As far as I can see, neither Labour or the Cons are particularly worth voting for. Oh for some decent middle ground. It would be nice to be able to choose / vote for a party because you think they are going to do some good rather than having to choose the one you think is going to do least damage...
11 February 2005, 03:44 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Lincolnshire
Posts: 15,623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
2 out of those 3 words were correct.
Council house Labour voters dragging everyone else down.
Labour voters:
Thick
Feminists
Simplistic (unrealistic).
Conservative voters:
Educated (twits, possibly yes)
Respectable
Have morals
Have standards.
Council house Labour voters dragging everyone else down.
Labour voters:
Thick
Feminists
Simplistic (unrealistic).
Conservative voters:
Educated (twits, possibly yes)
Respectable
Have morals
Have standards.
Thanks for increasing the yes vote.
11 February 2005, 03:47 PM
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iain Young
LOL, which conservatives have you been looking at then
On the conservative side you forgot...
sleezy, power hungry, egotistical businessmen who don't care what happens to the country as long as the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor (or preferably poorer).
As far as I can see, neither Labour or the Cons are particularly worth voting for. Oh for some decent middle ground. It would be nice to be able to choose / vote for a party because you think they are going to do some good rather than having to choose the one you think is going to do least damage...
On the conservative side you forgot...
sleezy, power hungry, egotistical businessmen who don't care what happens to the country as long as the rich stay rich and the poor stay poor (or preferably poorer).
As far as I can see, neither Labour or the Cons are particularly worth voting for. Oh for some decent middle ground. It would be nice to be able to choose / vote for a party because you think they are going to do some good rather than having to choose the one you think is going to do least damage...
Simplistic Politics at it's absolute best.
11 February 2005, 03:47 PM
#13
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
2 out of those 3 words were correct.
Council house Labour voters dragging everyone else down.
Labour voters:
Thick
Feminists
Simplistic (unrealistic).
Conservative voters:
Educated (twits, possibly yes)
Respectable
Have morals
Have standards.
Council house Labour voters dragging everyone else down.
Labour voters:
Thick
Feminists
Simplistic (unrealistic).
Conservative voters:
Educated (twits, possibly yes)
Respectable
Have morals
Have standards.
(excluding Moses)
- er... Liberal, the new loony left
UKIP voters:
- Racists
- Mysoginists
Kilroy voters:
- Ex-Monster Raving Loonies
- Perma-Tans
HTH
11 February 2005, 03:50 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
"Rich stay rich and the poor stay poor".
Simplistic Politics at it's absolute best.
Simplistic Politics at it's absolute best.
11 February 2005, 03:51 PM
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Iain Young
Simplistic, but true
Translation - lazy f$cks that don't work deserve to stay poor.
11 February 2005, 03:58 PM
#17
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
Maybe "left wing peasant forum" to separate the ********* from the educated amongst us.
11 February 2005, 03:59 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
I think you'll find it's more like "we all are not equal - but we do have equality of opportunity".
Translation - lazy f$cks that don't work deserve to stay poor.
Translation - lazy f$cks that don't work deserve to stay poor.
However, I disagree that everyone currently has the same level of opportunities. It's a worthy goal, but realistically it's never going to happen, no matter who is in power...
11 February 2005, 04:00 PM
#19
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,227
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would get my vote - I'm bored with the idealistic leftie tossers evangelising about the robbing socialist bunch currently telling us lies. Let them verbally ********** each other in their own forum.
11 February 2005, 04:01 PM
#20
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Swindon, Wiltshire Xbox Gamertag: Gutgouger
Posts: 6,956
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordo
Would get my vote - I'm bored with the idealistic leftie tossers evangelising about the robbing socialist bunch currently telling us lies. Let them verbally ********** each other in their own forum.
11 February 2005, 04:02 PM
#21
I voted yes.
I said at the time CWE shouldn't be scrapped.....
I guess in hindsight a floating forum that can take the overspill from NSR would be a good idea - at the time it was CWE, now as a general election looms an extra forum makes sense and in the future there is probably call for another.
SJ
BTW - CORNER!!
I said at the time CWE shouldn't be scrapped.....
I guess in hindsight a floating forum that can take the overspill from NSR would be a good idea - at the time it was CWE, now as a general election looms an extra forum makes sense and in the future there is probably call for another.
SJ
BTW - CORNER!!
11 February 2005, 04:02 PM
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gordo
Would get my vote - I'm bored with the idealistic leftie tossers evangelising about the robbing socialist bunch currently telling us lies. Let them verbally ********** each other in their own forum.
11 February 2005, 04:04 PM
#23
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,334
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Flatcapdriver
As long as we can put the blue rinse **** right wing brigade in with them, I don't mind.
"Graeme Le Saux" and all his "chums".
11 February 2005, 04:05 PM
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: www.tiovicente.com
Posts: 2,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by TheBigMan
Along with bum bandit lefties that read the Guardian....
"Graeme Le Saux" and all his "chums".
"Graeme Le Saux" and all his "chums".
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post