Link says it all
#1
Link says it all
#3
Originally Posted by darts_aint_sport
It's not as clear cut as that
Two options.
1. They're getting less hard
or
2. The students are getting smarter.
I go for option 1.
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 12,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Be interesting if they all did the Baccalaureate as well and see if the year on year improvements were as marked against that as they against GCSE and A Level.
I think the key here is the % getting A's. They need to rebalance the results against the normal distribution curve otherwise in 10 years everybody will get an A and the whole thing will be worthless, either that or they give the % rather than a grade.
I think the key here is the % getting A's. They need to rebalance the results against the normal distribution curve otherwise in 10 years everybody will get an A and the whole thing will be worthless, either that or they give the % rather than a grade.
Trending Topics
#9
Originally Posted by fast bloke
please do enlighten us
"Exams are getting easier to pass", as in the questions may or may not be as hard as they used to be, but there are more routes these days to get a better grade, by having a modular structure of the course, and being able to retake them if the grade isn't to your liking.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 0-60 in half an hour
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fast bloke
please do enlighten us
#11
Originally Posted by darts_aint_sport
How about
Option 3. Exams are easier to pass, with the development of modular courses that can be retaken, instead of the do-or-die single exam
Option 3. Exams are easier to pass, with the development of modular courses that can be retaken, instead of the do-or-die single exam
Subjects are more modular these days but they don't get "that little bit more modular" every single year.
#12
Originally Posted by OllyK
Be interesting if they all did the Baccalaureate as well and see if the year on year improvements were as marked against that as they against GCSE and A Level.
I think the key here is the % getting A's. They need to rebalance the results against the normal distribution curve otherwise in 10 years everybody will get an A and the whole thing will be worthless, either that or they give the % rather than a grade.
I think the key here is the % getting A's. They need to rebalance the results against the normal distribution curve otherwise in 10 years everybody will get an A and the whole thing will be worthless, either that or they give the % rather than a grade.
It would be nice and specific. Saving arguments like "we both got C's but mine was a better C" type ****.
2 people could get 'C', 1 could get nearly a 'D', the other nearly a B. There is a notable difference in the result of the exam yet both brats get credited with the same score. That sucks.
Last edited by Senior_AP; 19 August 2004 at 01:13 PM.
#13
I didn't say they are p!ss easy. I said they are not as hard as they used to be. The same was true for students passing A levels in 1989. An 'average' A level student would get three grade c's or better. My brother in law did his A levels in 1971. He got the best grades in the school (same school as me) one C and two D's. This was enough to get him into veterinary medicine with no trouble. In 1989, the requirement for veterinary medicine was 4 A's. Now 4 A's probably wouldn't even get you an interview.
I agree that most people work their nads off for two years to get a string of A's, but I would suggest that I worked as hard to get a B and two C's and my bro-in-law worked harder to get his grades.
I agree that most people work their nads off for two years to get a string of A's, but I would suggest that I worked as hard to get a B and two C's and my bro-in-law worked harder to get his grades.
#14
Originally Posted by weapon69
Well all i have to say is i hope no one's kids on SN got there exam results today because they probably worked extremely hard for their grades and for you to turn round and say, everyone knows they're p!ss easy would be quite disheartening
I don't think anybody has said that.
I did A-levels and I have the self confidence to admit they are getting easier. I've no complex about it. Not my choice but I'm not blind to the facts.
Any grade at A-level shows intelligence. They're getting less hard does not mean they are a generic "piece of ****".
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Fairy Tokens = 9
Posts: 1,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
of course the other flip is that students are taking generally easier subjects... media studies, being a relatively new subject is easier than say physics... therefore in the past a student may have left school at 16 because the thought of doing maths and english at a level is a bit scary..
Whereas nowadays, they can take media and psychology and do relatively well.
Whereas nowadays, they can take media and psychology and do relatively well.
#17
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: 0-60 in half an hour
Posts: 1,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
IMO they are getting easier in the way they take them. I did my a levels before they introduced a/s then a level and so 2 years work was crammed into 4 exams or whatever at the end of 2years. Now they learn 9months of stuff, take an exam, forget about all that and do another 9months and then take an exam to make the A Level. I took an a/s level and found it easier than doing what i had to do before. But the point is, they still have to learn and study you can't just turn up once in a blue moon then get an A grade!
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surviving as a soldier of fortune on the Los Angeles underground...
Posts: 7,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think that the exams are getting easier but I also think that older folk that did exmas years ago are just griping that the younger generation have done better than they did.
#20
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Next door to the WiFi connection
Posts: 16,293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ever thought that the level of schooling/teaching has got better?
its something else to consider rather than looking at either
a. Students and
b. the actual exam
its something else to consider rather than looking at either
a. Students and
b. the actual exam
#21
I am not 'old' by any means. A mere 4 years difference between me and my older bro. I looked at his coursework and appreciated it was harder.
My grades mean less, quite possibly, they still hold value...I hope so. My exams were easier.....yes.
Amen to being a realist.
My grades mean less, quite possibly, they still hold value...I hope so. My exams were easier.....yes.
Amen to being a realist.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And school standards minister David Miliband, despite denying any "dumbing down" of A-Levels, is considering asking students to sit a 4,000-word essay on top of the exam.
The essay, which would not be marked, would be available to universities and colleges so they could differentiate between the ablest pupils.
The essay, which would not be marked, would be available to universities and colleges so they could differentiate between the ablest pupils.
FFS is there no end to New Labour's twisting and turning and spinning and lieing. Where will it all end??
UB
#23
Originally Posted by Senior_AP
I am not 'old' by any means. A mere 4 years difference between me and my older bro. I looked at his coursework and appreciated it was harder.
My grades mean less, quite possibly, they still hold value...I hope so. My exams were easier.....yes.
Amen to being a realist.
My grades mean less, quite possibly, they still hold value...I hope so. My exams were easier.....yes.
Amen to being a realist.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
But I thought that's what *exams* were supposed to do.
FFS is there no end to New Labour's twisting and turning and spinning and lieing. Where will it all end??
UB
FFS is there no end to New Labour's twisting and turning and spinning and lieing. Where will it all end??
UB
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Talk to the hand....
Posts: 13,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Andrew Dixon
Haven't grades been improving year-on-year for the past 20 or so years? I didn't realise NL's 'influence' was so powerful as to be able to travel back through time!
#26
Jeez - UB - I thought you must have been sick today or something
The exams have been getting easier to get higher grades in for at least 30 years, but I would have to agree with UB about the spin applied to this
The exams have been getting easier to get higher grades in for at least 30 years, but I would have to agree with UB about the spin applied to this
#27
Originally Posted by davegtt
ever thought that the level of schooling/teaching has got better?
its something else to consider rather than looking at either
a. Students and
b. the actual exam
its something else to consider rather than looking at either
a. Students and
b. the actual exam
This whole thread relates to the "slipping standards" poll I did, to which a massive majority 92%) agreed that things are getting worse.
Exams are les tough, maybe the curriculum itself. In this day and age everyone must "be seen" to be doing well irrespective of whether they are or not.
#28
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Manchester
Posts: 665
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by unclebuck
You're missing the point. The exams are now so dumbed down that they no longer indicate students levels of ability. Therefore an extra unmarked paper will be written by students to determine their ability. This *is* a New Labour invention. You can't pin this on Thatcher. You will just *have* to take some responsibility for once.
What was it you were referring to as a New Labour invention? The additional exam papers?
Is this whole thing not also something to do with the change in the way grades are awarded (not sure when this actually happened). In the past it was percentage based - no matter how good (or bad) a year performed, only a certain percentage would get each grade - whereas now it is based on getting above a certain mark - which is why we are now seeing lots more grade As? Is this a fairer system?
#29
Originally Posted by Senior_AP
Teachers spend more time dealing with f$ckwits instead of actual teaching.
This whole thread relates to the "slipping standards" poll I did, to which a massive majority 92%) agreed that things are getting worse.
Exams are les tough, maybe the curriculum itself. In this day and age everyone must "be seen" to be doing well irrespective of whether they are or not.
This whole thread relates to the "slipping standards" poll I did, to which a massive majority 92%) agreed that things are getting worse.
Exams are les tough, maybe the curriculum itself. In this day and age everyone must "be seen" to be doing well irrespective of whether they are or not.
If standards were higher before your time AP, how did you do at A level?
#30
Originally Posted by darts_aint_sport
All three of the lines you just wrote are unproven and speculation.
If standards were higher before your time AP, how did you do at A level?
If standards were higher before your time AP, how did you do at A level?
Listen, one final time....You cannot quantify or substantiate EVERYTHING you say with evidence. I got 2 C's at A-Level in Politics and Economics. I did minimal revision (lazy). My brother, 4 years my senior got a 'B' in Sports Science and a 'C' in economics. I looked at his coursework in economics (our shared subject) and was alot tougher. So, I speak from personal experience. ok????
White is white.....no it aint, Darts_aint_sport will disagree just for the sake of it.
Last edited by Senior_AP; 19 August 2004 at 03:46 PM.