compulsory random d&a testing @ work
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
compulsory random d&a testing @ work
due to safety critical working regulations. just had to get rid of someone as they refused a random test. had been out drinking until late, apparently.
feel sh*t now - seems harsh as he is a nice bloke and a good worker.
feel sh*t now - seems harsh as he is a nice bloke and a good worker.
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
What would have happened if he'd accepted and tested positive? Instant dismissal, or a written warning?
Seems odd that he opted to refuse and therefore got sacked, it suggested he had nothing to lose.
Seems odd that he opted to refuse and therefore got sacked, it suggested he had nothing to lose.
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
if he had tested positive he would have been dismissed and unable to work within the industry for five years. same as if he refused. i tried to persuade him to drink loads of water and then go and take his chance, but he didn't want to. at least if he had taken the test he could have cariied on working until the results come through, which takes a few days.
Trending Topics
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
basically cos he knew he was going to fail. the permissable alcohol level is half the current uk driving limit, so if you have been on a big session the night before, it is very likely that you will fail. he shouldn't have turned up for work in the first place.
#10
So if he'd taken a sickie, or even just not turned up for work, he'd have probably got a warning at worst about timekeeping???
As it is, he loses his job, and can't work in the industry for years??
Unless he was doing this all the time and just hoping he'd never get tested, then he's pretty silly for turning up at work KNOWING he would fail a test.
As it is, he loses his job, and can't work in the industry for years??
Unless he was doing this all the time and just hoping he'd never get tested, then he's pretty silly for turning up at work KNOWING he would fail a test.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
At my place of work we don't do random tests but will run a test if we suspect a worker has been on drink or drugs. We also test after an incident or accident.
Lee
Lee
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You might find this report of interest:
http://www.personneltoday.com/pt_new...24416&source=5
There's another survey on the home page.
It's a tough question - I work with lots of HGV drivers so it's a big issue. At the end of the day it's better to stop someone going out over the limit than think of the consequences.
It's easy to say "They knew the score" but can anyone honestly say they've not breached company guidelines at some point (even if it is only internet access for SN... ) Another BA pilot was caught as well last week.
http://www.personneltoday.com/pt_new...24416&source=5
There's another survey on the home page.
It's a tough question - I work with lots of HGV drivers so it's a big issue. At the end of the day it's better to stop someone going out over the limit than think of the consequences.
It's easy to say "They knew the score" but can anyone honestly say they've not breached company guidelines at some point (even if it is only internet access for SN... ) Another BA pilot was caught as well last week.
#13
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by imlach
Unless he was doing this all the time and just hoping he'd never get tested, then he's pretty silly for turning up at work KNOWING he would fail a test.
#14
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ProperCharlie
absolutely. that's why the tests have to be random and staff cannot be notified in advance. obviously, if he knew he was going to be selected for a random test, he wouldn't have turned up.
Was his test totally random and if so how do you chose?
We test workers who look worse for wear, smell of drink etc. but there are no names in the hat style tests.
Lee
#15
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
from DBW's link
unfortunately, the rail industy doesn't really have any truck with the "support for staff who test positive" bit. basically you are out on your ear and that's the end of the matter.
The TUC believes that testing is only appropriate for staff in safety-critical posts and should be part of a comprehensive safety strategy that includes support for staff who test positive, and the report supports this position.
#16
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lee - it was totally random. i use an excel macro to generate however many random numbers i need, and then compare them to staff payroll numbers. whoever's number comes up - they go.
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by Drunken Bungle *****
It's easy to say "They knew the score" but can anyone honestly say they've not breached company guidelines at some point (even if it is only internet access for SN... )
Seems a harsh policy though, I'd have thought a written warning (and perhaps offer or order for counselling) would have been OK for the first offence, and maybe a 5-yr ban for a second. But I don't know exactly what he does.
BA pilots deserve to get the book thrown at them IMHO.
#19
Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
BA pilots deserve to get the book thrown at them IMHO.
None I'd say.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
2 Posts
Originally Posted by imlach
So what is the difference between a pilot with a 200 passengers, or a train driver with 200 passengers?
None I'd say.
None I'd say.
Seriously, I'm close to agreeing with you, but he didn't say he was a driver, I got the impression it was track maintenance.
#23
Originally Posted by Brendan Hughes
Really? When have you seen a train carrying 20 tonnes of fuel fall 30 000 feet?
Seriously, I'm close to agreeing with you, but he didn't say he was a driver, I got the impression it was track maintenance.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Jack City
Posts: 1,500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Seems a harsh policy though, I'd have thought a written warning (and perhaps offer or order for counselling) would have been OK for the first offence, and maybe a 5-yr ban for a second.
#25
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Notts, UK
Posts: 4,935
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Even if he was an electricain or pointsman he still has the ability to cause the deaths of 100's of people.
In my industries past mistakes by an individual has caused the deaths of over 1000 men in one incident. It still happens today in places like China and Russia where safety is not a priority.
Sometimes it's hard on the individual but we must not loose sight of why the rules were introduced
Lee
In my industries past mistakes by an individual has caused the deaths of over 1000 men in one incident. It still happens today in places like China and Russia where safety is not a priority.
Sometimes it's hard on the individual but we must not loose sight of why the rules were introduced
Lee
#29
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The land of Daisies and Bubbles!
Posts: 5,560
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think sacking someone for a first offence is rather harsh. We send them home, give them a warning and take it from there. We also offer counselling if people need it for drug and alcohol problems.