Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related
View Poll Results: Should he stay, or should he go? (with apologies to Joe Strummer)
Stay
19
76.00%
Go
6
24.00%
Voters: 25. You may not vote on this poll

David Westwood: Stay or Go?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 July 2004, 09:10 PM
  #1  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Angry David Westwood: Stay or Go?

So, after a tantrum, some foot stamping & some tampering with the law, the petulant, childish head of the Stasi has got his own spiteful way

My interpretation of the Bichard report was that the Home Office came in for a hell of a lot more criticism than Humberside Police, but the Blind C*nt and his News International poodles have conveniently omitted to publicise that portion of the report. Purely the fact that Blunkett wants him out is enough for me to back him
Old 02 July 2004, 09:43 PM
  #2  
ajm
Scooby Regular
 
ajm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The biosphere
Posts: 7,824
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I am inclined to agree, although in actual fact in the the "Failings" section of the summary the Home Office escapes with:-

51 I believe that PITO, ACPO and the Home Office must share responsibility
for the fact that there is still no national intelligence IT system, nor even a
system which flags up to police forces that there is intelligence held on an
individual by another police force. The failure here contrasts sharply with the
progress made in Scotland.
52 The Home Office should take the lead more effectively than it has during
the past decade, to deliver these priorities. Ultimately, they should be
priorities for the government as a whole and not just one department.
Any leader worth their salt would be accepting responsibility, and ultimately the buck should stop with Blunkett, but typically he has his fall-guy and has forever comitted himself as a coward in the eyes of all that CAN see!

p.s. report d/l here
Old 03 July 2004, 01:46 AM
  #3  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I think you are right ajm, but when do we ever see a politician accepting responsibility when he can find some other poor sucker to take the rap!

Les
Old 03 July 2004, 10:22 AM
  #4  
Scoob99
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Scoob99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Jaguar 3.0 sport now bought, Am loving it!!!!!
Posts: 7,653
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If Holly's father Kevin can understand then I think the guy should be able to keep his job and not be made a scapegoat
Cheers
Colin
Old 03 July 2004, 10:59 AM
  #5  
Pete The Biker
Scooby Regular
 
Pete The Biker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 348
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I haven't been following all this too closely, but am I right in thinking that Cambridgeshire Police never actually asked Humberside Police for a check on Huntley, so the whole thing is rather academic as far as prevention of the Soham murders is concerned?

If I am correct, where are the calls for the resignation of the Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, as this would seem to be the first link in the chain to have failed?

Pete The Biker
Old 03 July 2004, 11:09 AM
  #6  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Pete The Biker
I haven't been following all this too closely, but am I right in thinking that Cambridgeshire Police never actually asked Humberside Police for a check on Huntley, so the whole thing is rather academic as far as prevention of the Soham murders is concerned?

If I am correct, where are the calls for the resignation of the Chief Constable of Cambridgeshire, as this would seem to be the first link in the chain to have failed?

Pete The Biker
From what I can remember (although I could be mistaken), Cambridgeshire never requested the information because the school authorities never asked Cambridgeshire police.
Also Humberside Police were only following then current HO guidelines, remember Huntley had never even been CHARGED, let alone prosecuted & convicted. Therefore prior to Blunkett's attempts to remove the pesky 'innocent until proven guilty' clause, they had no reason to retain that information anyway.

When our Police Service was originally created, it was deliberately kept free from central/political control for the reason that politicians by nature are weak and corruptible. Blunketts current actions are only proving how correct our forefathers were
Old 03 July 2004, 11:45 AM
  #7  
Leslie
Scooby Regular
 
Leslie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 39,877
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wonder if the Home Secretary will resign since since his department was also critcised in the Bichard report!

Les
Old 03 July 2004, 12:26 PM
  #8  
Prince Popeye
BANNED
 
Prince Popeye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Blunkett couldn't just leave it alone could he. He's ruined a man's career for the sake of what??? Make's me mad the way these politicians act like god. Can't we just face that the guy slipped through the net. No one can predict the mind of these sickos. Only after the tragedy do we learn.
Old 03 July 2004, 12:27 PM
  #9  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I said ten years ago that I believed Blunkett to be potentially a very dangerous man, after he was singled out by Roy Hattersley - the man mainly responsible for crippling this country's education system - as being a rising star of the future. I was accused by my then work colleagues (in a closed union shop) of being a bigot (probably true, as I believe in the mass internment of chavs, pikeys and criminals) and of discrimination against the disabled

Unfortunately the Sun & Times buyers of this country have given him ample opportunity to prove me right
Old 03 July 2004, 12:35 PM
  #10  
Nathan L
Scooby Regular
 
Nathan L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 5,502
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CrisPDuk
From what I can remember (although I could be mistaken), Cambridgeshire never requested the information because the school authorities never asked Cambridgeshire police.
Also Humberside Police were only following then current HO guidelines, remember Huntley had never even been CHARGED, let alone prosecuted & convicted. Therefore prior to Blunkett's attempts to remove the pesky 'innocent until proven guilty' clause, they had no reason to retain that information anyway.

When our Police Service was originally created, it was deliberately kept free from central/political control for the reason that politicians by nature are weak and corruptible. Blunketts current actions are only proving how correct our forefathers were
That is as spot on as it gets IMHO.

Nathan..
Old 03 July 2004, 12:37 PM
  #11  
philc
Scooby Regular
 
philc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: NZ
Posts: 767
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

not being in Pommie-land I assumed from the thread heading that this was another poll about kicking some-one out of the Big Brother house.

My bad

Seems from (subsequently) reading the judicial report that unless a person has a criminal conviction there are no clear guidelines about what should / what should not be kept about persons who are 'of interest' (the current term) to the police.

And there also seems a deliberate policy to keep regional police forces separate (as became evident in the '80's when some-one from the Devonshire constabulary was called to investigate alleged corruption in the Met)

In summary, intelligence on persons is flawed if there are no formal convictions and if the person moves to a new district there is little chance of discovery through 'local' knowledge.

Why does that make the Humberside Chief Constable culpable?
Old 03 July 2004, 02:36 PM
  #12  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Thumbs down

Something that hasn't been mentioned here is that Humberside Police have just come out joint rock-bottom in the performance tables too:

Perhaps Westwood could have survived one, but both? I think not:

Alcazar
Old 03 July 2004, 04:49 PM
  #13  
CrisPDuk
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
CrisPDuk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: The Cheshire end of the emasculated Cat & Fiddle
Posts: 9,465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Another use for speed cameras, instant crime figures imrpovement: camera catches 90 people speeding plus police not investigating 10 burglaries still equals a 90% success rate on a government statistics report
Old 03 July 2004, 07:27 PM
  #14  
-=Buzz=-
Scooby Regular
 
-=Buzz=-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What's it got to do with YOU lot?

He's MY Chief Constable, I live in Hull, less than 3 miles from John Prescott. How many of YOU do? So who cares what your opinion of the situation is? :P

I have to put up with the crime that Humberside (which doesn't actually exist any more and hasn't for a number of years - it's back to East Yorks now btw) Police can't/won't solve and don't attend the scenes of...I have to put up with their Scamera partnerships and crazy non-enforcement of traffic laws when applied to the asylum seekers (thank you Max Gold for buying lots of property in Hull and housing 500 single male Kosovans away from your mates in London) that live here and drive around un-taxed and un-insured, run illegal taxis every night, smash up local bars every week (yes I have first hand witnessed all this and it is never reported in the Hull Daily Mail after an agreement with Humberside Police not to report it)........

But I think he should stay and sort it out. And sod David Bucket!



Actually of course your opinions are at least as valid as mine, everyone in the UK has to put up with this farcial PC brigade world we now live in.
Thanks for backing Mr. Westwood
Old 03 July 2004, 10:25 PM
  #15  
alcazar
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
alcazar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Rl'yeh
Posts: 40,781
Received 27 Likes on 25 Posts
Thumbs down

I have to put up with their Scamera partnerships and crazy non-enforcement of traffic laws when applied to the asylum seekers (thank you Max Gold for buying lots of property in Hull and housing 500 single male Kosovans away from your mates in London) that live here and drive around un-taxed and un-insured, run illegal taxis every night, smash up local bars every week (yes I have first hand witnessed all this and it is never reported in the Hull Daily Mail after an agreement with Humberside Police not to report it)........
Funnily enough, we have much the same in Scunny: an armed standoff between Bagladeshis and Iraqui Kurds was at the centre of policing a couple of weeks ago. The result: Humberside police decided to have coffee and biscuits with leaders of the two communities

I wonder if they would invite my lads or me to coffee and biscuits if they went to sort out some Iraquis for messing with white girls? which was what the Bangladeshis objected to?

Humberside Police? Wouldn't pay 'em in washers, but have no choice as the precept is mahoosive

Alcazar
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pkman
Security
7
26 January 2016 09:42 AM
TylerD529
Lighting and Other Electrical
5
20 September 2015 12:10 PM
David Lock
Non Scooby Related
26
12 September 2015 03:40 AM



Quick Reply: David Westwood: Stay or Go?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:13 AM.