Tricky question? - How to weigh something.
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Now showing in Texas....
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tricky question? - How to weigh something.
This may sound a bit strange, but here goes:
Short of cutting the thing off,
how would I tell the weight of say my head, or right arm to a good degree of accuracy (say +/- 3%).
I suppose what I am looking for is a method of dioing this without using the bathroom scales. I'm sure there must be a weigh.
Didn't Archemedes have a way around this type of thing?
Let the wisecracking begin.
C
Short of cutting the thing off,
how would I tell the weight of say my head, or right arm to a good degree of accuracy (say +/- 3%).
I suppose what I am looking for is a method of dioing this without using the bathroom scales. I'm sure there must be a weigh.
Didn't Archemedes have a way around this type of thing?
Let the wisecracking begin.
C
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: JFK/LHR
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You need a human size version of a eureka can
Basically Brim a bucket full of water.
Dunk your head/arm in it and you need to measure how much water gets displaced and pushed out of the bucket(maybe put the bucket in the bath so its collected and you can measure it)
You can then work out from this amount and the original amount in the bucket how mcuh it weighs... sounds incredibly daft- and its probably wrong, but hey....
(Very)Vaguely remembered from school physics lessons.....
Basically Brim a bucket full of water.
Dunk your head/arm in it and you need to measure how much water gets displaced and pushed out of the bucket(maybe put the bucket in the bath so its collected and you can measure it)
You can then work out from this amount and the original amount in the bucket how mcuh it weighs... sounds incredibly daft- and its probably wrong, but hey....
(Very)Vaguely remembered from school physics lessons.....
#4
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you are talking about is displacement, not weight. A 30cm diameter ball of polystyrene will displace the same amount of water as a 30cm diameter ball of gold, so it's volume not weight. The density of the water will not necessarily be the same as what is displacing it, so it is no a reliable method.
I don't know of a way to do this however, I'm sure someone on here will though.
Geezer
I don't know of a way to do this however, I'm sure someone on here will though.
Geezer
#5
Originally Posted by Freak
You need a human size version of a eureka can
Basically Brim a bucket full of water.
Dunk your head/arm in it and you need to measure how much water gets displaced and pushed out of the bucket(maybe put the bucket in the bath so its collected and you can measure it)
You can then work out from this amount and the original amount in the bucket how mcuh it weighs... sounds incredibly daft- and its probably wrong, but hey....
(Very)Vaguely remembered from school physics lessons.....
Basically Brim a bucket full of water.
Dunk your head/arm in it and you need to measure how much water gets displaced and pushed out of the bucket(maybe put the bucket in the bath so its collected and you can measure it)
You can then work out from this amount and the original amount in the bucket how mcuh it weighs... sounds incredibly daft- and its probably wrong, but hey....
(Very)Vaguely remembered from school physics lessons.....
Weight of water displaced = lots
Weight of balloon = bu$$er all
hmmmm...."Houston, we have a problem"
Volumes are equal however, so doing hard sums with relative density of water, air and rubber would give an answer - anyone know the relative density of a head
#7
There's a few ideas here:
http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Weigh...r_20own_20head
I like the one along teh lines of
"Lay your head on a bathroom scale, and then look up really quick to see what it reads. It doesn't work, but its fun to watch someone doing it"
http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Weigh...r_20own_20head
I like the one along teh lines of
"Lay your head on a bathroom scale, and then look up really quick to see what it reads. It doesn't work, but its fun to watch someone doing it"
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: "Comfortably Numb" since Aug 2003
Posts: 17,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Go on a forensics based site they should advise average weights per body part per size/weight of males/females etc, then work on their models.
#10
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Now showing in Texas....
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
nice so far, think I have had a think at all of those. The most obvious to me was the sitting in a bath/head in bucket option, but the arguments already outlined disprove that method. There must be a weigh however to link displacement via the relative mass to give a pretty accurate answer. I'm sure ballistics experts could provide a view on the density of the human head when calculating projectile velocity through that medium etc..)
Interrogating forensic models will give me ball park, but i am looking for a relative degree of accuracy for a specific individuals anatomy (with the usual variables as issues - being 'big boned' etc
These variables area big enough factor to rule out this method.
The half bakery website seems to be addressing the issues but hasn't got there quite yet. Some good ideas though using MRI etc...
Any more for any more?
cheers,
C
Interrogating forensic models will give me ball park, but i am looking for a relative degree of accuracy for a specific individuals anatomy (with the usual variables as issues - being 'big boned' etc
These variables area big enough factor to rule out this method.
The half bakery website seems to be addressing the issues but hasn't got there quite yet. Some good ideas though using MRI etc...
Any more for any more?
cheers,
C
#11
Originally Posted by Geezer
What you are talking about is displacement, not weight. A 30cm diameter ball of polystyrene will displace the same amount of water as a 30cm diameter ball of gold, so it's volume not weight. The density of the water will not necessarily be the same as what is displacing it, so it is no a reliable method.
I don't know of a way to do this however, I'm sure someone on here will though.
Geezer
I don't know of a way to do this however, I'm sure someone on here will though.
Geezer
#12
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Big C
nice so far, think I have had a think at all of those. The most obvious to me was the sitting in a bath/head in bucket option, but the arguments already outlined disprove that method. There must be a weigh however to link displacement via the relative mass to give a pretty accurate answer. I'm sure ballistics experts could provide a view on the density of the human head when calculating projectile velocity through that medium etc..)
Interrogating forensic models will give me ball park, but i am looking for a relative degree of accuracy for a specific individuals anatomy (with the usual variables as issues - being 'big boned' etc
These variables area big enough factor to rule out this method.
The half bakery website seems to be addressing the issues but hasn't got there quite yet. Some good ideas though using MRI etc...
Any more for any more?
cheers,
C
Interrogating forensic models will give me ball park, but i am looking for a relative degree of accuracy for a specific individuals anatomy (with the usual variables as issues - being 'big boned' etc
These variables area big enough factor to rule out this method.
The half bakery website seems to be addressing the issues but hasn't got there quite yet. Some good ideas though using MRI etc...
Any more for any more?
cheers,
C
mate, just accept you have a fat head and get over it!
sorry, can't offer anything constructive
#14
Scooby Senior
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But does 'pretty close' come close enough for his needs? I doubt it. Any given volume of water will not necessarily weigh the same as another anyway, due to differences in temperature. 1m cubed of ice doesn't weigh the same as 1m cubed of water! Weight is determined by gravity, not volume or density.
Geezer
Geezer
#15
Scooby Newbie
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Try drowning...
Assuming this isn't a wind up, then you can use Archimedes principle, which is roughly: an object is buoyed up with a force equal to the weight of the liquid it displaces.
Probably best to read these intructions through to the end to avoid drowning yourself. Oh and if you do that's not my fault
Get a bucket and fill with water.
Weigh bucket
Place head into bucket, displacing water up to your neck.
Take head out of bucket
Re-weigh bucket
Substitute second weight from first weight and you have the weight of your head.
This method works for all limbs, limited only by the size of the bucket you can obtain and your, err, imagination
Cheers,
Rathy, with too much time on my hands.
Probably best to read these intructions through to the end to avoid drowning yourself. Oh and if you do that's not my fault
Get a bucket and fill with water.
Weigh bucket
Place head into bucket, displacing water up to your neck.
Take head out of bucket
Re-weigh bucket
Substitute second weight from first weight and you have the weight of your head.
This method works for all limbs, limited only by the size of the bucket you can obtain and your, err, imagination
Cheers,
Rathy, with too much time on my hands.
#17
Ok to weigh your head, get on scales and weigh your whole body.
Now fill your bath to the brim with water, climb in and put your whole body underwater. Stayunderwater until all the excess water has flowed over the edges and'or disappeared down the overflow.
Climb out the bath, and empty the remaining water with a measuring jug.
You now know how much water you displaced. Divide your bodyweight by the water displaced to give you your body density.
Now you can stuff your head in a bucket of water, measure the volume of water lost and calculate the weight from that by using the density arrived at above.
Now fill your bath to the brim with water, climb in and put your whole body underwater. Stayunderwater until all the excess water has flowed over the edges and'or disappeared down the overflow.
Climb out the bath, and empty the remaining water with a measuring jug.
You now know how much water you displaced. Divide your bodyweight by the water displaced to give you your body density.
Now you can stuff your head in a bucket of water, measure the volume of water lost and calculate the weight from that by using the density arrived at above.
#18
Nahh!
Need to use the equation Force=Mass x Accelleration.
Apply a known force to head , a handy sized baseball bat will do and measure acccelleration of head with accellerometer and hey presto.
I suggest you only do this once and bear in mind destructive testing of humans may be ilegal.
Midlife.....
Need to use the equation Force=Mass x Accelleration.
Apply a known force to head , a handy sized baseball bat will do and measure acccelleration of head with accellerometer and hey presto.
I suggest you only do this once and bear in mind destructive testing of humans may be ilegal.
Midlife.....
#23
Guest
Posts: n/a
Tiggs.. dead right M8.. Displacement theories..Pah !!
Another thought from the baseball bat to the head but this time more scientific! Honestly !
Using the rule of conservation of angular momentum strap the person to a roundabout and spin !! Then get the person to move the head in towards the centre. this involves "work" and the roundabout will spin faster. Knowing the mass of the person , the deflection of the head, and the increase in speed of rotation the mass of the head is obvious !!
Just gotta reduce losses due to friction so best carried out in Absloute Vacuum. err dead human again, but hey..in space no-one can hear you scream !!
Nothing like an A level in Science (1978) to get things sorted
Midlife...
Another thought from the baseball bat to the head but this time more scientific! Honestly !
Using the rule of conservation of angular momentum strap the person to a roundabout and spin !! Then get the person to move the head in towards the centre. this involves "work" and the roundabout will spin faster. Knowing the mass of the person , the deflection of the head, and the increase in speed of rotation the mass of the head is obvious !!
Just gotta reduce losses due to friction so best carried out in Absloute Vacuum. err dead human again, but hey..in space no-one can hear you scream !!
Nothing like an A level in Science (1978) to get things sorted
Midlife...
Last edited by Midlife.....; 11 May 2004 at 10:53 PM.
#24
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This may sound a bit strange, but here goes:
Short of cutting the thing off,
how would I tell the weight of say my head, or right arm to a good degree of accuracy (say +/- 3%).
I suppose what I am looking for is a method of dioing this without using the bathroom scales. I'm sure there must be a weigh.
Didn't Archemedes have a way around this type of thing?
Let the wisecracking begin
Short of cutting the thing off,
how would I tell the weight of say my head, or right arm to a good degree of accuracy (say +/- 3%).
I suppose what I am looking for is a method of dioing this without using the bathroom scales. I'm sure there must be a weigh.
Didn't Archemedes have a way around this type of thing?
Let the wisecracking begin
#25
Ive just done it!
We aren't able to measure the weight of a head directly but we can measure its volume and guess its density on the assumption that the brain, like the rest of the body, is mostly water and we know the density of water at 0 °C.
To measure the volume of the head, virtually bald, I lowered my head into a bucket of water filled to the brim. The water has to be near to 0 °C, so it was bloody cold, I lowered it vertically and crown downwards until the water reached the base of my chin. The water that spilled over the sides of the bucket was collected in a larger bowl in which the bucket was standing in and its volume measured. I repeated this five times and the average volume of water displaced was 4.25 litres, giving an estimate of the weight of a human head at 4.25 kilograms
We aren't able to measure the weight of a head directly but we can measure its volume and guess its density on the assumption that the brain, like the rest of the body, is mostly water and we know the density of water at 0 °C.
To measure the volume of the head, virtually bald, I lowered my head into a bucket of water filled to the brim. The water has to be near to 0 °C, so it was bloody cold, I lowered it vertically and crown downwards until the water reached the base of my chin. The water that spilled over the sides of the bucket was collected in a larger bowl in which the bucket was standing in and its volume measured. I repeated this five times and the average volume of water displaced was 4.25 litres, giving an estimate of the weight of a human head at 4.25 kilograms
#27
Scooby Senior
An adult human cadaver head cut off around vertebra C3, with no hair, weighs somewhere between 4.5 and 5 kg, constituting around 8% of the whole body mass.
Google is handy sometimes
Google is handy sometimes
#28
I'd agree with Atom on this one. The density of various human bits is more or less 1 (kg per litre). Don't worry too much about the temperature of the water though, it's densest at 4oC, and not much different at other temperatures you're likely to stick your head into. Bear in mind also that unless you expel all the air in your cavities, these will count as mass too when doing it by volume. I would suggest some caution in this matter.