Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Tricky question? - How to weigh something.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 May 2004, 03:21 PM
  #1  
Big C
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Now showing in Texas....
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Tricky question? - How to weigh something.

This may sound a bit strange, but here goes:

Short of cutting the thing off,
how would I tell the weight of say my head, or right arm to a good degree of accuracy (say +/- 3%).
I suppose what I am looking for is a method of dioing this without using the bathroom scales. I'm sure there must be a weigh.
Didn't Archemedes have a way around this type of thing?

Let the wisecracking begin.

C
Old 11 May 2004, 03:25 PM
  #2  
corvid
Scooby Regular
 
corvid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If you displace water with your noggin then weigh the water I think that would be the only way - just a guess..
Old 11 May 2004, 03:26 PM
  #3  
Freak
Scooby Regular
 
Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: JFK/LHR
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You need a human size version of a eureka can

Basically Brim a bucket full of water.
Dunk your head/arm in it and you need to measure how much water gets displaced and pushed out of the bucket(maybe put the bucket in the bath so its collected and you can measure it)
You can then work out from this amount and the original amount in the bucket how mcuh it weighs... sounds incredibly daft- and its probably wrong, but hey....

(Very)Vaguely remembered from school physics lessons.....
Old 11 May 2004, 03:32 PM
  #4  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

What you are talking about is displacement, not weight. A 30cm diameter ball of polystyrene will displace the same amount of water as a 30cm diameter ball of gold, so it's volume not weight. The density of the water will not necessarily be the same as what is displacing it, so it is no a reliable method.

I don't know of a way to do this however, I'm sure someone on here will though.

Geezer
Old 11 May 2004, 03:33 PM
  #5  
MartinM
Scooby Regular
 
MartinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Freak
You need a human size version of a eureka can

Basically Brim a bucket full of water.
Dunk your head/arm in it and you need to measure how much water gets displaced and pushed out of the bucket(maybe put the bucket in the bath so its collected and you can measure it)
You can then work out from this amount and the original amount in the bucket how mcuh it weighs... sounds incredibly daft- and its probably wrong, but hey....

(Very)Vaguely remembered from school physics lessons.....
So dunk a blown up balloon in the bucket...
Weight of water displaced = lots
Weight of balloon = bu$$er all

hmmmm...."Houston, we have a problem"

Volumes are equal however, so doing hard sums with relative density of water, air and rubber would give an answer - anyone know the relative density of a head
Old 11 May 2004, 03:36 PM
  #6  
Freak
Scooby Regular
 
Freak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: JFK/LHR
Posts: 3,571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

originally posted by Freak
sounds incredibly daft- and its probably wrong, but hey....
Old 11 May 2004, 03:41 PM
  #7  
MartinM
Scooby Regular
 
MartinM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Posts: 1,496
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

There's a few ideas here:
http://www.halfbakery.com/idea/Weigh...r_20own_20head

I like the one along teh lines of

"Lay your head on a bathroom scale, and then look up really quick to see what it reads. It doesn't work, but its fun to watch someone doing it"
Old 11 May 2004, 03:45 PM
  #8  
RichWalk
Scooby Regular
 
RichWalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: "Comfortably Numb" since Aug 2003
Posts: 17,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Go on a forensics based site they should advise average weights per body part per size/weight of males/females etc, then work on their models.
Old 11 May 2004, 03:52 PM
  #9  
David Lock
Scooby Regular
 
David Lock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Weston Super Mare, Somerset.
Posts: 14,102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Local mortuary?
Old 11 May 2004, 03:57 PM
  #10  
Big C
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Now showing in Texas....
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice so far, think I have had a think at all of those. The most obvious to me was the sitting in a bath/head in bucket option, but the arguments already outlined disprove that method. There must be a weigh however to link displacement via the relative mass to give a pretty accurate answer. I'm sure ballistics experts could provide a view on the density of the human head when calculating projectile velocity through that medium etc..)

Interrogating forensic models will give me ball park, but i am looking for a relative degree of accuracy for a specific individuals anatomy (with the usual variables as issues - being 'big boned' etc
These variables area big enough factor to rule out this method.
The half bakery website seems to be addressing the issues but hasn't got there quite yet. Some good ideas though using MRI etc...

Any more for any more?

cheers,
C
Old 11 May 2004, 03:57 PM
  #11  
AvalancheS8
Scooby Regular
 
AvalancheS8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 461
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Geezer
What you are talking about is displacement, not weight. A 30cm diameter ball of polystyrene will displace the same amount of water as a 30cm diameter ball of gold, so it's volume not weight. The density of the water will not necessarily be the same as what is displacing it, so it is no a reliable method.

I don't know of a way to do this however, I'm sure someone on here will though.

Geezer
The law of physics being incorrectly applied in these ideas is " a floating body will displace it's own weight of water" so it will only work with things that float, or as a way of finding the volume of something if you know the density of. Your head might, or might not float on it's own but it would be nigh on impossible get it to float with no influence from the rest of your body while it's still attached. That said, the average human body only just floats anyway (some float well, others not at all - I don't, or at least not in fresh water), so I wouldn't be surprised if the density of a head is pretty cloase to that of water, so the "stick your head in a bucket" trick might work as a start. You don't need to catch and measure the displaced water, just start with it full to the brim - plunge body part - remove body part - carefully measure how much water you need to add to fill it back up. Or better yet weigh the full bucket and then weigh it again after displacing some with your head.
Old 11 May 2004, 04:07 PM
  #12  
STi wanna Subaru
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
STi wanna Subaru's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 16,517
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Big C
nice so far, think I have had a think at all of those. The most obvious to me was the sitting in a bath/head in bucket option, but the arguments already outlined disprove that method. There must be a weigh however to link displacement via the relative mass to give a pretty accurate answer. I'm sure ballistics experts could provide a view on the density of the human head when calculating projectile velocity through that medium etc..)

Interrogating forensic models will give me ball park, but i am looking for a relative degree of accuracy for a specific individuals anatomy (with the usual variables as issues - being 'big boned' etc
These variables area big enough factor to rule out this method.
The half bakery website seems to be addressing the issues but hasn't got there quite yet. Some good ideas though using MRI etc...

Any more for any more?

cheers,
C

mate, just accept you have a fat head and get over it!


sorry, can't offer anything constructive
Old 11 May 2004, 04:10 PM
  #13  
Big C
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Big C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Now showing in Texas....
Posts: 385
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

mate, just accept you have a fat head and get over it!

LOL
Old 11 May 2004, 04:10 PM
  #14  
Geezer
Scooby Senior
 
Geezer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: North Wales
Posts: 5,826
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

But does 'pretty close' come close enough for his needs? I doubt it. Any given volume of water will not necessarily weigh the same as another anyway, due to differences in temperature. 1m cubed of ice doesn't weigh the same as 1m cubed of water! Weight is determined by gravity, not volume or density.

Geezer
Old 11 May 2004, 04:13 PM
  #15  
Rathy
Scooby Newbie
 
Rathy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Peterborough
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb Try drowning...

Assuming this isn't a wind up, then you can use Archimedes principle, which is roughly: an object is buoyed up with a force equal to the weight of the liquid it displaces.

Probably best to read these intructions through to the end to avoid drowning yourself. Oh and if you do that's not my fault

Get a bucket and fill with water.
Weigh bucket
Place head into bucket, displacing water up to your neck.
Take head out of bucket
Re-weigh bucket
Substitute second weight from first weight and you have the weight of your head.

This method works for all limbs, limited only by the size of the bucket you can obtain and your, err, imagination

Cheers,

Rathy, with too much time on my hands.
Old 11 May 2004, 04:23 PM
  #16  
Brendan Hughes
Scooby Regular
 
Brendan Hughes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: same time, different place
Posts: 11,313
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not enough time to read the thread properly though. You're mixing weight with volume.
Old 11 May 2004, 04:46 PM
  #17  
Chrisgr31
Scooby Regular
 
Chrisgr31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sussex
Posts: 950
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok to weigh your head, get on scales and weigh your whole body.

Now fill your bath to the brim with water, climb in and put your whole body underwater. Stayunderwater until all the excess water has flowed over the edges and'or disappeared down the overflow.

Climb out the bath, and empty the remaining water with a measuring jug.

You now know how much water you displaced. Divide your bodyweight by the water displaced to give you your body density.

Now you can stuff your head in a bucket of water, measure the volume of water lost and calculate the weight from that by using the density arrived at above.
Old 11 May 2004, 04:57 PM
  #18  
Midlife......
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Midlife......'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 11,583
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Nahh!

Need to use the equation Force=Mass x Accelleration.

Apply a known force to head , a handy sized baseball bat will do and measure acccelleration of head with accellerometer and hey presto.

I suggest you only do this once and bear in mind destructive testing of humans may be ilegal.

Midlife.....
Old 11 May 2004, 05:07 PM
  #19  
IWatkins
Scooby Regular
 
IWatkins's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Man, this is too easy......

Saw your own head off and put it on some weighing scales.

Old 11 May 2004, 05:56 PM
  #20  
clarky1982*
Scooby Regular
 
clarky1982*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 45
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why the fck do you want to weigh your head anyway
Old 11 May 2004, 08:24 PM
  #21  
matt85
Scooby Regular
 
matt85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LMAO @ this thread!!
Old 11 May 2004, 10:04 PM
  #22  
Tiggs
Scooby Regular
 
Tiggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 9,307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

did the people who suggested the water/displacement idea have their adult helpers log them on a pc?

my 3 year old isnt that thick!
Old 11 May 2004, 11:27 PM
  #24  
LG John
Scooby Regular
 
LG John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Bradford
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This may sound a bit strange, but here goes:

Short of cutting the thing off,
how would I tell the weight of say my head, or right arm to a good degree of accuracy (say +/- 3%).
I suppose what I am looking for is a method of dioing this without using the bathroom scales. I'm sure there must be a weigh.
Didn't Archemedes have a way around this type of thing?

Let the wisecracking begin
Look mate I'll save you a lot of time and effort and tell you right now.........you do NOT have a 2lb ****
Old 12 May 2004, 08:16 AM
  #25  
Atom290
Scooby Regular
 
Atom290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ive just done it!

We aren't able to measure the weight of a head directly but we can measure its volume and guess its density on the assumption that the brain, like the rest of the body, is mostly water and we know the density of water at 0 °C.

To measure the volume of the head, virtually bald, I lowered my head into a bucket of water filled to the brim. The water has to be near to 0 °C, so it was bloody cold, I lowered it vertically and crown downwards until the water reached the base of my chin. The water that spilled over the sides of the bucket was collected in a larger bowl in which the bucket was standing in and its volume measured. I repeated this five times and the average volume of water displaced was 4.25 litres, giving an estimate of the weight of a human head at 4.25 kilograms
Old 12 May 2004, 08:17 AM
  #26  
Atom290
Scooby Regular
 
Atom290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

has anyone got a towel?
Old 12 May 2004, 09:41 AM
  #27  
+Doc+
Scooby Senior
 
+Doc+'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sunny Ilson
Posts: 4,119
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

An adult human cadaver head cut off around vertebra C3, with no hair, weighs somewhere between 4.5 and 5 kg, constituting around 8% of the whole body mass.

Google is handy sometimes
Old 12 May 2004, 10:03 AM
  #28  
Clett
Scooby Regular
 
Clett's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd agree with Atom on this one. The density of various human bits is more or less 1 (kg per litre). Don't worry too much about the temperature of the water though, it's densest at 4oC, and not much different at other temperatures you're likely to stick your head into. Bear in mind also that unless you expel all the air in your cavities, these will count as mass too when doing it by volume. I would suggest some caution in this matter.
Old 12 May 2004, 10:50 AM
  #29  
Atom290
Scooby Regular
 
Atom290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Did the whole experiment in a vacuum, oh and I breathed out until I was purple!!
Old 12 May 2004, 12:28 PM
  #30  
GU5
Scooby Regular
 
GU5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Witham
Posts: 529
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just make it up, without cutting off the head being weighed nobody will know


Quick Reply: Tricky question? - How to weigh something.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:33 AM.