Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

"self employed" persons & insurance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11 May 2004, 02:18 PM
  #1  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default "self employed" persons & insurance

bit of an involved one this - but anyway:

does anyone know the letter of the law with regard to "self employed" people who turn up and provide their labour, with respect to public liability insurance? would they be covered under the Company's insurance, or would they be expected to have their own?
Old 11 May 2004, 02:45 PM
  #2  
Butty
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Butty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: MY06 STi Spec D
Posts: 5,254
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'd ask your client. You can get coverage by the client if they notify their insurers, but normally they expect you to have your own.
I am not aware of any legal obligation but it should be specified in any contract you have with the client and may be written into std forms of contract for certain industries.
I have coverage through AXA for £5 mill but as its wrapped up with other specific insurance and cover for my house (I work from home) then I can't give you a price.

Nick
Old 11 May 2004, 02:47 PM
  #3  
Jamo
Cooking on Calor
iTrader: (23)
 
Jamo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: in a house full of girls!
Posts: 23,346
Received 7 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

yup, you have to have your own mate.

even if your sub contracting, they dont have to cover you with their cover, unless previously agreed.

jamo
Old 11 May 2004, 02:49 PM
  #4  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks, Butty. It's not actually for me - i want to know what our liability is for any vagabonds who come and work as "self employed". I have asked the broker but they have not responded as yet. i know there is an provision that any "bona fide subcontractors" must have at least £5M PL, but it doesn't say anything about "labour only" type subbies/self employed.

if i had my own way i'd just make everyone go paye.
Old 11 May 2004, 06:20 PM
  #5  
Nick
Scooby Senior
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Highlands
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ProperCharlie
thanks, Butty. It's not actually for me - i want to know what our liability is for any vagabonds who come and work as "self employed". I have asked the broker but they have not responded as yet. i know there is an provision that any "bona fide subcontractors" must have at least £5M PL, but it doesn't say anything about "labour only" type subbies/self employed.

if i had my own way i'd just make everyone go paye.
They need to have their own insurance. In fact having PL insurance is one of the tick boxes for proving to the IR that you are self-employed & not just evading NIC. Remember that an employer has to deduct PAYE & NIC unless it can be shown that the self employed person really is self employed. If you are in the construction industry, then the 714 scheme is protection for you, if not, then you have to check the tickboxes. Part of your contract with the "subbies" will usually specify how much PL they need to have.
Old 11 May 2004, 07:19 PM
  #6  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Nick - thanks for that. It's not technically construction, but the tax issue was concerning me as well, as a paye audit can be painful if they start going on about continuity of employment etc.
Old 11 May 2004, 07:23 PM
  #7  
Nick
Scooby Senior
 
Nick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 1998
Location: Highlands
Posts: 2,805
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by ProperCharlie
Nick - thanks for that. It's not technically construction, but the tax issue was concerning me as well, as a paye audit can be painful if they start going on about continuity of employment etc.
Remember that the rules about construction work are pretty painful. For instance, if I was to do cabling work for a customer in the construction industry, then I would have to have a 714 or they would need to deduct tax.
Old 11 May 2004, 07:29 PM
  #8  
ProperCharlie
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
ProperCharlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

our industry is classified as "forestry" so we don't need our subbies to have CIS certificates. basically, what i have been trying to say to other people within the company as the "subbies" that are being used are not really subbies at all, but are merely toe rags evading income tax. now i know that they have to have insurance (which i suspected all along) i can happily tell this other person that unless he can get copies of the toe rags insurance certificates (which i know they don't have and probably can't afford) then he better tell them to get down the road. job done.

Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
TurboAndy
Insurance
2
18 October 2015 08:01 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Iqy7861
Insurance
5
01 October 2015 07:57 PM
shorty87
Other Marques
0
25 September 2015 08:52 PM



Quick Reply: "self employed" persons & insurance



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:47 PM.