Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Phantom Plate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 28 July 2003, 07:00 PM
  #1  
Alan C
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Alan C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Posting this after a quick search that no one else has.

Just heard on 5 Live about this anti-Gatso product.

Not wanting to get into the leagality etc... But.. May just look into getting a can for testing...

http://www.phantomplate.com
Old 28 July 2003, 07:19 PM
  #2  
wakeboardar
Scooby Regular
 
wakeboardar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

sounds a bit to good to be true

waky
Old 28 July 2003, 07:39 PM
  #3  
Monkeh
Scooby Regular
 
Monkeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A Shanty Town near you !
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I spoke to someone ine the US who bough the photoshield, and it does work, as it was proved by their local police, but the cops will give you a fine if they catch u using it as they cannot see the number plate properly.

I watched an auction with the photoblocker sparay that went for £60 !!! Must be mad as it's not been tested over here yet

Our police spend a lot more time analysing the photo's than our US counterparts.

I would love to give it a go though !!
Old 28 July 2003, 08:21 PM
  #4  
Alan C
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Alan C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The guy on 5 Live (US Reseller) said that the spray on laquer is clear and does not contravene any plate inspection rules. The spray on stuff is also legal in the US.

Or in other words, it is not illegal. Pretty safe in assuming the same here, but maybe on the same lines as the laser diffuser. However, there are no laws preventing the use of laquers or varnishes to number plates as long as your number is clear and visible. Which it is.

A bit more investigation is required. I'm going to order a can 'in the name of research' and try out a simlpe flash photo test myself. Testing on a Gatso will be little harder to arrange, but I'm sure someone here knows another 'someone' who can help out?
Old 28 July 2003, 08:36 PM
  #5  
greasemonkey
Scooby Regular
 
greasemonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: where the wild roses grow
Posts: 5,122
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

They had publicity on Radio 1's Newsbeat earlier too, although the accident people were claiming that using it was illegal, under penalty of a £1000 fine.

Doesn't sound too convincing to me, although after all this publicity I daresay the manufacturers will be shipping a few cans across the pond.
Old 28 July 2003, 08:56 PM
  #6  
hedgehog
Scooby Regular
 
hedgehog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 1,985
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

The government make £120 million per year from their road use tax scheme. What do you think the chances of an evasion method being legal are? Ever got off having to pay your income tax?

Fight them in the courts and join the ABD:

http://www.abd.org.uk
Old 28 July 2003, 08:57 PM
  #7  
scooby_si
Scooby Regular
 
scooby_si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: the middle bit
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

waste of time IMO if you take photo in wrong direction with a normal plate you wont be able to read it but there are shed loads of things the right people can do with an official photo to get what they want
Si
Old 28 July 2003, 09:33 PM
  #8  
Monkeh
Scooby Regular
 
Monkeh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: A Shanty Town near you !
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I just think that if they take your picture and they can just make out the number (and they will try and try again) they will probably fine you for trying to escape a fine


Damn that was a mouthfull
Old 28 July 2003, 11:59 PM
  #9  
vulnax999
Scooby Senior
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (7)
 
vulnax999's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,347
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Post

Try http://www.ukspeedtraps.co.uk/frames.htm for reviews and legal comments of these types of products.

The bottom line is, if the plod think you are trying to evade the law, they don't bust you on a traffic offense ( alone ) they go for obstructing the course of justice.
This came out of a couple of specimen cases with the polarised no. plates and so on.

IIRC the sprays did nothingto hide the plate from cameras.
Old 29 July 2003, 12:09 AM
  #10  
Boro
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Boro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Cornwall
Posts: 7,222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

From other articles ive read, UK speed cameras take pics from a totally different angle to that of other countries and thats were the problem lies. The photoshield has been tested over here on GATSO and didnt work. I think this may fail for the same reasons but id love to see something actually work just so i could see the reaction of the police and government.
Old 29 July 2003, 01:48 AM
  #11  
jaf01uk
Scooby Regular
 
jaf01uk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elgin, NE Scotland
Posts: 635
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Found this while surfin about,
http://sumo.ebid.co.uk/perl/objects/...1-0&mo=auction
Old 29 July 2003, 08:42 AM
  #12  
Plums!
Scooby Regular
 
Plums!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Geneva Switzerland
Posts: 478
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink


Just be careful if you use this stuff....

We had a similar case over here, a guy covered his number plate with mud and went camera hunting....

They managed to identify and track down his car by the dealer sticker, exhaust and even parking damage to his rear bumper.

They threw the book at him!

If you do use something like this your car has to have no distinguishing features.... Like your name on the back window!

If they want you they'll get you!

Plums.
Old 29 July 2003, 08:43 AM
  #13  
ianmiller999
Scooby Regular
 
ianmiller999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,285
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Saw something on this a while ago, when they took the picture the number was practically impossible to read, but if they invert the colours it became quite easy to read. (Apparently)
Old 29 July 2003, 08:49 AM
  #14  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

I can't see it working over here, to be honest.

UK plates already have a thick clear coating, unlike stamped plates.

Scooby si - any enhancement to the picture at all renders the photographic evidence inadmissibe by law.

Evidence has to be in its completely original, unenhanced state.

D



Old 29 July 2003, 08:55 AM
  #15  
Luke
BANNED
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Diablo

are you sure????
Old 29 July 2003, 09:00 AM
  #16  
Luke
BANNED
 
Luke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Diablo

are you sure????
Old 29 July 2003, 09:01 AM
  #17  
scoobydevil1
Scooby Regular
 
scoobydevil1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

it does work with flash photos i have a mate in japan who has tried it out .
there was a system called back flash a few years ago flashed back at the speed camera after the first flash flooding the pic with light thus over exposing the film was £199.
but if you get caught you will be in big trouble with the feds , there is a whole stack of laws they could throw at you .
can get the list and fines ect off my cousin if anybody wants to know what they are.
Old 29 July 2003, 09:02 AM
  #18  
Diablo
Scooby Regular
 
Diablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: £1.785m reasons not to be here :)
Posts: 6,095
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Pretty much.

Any tampering with evidence like enhancing a photograph with clever software should, by law, render it inadmissable, or at the very least highly challengeable.

Its like someone in the cps adding lines to a partial print to make it fit.

Of course, changing the exposure to lighten or darken a photo when developing it is ok, as that is not in any way changing the visible content of the photograph.

D


[Edited by Diablo - 7/29/2003 9:02:53 AM]
Old 29 July 2003, 09:42 AM
  #19  
messiah
Scooby Regular
 
messiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Surviving as a soldier of fortune on the Los Angeles underground...
Posts: 7,181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

didn't they used to say that hairspray or clingfilm over the plate worked too?
Old 29 July 2003, 11:35 AM
  #20  
Alan C
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Alan C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,702
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Slightly conflicting advice. However, the bottom line is that if you are found to be using it i.e GATSO snapped and they locate your car from other features, then there is a distinct likelyhood you'll get done with some law or another. Possibly eleveted to 'perverting the course of justice'. Which is not good.

I'd rather rely on my road angel and take the few points and a quick fine if I miss a mobile trap.

As a law abiding and good all round citizen, I think I'll wait for others to test it for me!
Old 29 July 2003, 11:39 AM
  #21  
misty
Scooby Regular
 
misty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: astra 1.9ctdi with dtuk green box. 195/300
Posts: 2,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Lightbulb

Why not put yur £60 toward a road angel!
Old 29 November 2003, 02:23 PM
  #22  
jono400
Scooby Regular
 
jono400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

See this "photoblocker" licence plate spray still continues to be advertised and receive wide spread press coverage, anyone ever buy it / test it ?? and possibly even accidentaly test it out in a real road life situation ??!!
Old 29 November 2003, 03:06 PM
  #23  
Pbone
Scooby Regular
 
Pbone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not only do they use the original photo but they also turn the piccie into a negative.
Old 29 November 2003, 03:48 PM
  #24  
jono400
Scooby Regular
 
jono400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

According to the "negative image" I seen off one particular anti- flash plate flash photographed, this inverted image could not be viewed either ??!!
Old 29 November 2003, 04:35 PM
  #25  
scooby_si
Scooby Regular
 
scooby_si's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: the middle bit
Posts: 8,238
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

if you think that's all the coppers can do to an image to find yer reg then i guess yer optimistic enough to buy this shyte IMO
Si (diplomatic i said optimistic not gullable lol)
Old 29 November 2003, 06:10 PM
  #26  
stevoWRX
Scooby Regular
 
stevoWRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Glasgow
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

If this is the same thing ( photoshield), Autocar did an article on this 2 0r 3 weeks ago . One of the editors put his on the Mags M5 , drove to the Nurburgring , and back without any " letters " from the DVLA few weeks after ..... however ... Plod spotted it later on and " threw the book at him " plus got severe hastle off his bosses . Moral of the story is IT IS NOT LEGAL am affraid .. SHAME .

Anyone have this issue ?

Steve
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
radave
Subaru Parts
2
16 July 2016 02:19 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
the shreksta
Other Marques
26
01 October 2015 02:30 PM



Quick Reply: Phantom Plate



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:06 AM.