WW3
#3
Is anyone scared about the depending WW3 that could be around the corner.
I am a little..... As I'm not sure the Americains will handle it correctly.
Still confident that if it does happen, I won't know much about it living in Bristol, about 7 miles away from BAC / Rolls Royce. I would have though that this would be target number two, after London.
Still it's a twisted / ****ed up world we live in and am concerned what I have brought my four daughters into.
Cheers (a rather worried) Phill C
I am a little..... As I'm not sure the Americains will handle it correctly.
Still confident that if it does happen, I won't know much about it living in Bristol, about 7 miles away from BAC / Rolls Royce. I would have though that this would be target number two, after London.
Still it's a twisted / ****ed up world we live in and am concerned what I have brought my four daughters into.
Cheers (a rather worried) Phill C
#4
Scooby Regular
Targets are difficult to try and predict. In any "normal" war military targets would be hit first. Against cowardly terrorists, who knows? Watching an article on biochemicals on Sky News last night I must say getting on the tube worries me a bit now.
Steve.
Steve.
#5
I think the lesson of the above is to ignore some of the worst purveyors of terror - the media - who seem to have taken it upon themselves to do their best to scare the general population into believing a world war is going to break out by the time you get home for tea tonight.
If the US was going to lauch an enormous assault on Afghanistan then they would have done in the days directly following the monstrous atrocity in NY - I'm fairly confident (and I hope also right) that the response will be a long term campaign against individual cells throughout the world rather than any ill-advised and retaliation provoking assaults on general targets. If we can draw anything positive out of this it will be to form a global resolution against all terrorism where all nations define what they mean by terrorist activity and then vow to stop it wherever and whenever they can. Hopefully then will all nations stop sponsoring terrorism wherever it may be.
If the US was going to lauch an enormous assault on Afghanistan then they would have done in the days directly following the monstrous atrocity in NY - I'm fairly confident (and I hope also right) that the response will be a long term campaign against individual cells throughout the world rather than any ill-advised and retaliation provoking assaults on general targets. If we can draw anything positive out of this it will be to form a global resolution against all terrorism where all nations define what they mean by terrorist activity and then vow to stop it wherever and whenever they can. Hopefully then will all nations stop sponsoring terrorism wherever it may be.
#6
Scooby Regular
It didn't really have anything to do with the media unfortunately, bin Laden has already used chemical weapons in terrorism (sarin gas, Tokyo underground) and that's what worries me.
Steve.
Steve.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
allymac
General Technical
5
17 March 2007 11:28 PM
The Zohan
Non Scooby Related
51
03 May 2006 01:29 PM