Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

Monitors & desktops - ideal size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 06:08 PM
  #1  
The_Gza's Avatar
The_Gza
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,640
Likes: 0
From: Sybaris
Question

Anyone know what the idea size for your screen size/desktop is supposed to be?

I guess bigger is better, but is there a trade-off between size and having to squint at the screen to make things out?

I did have a 15" monitor which was running at 1024x768, but have now got a 17" monitor which I've changed to 1152x864 so I can get more on.

But this is my work PC and I have to stare at it day-in, day-out - so I'd happily sacrifice some size if I'm going to start damaging my eyes.

Anyone who has a 17" monitor - what resoultion do you run it at?

Any ideas/info appreciated!

Cheers
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 07:09 PM
  #2  
Mr.Cookie's Avatar
Mr.Cookie
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 5,757
Likes: 0
From: www.mrcookie.co.uk
Post

1024 by 768 for me, mind my monitor is a cheapy and i can notice flicker at anything higher

Si
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 07:15 PM
  #3  
polarbearit's Avatar
polarbearit
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 2,583
Likes: 0
From: Wiltshire
Lightbulb

Well I have a 21" at work running @ 1280*1024 and a 19" Trinitron at home running the same resolution. When I use a 17" monitor (which I also use occasionally at home, but used to use all the time), I run 1024*768, I started at 1280*1024 and them dropped to 1152*864 and then later to 1024*768, then I upgraded. Put simply for day in day out I found anything more than 1024*768 was making me squint/get closes to the screen to read. It does depend on the screen, I find Flater (trinitron etc) ones much easier to read and can usually use a slightly higher resolution.

Jon
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 09:05 PM
  #4  
Mick's Avatar
Mick
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 1998
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 4
Cool

17" - 1024 x 768 - cheap monitor.

Mick
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 09:24 PM
  #5  
IWatkins's Avatar
IWatkins
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2000
Posts: 4,531
Likes: 0
From: Gloucestershire, home of the lawnmower.
Post

1024 x 768 on cheap 17" (but higher refresh rates help => 85Hz)

1280 x 1024 on fair but very flat 19" running at 90Hz with True colour. Very easy to work with and I use it all day (and most of the evening)

Cheers

Ian
Reply
Old Sep 10, 2001 | 10:44 PM
  #6  
KF's Avatar
KF
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
Post

Depends what apps you are running.

If you are looking at text all day, then you don't want to push it, but if you are looking at pictures then you can. Keep refresh above 75Hz, and take at least 5 minutes each hour throwing your focus to infinity, and you should be fine.

I have a perma-monitor-tan and run 1600x1200 on a 19" writing code without too much trouble (I don't wear glasses).

If you find yourself squinting, drop the res. Simple.
KF.
Reply
Old Sep 12, 2001 | 04:05 PM
  #7  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

Dual Monitor on 2000 at work 17" Compaq V75 1024x768
Home: IIYama (or However spelt) 19" 1280 x 1024

and as many colours as possible... (I never play games though.. cant be ar$ed after working with computers all day!)

David
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
Nov 18, 2015 07:03 AM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
Nov 13, 2015 10:49 AM
FuZzBoM
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
16
Oct 4, 2015 09:49 PM
T.K
General Technical
10
Oct 2, 2015 11:35 AM
Nick_Cat
Computer & Technology Related
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:00 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 AM.