Notices
Non Scooby Related Anything Non-Scooby related

URGENT-program to find lost files!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2001 | 01:34 AM
  #1  
Hanslow's Avatar
Hanslow
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 4,496
Likes: 0
From: Derbyshire
Wink

Norton Utilities has/had a utility (suprisingly ) that could recover deleted files off disk. Each file it found that could be recovered would have a missing first character that you would have to pick. Depending on length of time and if the disk space had subsequently been re-used would govern whether or not the files could be deleted.

Not sure if there is something within windows that would do the same thing
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2001 | 08:20 AM
  #2  
ChristianR's Avatar
ChristianR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,329
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Post



ChrisB> if you read what I original wrote, SCANDISK found one of them, i.e a .chk file, as it was a broken cluster!

I am using NTFS on WindowsXP.. I am not a lemming when it comes to the pc, but just need a util, as I aint had this happen to me before!! Well not with an ntfs file system anyway.

HAnslow- i will try that program, have a copy somewhere, but as I stated, I did not delete them- to me seems more like a hard-disk missing clusters etc.. but well it only managed to find one of them!
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2001 | 12:02 PM
  #3  
ChristianR's Avatar
ChristianR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,329
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Post

had some digital pictures of a stag night (only pictures taken) the pictures where on my pc, they are not now.. the pics have not been deleted..

scan disk has found one of them!! anyone know of any programs to find the others??
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2001 | 12:17 PM
  #4  
ChrisB's Avatar
ChrisB
Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 1998
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
From: Staffs
Post

Windows 95 onwards has a file search built in.

Start > Find

If they are off an digi cam, then I would do a search for *.jpg or *.jpeg

You could narrow down the dates on the search if you get a lot of results.

ChrisB.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2001 | 01:40 PM
  #5  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

Christian...

Dont suppose you have accidently removed the ntfs permissions off them??

virus checker quarrantined them??

possibly bug in xp as files dont just disappear with NTFS... Autochk hasnt run on bootup recently has it, has I have had that just delete files before as it said there were problems with it....

Do a search for network undelete software... there is some that supports ntfs and can get files back that are not in recycle bin... (been deleted by network clients..)

David
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2001 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
ChristianR's Avatar
ChristianR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,329
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Post

nope, havent touched them.

they were there, next day they were in the folder.. machine crashed. next day when i went on, folder in place, no pictures in folder.. as i have said no-one has deleted them or anything - my machine, so i would know! it is my home pc, and no-one touches it

only by fluke did i see a found.000 dir on my root of c: went inside was one .chk file, about 1.4meg (that is how big each picture is) opened it up, and it was the first picture..

but i have no idea where the others went. extremely annoying.
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2001 | 07:12 PM
  #7  
ChristianR's Avatar
ChristianR
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 6,329
Likes: 1
From: Europe
Post

aghh! foolish me, when i upgraded, left it as FAT32! no luck now is there?
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2001 | 10:43 AM
  #8  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

A lot less chance now.. fat32 is better than some but no way as good as ntfs... I would imagine that chkdsk is more ruthless with fat32 files than it is with ntfs as well...

Hang on and Ill have a look to see what tools Ive got in my cd folder...

David
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2001 | 10:50 AM
  #9  
David_Wallis's Avatar
David_Wallis
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2001
Posts: 15,239
Likes: 1
From: Leeds - It was 562.4bhp@28psi on Optimax, How much closer to 600 with race fuel and a bigger turbo?
Post

have a look here... may be something...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
Nov 13, 2015 10:49 AM
TylerD529
General Technical
2
Oct 9, 2015 01:53 AM
blackieblob
ScoobyNet General
2
Oct 2, 2015 05:34 PM
makkink
General Technical
10
Oct 1, 2015 05:41 PM
Nick_Cat
Computer & Technology Related
2
Sep 26, 2015 08:00 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:19 AM.