Here's one for all the prejudiced twonks, Matthew Kelly will not be charged.
24 February 2003, 02:09 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bushey
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
but he was found guilty by his Scoobynet peers, surely he should be in the slammer? 
24 February 2003, 02:19 PM
#3
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what .... today in courts 100's will walk free due to "Lack of evidence"today and every other day
means he is free.... doesnt mean they didnt do anything.....other than host krap tv shows
means he is free.... doesnt mean they didnt do anything.....other than host krap tv shows
24 February 2003, 02:29 PM
#5
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: A powerslide near you
Posts: 10,261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So Luke. do you think he is guilty or not? It's a serious allegation to make against anyone, famous or not.
Don't forget, someone could start a 'Luke is a paedophile' campaign which would be wrong but that wouldn't matter to people who think you're guilty anyway (for no good reason).
Don't forget, someone could start a 'Luke is a paedophile' campaign which would be wrong but that wouldn't matter to people who think you're guilty anyway (for no good reason).
24 February 2003, 02:32 PM
#7
Moderator
Join Date: Dec 1998
Location: Staffs
Posts: 23,573
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I was just off searching for the original threads Reffro...
Here's a post from Unclebuck:
http://www.scoobynet.co.uk/bbs/threa...=167799&Page=1
Nothing like a bandwagon to jump on is there?
Here's a post from Unclebuck:
Now, why does that not suprise me
****...
****...
Nothing like a bandwagon to jump on is there?
Trending Topics
24 February 2003, 02:46 PM
#8
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont know if he is or he isnt.
But i do care about how many get off crimes due to lack of evidence etc.But if he has been naughty Time will tell. maybe something will get leaked to the press etc..
But if he is 1000 % innocent. Then my heart goes out to him.
But i do care about how many get off crimes due to lack of evidence etc.But if he has been naughty Time will tell. maybe something will get leaked to the press etc..
But if he is 1000 % innocent. Then my heart goes out to him.
24 February 2003, 04:58 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Bushey
Posts: 2,542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Luke if that is true, would you care to drop your licence round to me sometime this week, and cease from driving any more. As I know you regularly speed when driving and must have committed enough offences to be well over 12 points. Then after a sutiable period you can apply for an extended re-test, if you pass you can have your licence back. And don't even think about arguing this, because everyone here knows you will have been speeding enough for this to be true, so give up your licence and get on your bike. I don't need proof, just the assumption of guilt to be right........
24 February 2003, 06:56 PM
#13
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Location: Location.
Posts: 3,439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lets be honest about it. His life is going to be sh*t from now on anyway. How many shows do you think he'll be asked to host?
If he did it - hell mend him.
If he did'nt - life ain't fair.
Alas
If he did it - hell mend him.
If he did'nt - life ain't fair.
Alas
24 February 2003, 07:03 PM
#14
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So what even if he was guilty.... the law would have let him out after a few years and let him travel abroad to commit other offences like Gary Glitter.
But if you know the reputation of Sri lanka and especialy Negombo (A TERRIBLE PLACE FOR CHILD ABUSE). Then it makes you wonder...........
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 7:04:53 PM]
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 9:10:31 PM]
But if you know the reputation of Sri lanka and especialy Negombo (A TERRIBLE PLACE FOR CHILD ABUSE). Then it makes you wonder...........
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 7:04:53 PM]
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 9:10:31 PM]
24 February 2003, 08:13 PM
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Croydon (ish)
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I ALWAYS said he was innocent. Every post I wrote on this I said I dont believe the allegations when made so many years after the event was supposed to happen!
Glad to see faith in British Justice restored
Glad to see faith in British Justice restored
24 February 2003, 08:26 PM
#17
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I know Sri lanka like the back of my hand. My great grand parents lived there. She owned the best hotel on the island he was a diplomat. My grand father was born there. I have visited many times. My ex is working at the elephant orphanage as I write. I have worked there on 3 occasions(Negombo mainly)
It is my opinion that anyone from europe etc who lives around negumbo has a VERY HIGH CHANCE of been involded with child abuse.
I have to many stories to tell about the matter.
Your cards are marked when going to Sri lanka nowadays...
Its a terrible place.
No one of any substance would live there knowing its reputation. And there is NO WAY you wouldnt.
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 8:27:51 PM]
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 8:28:26 PM]
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 9:10:52 PM]
It is my opinion that anyone from europe etc who lives around negumbo has a VERY HIGH CHANCE of been involded with child abuse.
I have to many stories to tell about the matter.
Your cards are marked when going to Sri lanka nowadays...
Its a terrible place.
No one of any substance would live there knowing its reputation. And there is NO WAY you wouldnt.
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 8:27:51 PM]
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 8:28:26 PM]
[Edited by Luke - 2/24/2003 9:10:52 PM]
24 February 2003, 08:47 PM
#18
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Croydon (ish)
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dear Shrek
Sure you should be reading this thread.
Basically you're saying that any European who goes to Sri Lanka is involved in the Sex trade! My point is that the allegations againt Kelly were from 20 something years ago, why wait till NOW to accuse him.
I think you've been reading The Sun/Daily Mail too much
Here's one for all the prejudiced twonks, Matthew Kelly will not be charged.
Basically you're saying that any European who goes to Sri Lanka is involved in the Sex trade! My point is that the allegations againt Kelly were from 20 something years ago, why wait till NOW to accuse him.
I think you've been reading The Sun/Daily Mail too much
24 February 2003, 09:05 PM
#19
BANNED
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: In my own little world
Posts: 9,644
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
"My point is that the allegations againt Kelly were from 20 something years ago, why wait till NOW to accuse him.
very good point.... could be a trend thing. But his contact/s with sri lanka are not 20 years old.......
very good point.... could be a trend thing. But his contact/s with sri lanka are not 20 years old.......
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
