uncle buck

What is it with police and social workers? [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img] Have they made some kind of pact or something? They don't seem to think that ANYONE should go to prison [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Mobile phone muggers *should* get custodial sentances for mobile phone theft with violence [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Make an example of them [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

NotoriousREV

As far as I'm concerned, lock everyone up except me, my family and friends, I guarantee there will be zero crime then. Apart from the odd traffic offence.

We do need stricter and more consistent sentencing. You hear about middle aged couples going to jail for lopping down a hedge, while young ******* get let off with 2 minutes community service for breaking and entering. The law is an ***.

uncle buck

Knife attack over a tart? [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]


Life for the psycho!! [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

uncle buck

drug addict, thieving, single mother scum - who's gonna miss them?[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

illigitimate kid already in care

only two years max on offer - go for it, 2 years minimum [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Clarebabes

Hard one this. Any crime with violence should be punished by prison. I feel that the guy who accidently killed his friend was given a very severe sentence, especially when you think it's the same sentence given to the mugger.

Drug rehabilitation should be part of any punishment when the perp is tested positive. When will people realise that is the cause of the crime. That woman would not be offending if she wasn't on drugs.

I'm just glad I was brought up well and would never commit anything more serious than going a few miles an hour over the limit. Of course, in Northampton, we are SCUM! [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

uncle buck

A while we're at it, bang up Fiona bl00dy Bruce, the stupid mouthy cow [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

fatherpierre

She's quite horny though, in an older woman type way. Bang her - don't bang her up

BOB.T

Sorry, Fiona would soooo get it, she's a fox

I notice there was no "shoot the ******" option[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Little Miss WRX

Social workers........well, having personal experience with social services and social workers through my sister......

I can't comment, it makes me mad, sorry but my honest opinion is they are a waste of time, there may be some good ones out there, but godamnit they are fecking few and far between [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

The programme also tried to make excuses for the bloke who drove a boat pi55ed??? Get ******* real!!!! He shouldn't have been on the boat [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]
The rules for boats and rivers SERIOUSLY need reviewing [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

I think they had VERY carefully picked those cases to match the public opinion. I am sure there are more contraversial cases to have put on.

[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Clarebabes

I think they put these cases on because they are the sort of crimes going on every day. (Maybe not the river /manslaughter case - I should imagine that sort of thing is fairly rare)

The problem with our judicial system is that there is no consistency to the sentencing. One day they would have got 12 month's community service, on another, a much harsher sentence.

I dunno, crimes with violence still should be seriously punished. They are bullies and need teaching a lesson!

BOB.T

It wouldn't be so bad if crims actually did their timeI think if you get sentenced to two years you should serve two years, not six months[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img] what's all this good behaviour malarkey, they're criminals ffs[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Also, we should fill prisons with people who need to be there, rapists, kiddie fiddlers etc... pulling a wheelie or speeding should not end in a prison term[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Little Miss WRX

I don't think those cases were fair at all!!!!!

I am sure there are more cases of contraversial sentencing to be shown, that program as always is fixed!!!!!

[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Little Miss WRX

When I say fair, I mean a fair representation of sentencing.

boomer

"...and the vast majority of callers think that option B (21%) and option C (23%) is preferable to option D (35%)".

WELL OF COURSE if you add up B and C together they will be bigger than D - but that is not the point [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

Plus Miss Smarty-pants who kept cutting off people mid-sentence, meant that the telly was turned off.

The program was the (over-produced) BBC at it's worst

mb

uncle buck

That'll be FB then

Agree, she was *very* irritating and generally low brow

Bob - the picture doesn't look very 'foxy' to me

Little Miss WRX

Hear, hear boomer!!!!!

Little Miss WRX

What a failure that program was.

Completely rigged IMHO, trying to get public confidence back into our crappy judicial system???? Do they think we are stupid??? [img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]

BOB.T

yeah, perhaps not the best pic in the world, it was short notice though

I thought the chap who was speaking for the ex cons had his head screwed on

On the mid sentence cutting off thing, maybe that's just a BBC thing, Jonny Vaughn does it but a milion times worse[img]images/smilies/mad.gif[/img]