Angela Rayner.
22 February 2022, 10:37 AM
#1
Scooby Senior
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Wildberg, Germany/Reading, UK
Posts: 9,706
Likes: 0
Received 73 Likes
on
54 Posts
Angela Rayner.
It is a real pity the comments section on Skynews articles is no longer available as I suspect this would make some interesting reading.
https://news.sky.com/story/labour-de...econd-12545044
I agree with here, the authorities in the UK spend to much time fannying around before doing anything and our police and Army are to scared to fire their weapons because they know they will be dragged through the courts for doing their job.
https://news.sky.com/story/labour-de...econd-12545044
I agree with here, the authorities in the UK spend to much time fannying around before doing anything and our police and Army are to scared to fire their weapons because they know they will be dragged through the courts for doing their job.
22 February 2022, 03:47 PM
#3
Scooby Senior
Don't think many would disagree with shooting terrorists. I would argue shoot to disable would be preferred, so we can then string them up, torture them and get valuable info on their terrorist cells before locking them up and throwing away the key! If you can't shoot to disable, then shoot to kill is the next best option!
General rule - if someone is prepared to kill, then they are prepared to be killed!
General rule - if someone is prepared to kill, then they are prepared to be killed!
22 February 2022, 04:10 PM
#4
Scooby Regular
Depends on who is nominated as a terrorist , could simply be someone whos face doesnt fit caught on camera ,for protesting anything
this is the way we're headed
this is the way we're headed
The following users liked this post:
22 February 2022, 04:38 PM
#5
22 February 2022, 05:01 PM
#6
Scooby Senior
Fully agree! Doesn't have to be a terrorist per say, just someone who is threatening violence to someone else! Terrorists, hooligans, abusers, all the same to me and fair game to receive a bullet!
Trending Topics
23 February 2022, 03:01 AM
#9
Don't think many would disagree with shooting terrorists. I would argue shoot to disable would be preferred, so we can then string them up, torture them and get valuable info on their terrorist cells before locking them up and throwing away the key! If you can't shoot to disable, then shoot to kill is the next best option!
General rule - if someone is prepared to kill, then they are prepared to be killed!
General rule - if someone is prepared to kill, then they are prepared to be killed!
23 February 2022, 09:41 AM
#10
Scooby Senior
Depends on the situation, if we're talking bomb detonation scenario, then yeah, shoot to kill in the first instance, but machete wielding terrorists, you can have a couple of pops at disabling first!
The following users liked this post:
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jaybird-UK
Non Scooby Related
51
29 December 2010 07:33 PM