View Poll Results: Are the Tories wrong for discriminating against non-Muslims and homosexuals?
Yes
5
71.43%
No
2
28.57%
Voters: 7. You may not vote on this poll
Are the questionable Tories wrong about atheists & homosexuals hindering the Council?
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Are the questionable Tories wrong about atheists & homosexuals hindering the Council?
http://www.newhamrecorder.co.uk/news...045?usurv=skip
Reason #983 to vote UKIP?
Election leaflets urging Muslims in Newham to vote for the Conservative Party and claiming the council is run by gays and atheists are being investigated by police.
#2
Look, it's only the betting shops one I find hypocritical (source: the picture embedded in the coverage you posted). All other pledges seem to be reasonably accommodating, and the coverage clearly mentions that -
So what's the problem?
I reckon that 'another leaflet' has been published and circulated by UKIP as a counter-weapon; in order to undercut the Conmen- I mean Consies.
Another leaflet, which may not be from the Conservatives, lists what it calls the Labour Party’s failures in the borough, saying: “In senior council positions, there are seven times more gays and three times less ethnic minorities than the resident population.
So what's the problem?
I reckon that 'another leaflet' has been published and circulated by UKIP as a counter-weapon; in order to undercut the Conmen- I mean Consies.
#3
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Look, it's only the betting shops one I find hypocritical (source: the picture embedded in the coverage you posted). All other pledges seem to be reasonably accommodating, and the coverage clearly mentions that -
So what's the problem?
I reckon that 'another leaflet' has been published and circulated by UKIP as a counter-weapon; in order to undercut the Conmen- I mean Consies.
So what's the problem?
I reckon that 'another leaflet' has been published and circulated by UKIP as a counter-weapon; in order to undercut the Conmen- I mean Consies.
Imagine the media storm - "UKIP leaflet stating there are too many women and Muslims in Rochdale Council"
Last edited by RS_Matt; 20 May 2014 at 03:19 PM.
#4
The problem is it's homophobic and discriminatory to non-Muslims, Don't forget it's only the local rag reporting it, not some far-right warmongering machine, most of it is as you say on the level. UKIP haven't even mentioned it unlike the Media/Left/Hippies do when the shoe is on the other foot.
Imagine the media storm - "UKIP leaflet stating there are too many women and Muslims in Rochdale Council"
Imagine the media storm - "UKIP leaflet stating there are too many women and Muslims in Rochdale Council"
Homophobia shouldn't be a big issue here on SN, as the majority here comes across as homophobic, anyway. Supposed investigation of the atheists can't be such a big issue, either. That's because a super-duper logical than a logic atheist would have nothing to hide. But Consies' opportunistic accommodating stance to Muslims may profoundly disturb an average SN poster that may take their love for Muslims as a rejection to non-Muslim. The main thing is: Let's see if this helps UKIP to gain more votes.
I am surprised that the leaflet doesn't involve the objective- "Convert every non-Muslim into Muslim and force them eat Halal". It would have really worked in this current climate.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Brzoza
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
1
02 October 2015 05:26 PM