Buyng STI - what to look for
#1
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Buyng STI - what to look for
hi guys,
Im new to the forum and I am looking into buying a Subaru impreza sti, after a few years messing with vw's due to high insurance I am now getting to the age where I can afford to insure a proper car.
I have been looking at subarus and evos and to me subarus seem much nicer and better built cars and you seem to get a lot more for your money with a Subaru so ive 100% decided Subaru.
im looking to get a hawkeye sti but im just wondering if there are any things I should look out for, common problems etc when buying.
any help would be greatly appreciated
Im new to the forum and I am looking into buying a Subaru impreza sti, after a few years messing with vw's due to high insurance I am now getting to the age where I can afford to insure a proper car.
I have been looking at subarus and evos and to me subarus seem much nicer and better built cars and you seem to get a lot more for your money with a Subaru so ive 100% decided Subaru.
im looking to get a hawkeye sti but im just wondering if there are any things I should look out for, common problems etc when buying.
any help would be greatly appreciated
#3
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I much prefer the look of the hawkeye's tbh, don't get me wrong I do like blob eyes don't get me wrong but I haven't seen many hawkeyes on the road.
The 2.0 in the blobeye do they not have the Same problems of the classic subarus with the bottom ends? A few people I know have had no ends of troubles with the bottom ends including my brother with a classic facelift uk2000. This is one thing that has always made me weary of the 2.0l but I don't know much about the engines or the newer engines
The 2.0 in the blobeye do they not have the Same problems of the classic subarus with the bottom ends? A few people I know have had no ends of troubles with the bottom ends including my brother with a classic facelift uk2000. This is one thing that has always made me weary of the 2.0l but I don't know much about the engines or the newer engines
#4
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#5
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
anyone else got any opinions?
looking to run 340ish bhp with switchable map as the car will be used daily so i can run it on an eco map for daily driving.
i want something thats going to be good on the road.
i read the 2.5s are a much better engine for fast road use due to the better torque and low down power? im not looking to build a 500bhp monster or anything like that. Just a reliable 340 will do me nicely
looking to run 340ish bhp with switchable map as the car will be used daily so i can run it on an eco map for daily driving.
i want something thats going to be good on the road.
i read the 2.5s are a much better engine for fast road use due to the better torque and low down power? im not looking to build a 500bhp monster or anything like that. Just a reliable 340 will do me nicely
#6
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ad buy the blob with it having the stronger engine than the 2.5 with its known problems. (Chocolate pistons) and head gasket problems. The money u save on buying a blob over a hawk u could put the hawk front end on it. Best of both worlds
#7
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
only thing that puts me off the 2.0l is the bottom end problems but i dont know much about the newer engines and im guessing this isnt a problem? my brother and a few people local have had no end of trouble with bottom ends (older classic shape imprezas)
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The newage sti's have a really good engine mate. Nothing like the old ones. Worlds apart!!! Think a full front end for a hawk goes for about £1500 plus u get Most of that back for the blob front end. Win win
#9
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
also do you what the boxes and diffs are like? my brother now has an evo 5, on rolling road it pulled just over 400bhp and hes on his 3rd rear diff (hes now saving for an rs one) which are suppose to be bullet proof
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
thats really good to know thanks for your info, i will look for a later blobeye with dccd then. how easy is 340bhp from the blobeyes? im guessing your running 332? what mods are you running to get the sort of power?
also do you what the boxes and diffs are like? my brother now has an evo 5, on rolling road it pulled just over 400bhp and hes on his 3rd rear diff (hes now saving for an rs one) which are suppose to be bullet proof
also do you what the boxes and diffs are like? my brother now has an evo 5, on rolling road it pulled just over 400bhp and hes on his 3rd rear diff (hes now saving for an rs one) which are suppose to be bullet proof
The above should`nt cost more than £500-600 if you use OS mapping, excluding the exhaust as you will be hard pushed to find one with a standard one still on it...
Last edited by The Pink Ninja; 24 March 2013 at 06:50 PM.
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Av sold the car now but it's not hard. Full Decat 3" system fuel pump and a map will see u at the 330-340 some say 350. Few lads running 600bhp on the box and diffs just need a good clutch haha Early blobs had synchro problems but they were revised in 05 I think something to do with materials used a think. I don't really see why everyone says to get the dccd surely it can't make that much difference.
#12
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
thats good then, i was looking at 3" turbo back exhaust, panel filter, 255lh walbro fuel pump and now i know i will go for some better plugs aswell, mapping wise i have heard alot of good things about andy forest and ive got a few mates that would be well up for a long weekend trip upto scotland with me to get the car mapped and have a bit of fum on some twistys lol
and i like the sounds of some of the additonal things that can be mapped in plus i would want switchable maps
and i like the sounds of some of the additonal things that can be mapped in plus i would want switchable maps
#15
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
tbh i aint too fussed for the hawk front end, i do prefer them but i do still like the look of the blobeyes and i certainly wouldnt rush into changing it, the money could be spent in better places lol
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
thats good then, i was looking at 3" turbo back exhaust, panel filter, 255lh walbro fuel pump and now i know i will go for some better plugs aswell, mapping wise i have heard alot of good things about andy forest and ive got a few mates that would be well up for a long weekend trip upto scotland with me to get the car mapped and have a bit of fum on some twistys lol
and i like the sounds of some of the additonal things that can be mapped in plus i would want switchable maps
and i like the sounds of some of the additonal things that can be mapped in plus i would want switchable maps
#18
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
got a link?
thats what ive been looking at, the EcuTek remaps as i would want switchable mapping
thats what ive been looking at, the EcuTek remaps as i would want switchable mapping
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
Just to let you know you can have 2 maps on the OEM ecu with OS software which does not require the license like EcuTek and is a good£200 cheaper, Not trying to sway you in either direction just letting you know what is out there, My last car was OS and my current one is EcuTek
#20
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 3,221
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the ecutek on a uk blob does not offer 2 full switchable maps, where as os does I beleive, so if you are definitely wanting 2 maps then unless you change to a simtek or similar you won't get it, unless you buy a jdm blob or a uk hawk which is fly by wire rather than throttle cable so you can run race rom (i think its called that) which has a 2 map function
I think I've got that right
I think I've got that right
#21
Thanks for the input, it looks like thats what i will be doing as im reading all sorts about the 2.5's, i just liked the idea of the 2.5's low end power and better torque but with i being a daily i dont want to be getting head gasket issues or other problems
only thing that puts me off the 2.0l is the bottom end problems but i dont know much about the newer engines and im guessing this isnt a problem? my brother and a few people local have had no end of trouble with bottom ends (older classic shape imprezas)
only thing that puts me off the 2.0l is the bottom end problems but i dont know much about the newer engines and im guessing this isnt a problem? my brother and a few people local have had no end of trouble with bottom ends (older classic shape imprezas)
There have been some cars that have had head gasket issues and it was far more common in the early 2006 cars. Also some cars have had piston ring land fractures but most of these were modified or not run on 99ron fuel i suspect. The ring land issue was moree common on the 2008> hatch cars prompting subaru to revise the map. I think its fair to say the newage 2L engine is more tuner friendly on standard internals but it's also fair to say plenty of those have gone pop too from head gaskets or main bearings. Some say the standard 2.5 is ok upto 400bhp. Personally i say keep it under 360bhp.
One advantage with the hawk if your planning a re-map is you can have duel maps, launch control, auto blip and flat foot gear shift mapped in due to its "drive by wire" throttle. They also have the sweeping dash clocks.
#22
Scooby Newbie
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
And the ecutek on a uk blob does not offer 2 full switchable maps, where as os does I beleive, so if you are definitely wanting 2 maps then unless you change to a simtek or similar you won't get it, unless you buy a jdm blob or a uk hawk which is fly by wire rather than throttle cable so you can run race rom (i think its called that) which has a 2 map function
I think I've got that right
I think I've got that right
The new age cars from 01 onwards have an excellent Denso ECU, this has more functionality than some aftermarket "performance" items.
Typical functions include map swapping between standard and performance maps whilst driving (on 01 onwards models) gear dependant boost control, temperature controlled boost level to ensure the car is properly warmed up before full power is allowed and much more.
2.5 is a great road car engine with huge low down torque. If you like a car that pulls hard without having to rev the ***** off it and without having to change down a gear you will like it.
There have been some cars that have had head gasket issues and it was far more common in the early 2006 cars. Also some cars have had piston ring land fractures but most of these were modified or not run on 99ron fuel i suspect. The ring land issue was moree common on the 2008> hatch cars prompting subaru to revise the map. I think its fair to say the newage 2L engine is more tuner friendly on standard internals but it's also fair to say plenty of those have gone pop too from head gaskets or main bearings. Some say the standard 2.5 is ok upto 400bhp. Personally i say keep it under 360bhp.
One advantage with the hawk if your planning a re-map is you can have duel maps, launch control, auto blip and flat foot gear shift mapped in due to its "drive by wire" throttle. They also have the sweeping dash clocks.
There have been some cars that have had head gasket issues and it was far more common in the early 2006 cars. Also some cars have had piston ring land fractures but most of these were modified or not run on 99ron fuel i suspect. The ring land issue was moree common on the 2008> hatch cars prompting subaru to revise the map. I think its fair to say the newage 2L engine is more tuner friendly on standard internals but it's also fair to say plenty of those have gone pop too from head gaskets or main bearings. Some say the standard 2.5 is ok upto 400bhp. Personally i say keep it under 360bhp.
One advantage with the hawk if your planning a re-map is you can have duel maps, launch control, auto blip and flat foot gear shift mapped in due to its "drive by wire" throttle. They also have the sweeping dash clocks.
my current car had full service history, cambelt was done 10k prior to buying and 2 weeks later the belt snapped and car needed a full head rebuild which hurt lol
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Car Parts For Sale
1
18 November 2015 07:49 AM