MD321T to MD321V
has anyone done this or can shed any light ? thinking of upgrading while the engines out, would I need to change the lateral 56mm intake to the 76mm aswel ?
thanks in advance
P.S. anyone interested in the MD321T if I go ahead with it ?
thanks in advance
P.S. anyone interested in the MD321T if I go ahead with it ?
We are run MDX321T at 490bhp,with better heads we are still think T should make 500bhp on 20% methanol without the problem
MDX321V should be good upgrade,just depends for how much power you are looking.
If you have older non billet T,I would speak to Mark@Lateral Performance or Turbo Dynamics about the upgrading to the Billet,is really worth
Jura
MDX321V should be good upgrade,just depends for how much power you are looking.
If you have older non billet T,I would speak to Mark@Lateral Performance or Turbo Dynamics about the upgrading to the Billet,is really worth
Jura
I'm at 464bhp with just Vpower now and that's a none billet T, I was just thinking about breaking the 500bhp mark while the engine was out and what else would be involved. stil uuming and aahing lol
Trending Topics
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Pre Billet wheel, as I said, it was a while ago 
It felt exactly like what you see on the graph to be fair, bit less at the bottom, but more at the top, it's what happens when you fit a larger turbo.
As it happens, we're swapping a Billet T for a Billet V at the moment on a 2.5 equipped car. Just waiting on it's gearbox rebuild and we can get cracking.
It felt exactly like what you see on the graph to be fair, bit less at the bottom, but more at the top, it's what happens when you fit a larger turbo.
As it happens, we're swapping a Billet T for a Billet V at the moment on a 2.5 equipped car. Just waiting on it's gearbox rebuild and we can get cracking.
According to the graph the T gives more power than the V in most of the rev range.It has about 20bhp more in the midrange and it only looses to the V in the top end.You have to drive the car harder to get the gains from the V.I suspect the T is faster than the V in most of the tasks.I bet even in the quarter mile the T is only a little bit slower than the V though i dont have that much hands on experience as much as Martyn.How does a rotated Sc gt30 billet compares with these on the same or similar spec engine Martyn?Thanks
Last edited by Impreza sti jdm; Nov 1, 2012 at 10:25 AM.
Is that graph not slightly "hooky" Martyn? I understand if the power drops off like that on a DD RR, it's normally down to the car lifting out of the dyno and the rollers trying to catch-up. Obviously this effects the peak figures if that's the case as they normally get inflated under that scenario.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
According to the graph the T gives more power than the V in most of the rev range.It has about 20bhp more in the midrange and it only looses to the V in the top end.You have to drive the car harder to get the gains from the V.I suspect the T is faster than the V in most of the tasks.I bet even in the quarter mile the T is only a little bit slower than the V though i dont have that much hands on experience as much as Martyn.How does a rotated Sc gt30 billet compares with these on the same or similar spec engine Martyn?Thanks
Pre Billet wheel, as I said, it was a while ago 
It felt exactly like what you see on the graph to be fair, bit less at the bottom, but more at the top, it's what happens when you fit a larger turbo.
As it happens, we're swapping a Billet T for a Billet V at the moment on a 2.5 equipped car. Just waiting on it's gearbox rebuild and we can get cracking.
It felt exactly like what you see on the graph to be fair, bit less at the bottom, but more at the top, it's what happens when you fit a larger turbo.
As it happens, we're swapping a Billet T for a Billet V at the moment on a 2.5 equipped car. Just waiting on it's gearbox rebuild and we can get cracking.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
It's a forged motor, but as for the block itself it is a stock one.
It was a new block when it was built last year after the owners previous motor threw a rod.
We have ran stock block motors to 580bhp in the past and have plenty running around the 500bhp mark without issue.
It was a new block when it was built last year after the owners previous motor threw a rod.
We have ran stock block motors to 580bhp in the past and have plenty running around the 500bhp mark without issue.
Scooby Regular
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Is that graph not slightly "hooky" Martyn? I understand if the power drops off like that on a DD RR, it's normally down to the car lifting out of the dyno and the rollers trying to catch-up. Obviously this effects the peak figures if that's the case as they normally get inflated under that scenario.
The drop off was consistent with the drop in boost at the top end, not slipage !
The car ran a 10.82 1/4 mile, so you tell me, is it 500bhp or not ?
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Alan - don't take things so seriously and out of context!! I can see from Martyn's response it was a goood humoured (even if tongue in cheek).... perhaps it's your old age!
My inital comment was asking a question, not making a statement. My 2nd statement was tongue in cheek - you miserable old fart!
My inital comment was asking a question, not making a statement. My 2nd statement was tongue in cheek - you miserable old fart!
Scooby Regular
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
From: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping






