Notices

P1 and 2.5 Longevity Survey

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 April 2012, 04:56 PM
  #1  
weatherman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
weatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default P1 and 2.5 Longevity Survey

We all know about the P1's legendary fragility in the engine department and also the 2.5's weaknesses especially in STi hatch guise.

But I'm just wondering, have any P1s or 2.5s managed to reach 100k without breaking? And are most of these with a remap to soften the limiter?

Stuart
Old 17 April 2012, 04:57 PM
  #2  
type-rob
Scooby Regular
 
type-rob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: North West Yorkshire
Posts: 788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

All down to servicing I would say, and personally, I would never take my car to the limiter! Boost drops off before anyway!
Old 17 April 2012, 08:00 PM
  #3  
TonyBurns
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
TonyBurns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: 1600cc's of twin scroll fun :)
Posts: 25,565
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The P1 doesnt really have a fragile engine, its actually not too bad, the issues are with the sensitive MAF sensor and the JDM fuel map.
Sort (or keep on top) of the MAF sensor and remap for UK fuel and you should be ok
The 2.5's just suck

Tony
Old 18 April 2012, 12:11 AM
  #4  
diggingcontractor
Scooby Regular
 
diggingcontractor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: halifax
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

think it just depends if a tosser has owned it at some point my uncle has a p1 hes had it since it was 18 months old its done 125000 and runs sweet as a nut only runs it on vpower and regular sevices as rob says its in the servicing i have a hawkeye 2.5 engine is fine to be fare though its only done 30k
Old 18 April 2012, 12:22 AM
  #5  
craigo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
craigo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: surrey/west sussex
Posts: 3,189
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TonyBurns
The P1 doesnt really have a fragile engine, its actually not too bad, the issues are with the sensitive MAF sensor and the JDM fuel map.
Sort (or keep on top) of the MAF sensor and remap for UK fuel and you should be ok
The 2.5's just suck

Tony
as a previous P1 owner, these words are spot on. i cant comment on the 2.5 from personal ownership, but, i would never buy a car with the standard unit
Old 18 April 2012, 08:14 AM
  #6  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

seen the odd p1 in for mapping with over 100k on the clock and what appears to be the original engine.. but unusual for it not to have been mapped already and therefore not on the jdm map any more.

Dont recall a hatch having sdone over 100k, the odd high mileage hawk but not over 100k to my memory.

Simon
Old 18 April 2012, 12:01 PM
  #7  
weatherman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
weatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One 2.5 WRX at 127k on Autotrader though many more N/A 2.5 Outbacks and Legacies at this mileage - 137K the highest milage on sale at present. My dad's Legacy's engine went at 90k but I don't know the precise cause....

Last edited by weatherman; 18 April 2012 at 03:11 PM.
Old 18 April 2012, 01:28 PM
  #8  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Done 198k on a 2litre uk engine but title said p1 or 2.5 hatch?
Old 18 April 2012, 01:34 PM
  #9  
a5h
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
a5h's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: London
Posts: 1,778
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a 2.5 Hawk STI that i bought on 14K when it already had the head gasket failure. The dealer had to change the gaskets before i bought it. Although i did a deal with them to slip some forged pistons in awell.
Old 18 April 2012, 02:31 PM
  #10  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

100K+ on any post MY98 classic shape scoob is good going IMO. Exception is pre-98 JDM models (esp STi).

The UK 2.5 are unfortunate...I think they'd work better if they ran a twin scroll and lower compression or less boost/lower rev limit with studded heads.

Last edited by ALi-B; 18 April 2012 at 02:32 PM.
Old 18 April 2012, 03:10 PM
  #11  
weatherman
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
weatherman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You think the Pre-98 cars were more reliable?

My MY97 UK Turbo had already had a replacement block for Piston Slap when I got it and by 60k it was slapping again.

My 2001 Classic PPP Wagon was going strong at 114k when I traded it in.
Old 18 April 2012, 05:22 PM
  #12  
ALi-B
Moderator
Support Scoobynet!
iTrader: (1)
 
ALi-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: The hell where youth and laughter go
Posts: 38,034
Received 301 Likes on 240 Posts
Default

Post my98 mainly blew up due to undiagnosed MAF failures (it is possible to feel when a MAF is on its way out when driving them)...the P1 is included in this (along with it being fussy on fuel).

Pre-97 didn't slap unless heavily worn or forged. As well as the pistons, the pre97 has a different block made from a different alloy when they switched from sand casting to die casting, which maybe dampens the noise differently as the blocks have different metal thicknesses and density.

Slap was mainly on the MY97-98 cars, even then its non-issue IMO (as I had one myself). Its purely a piston expansion issue as post MY98 cars had the same block (open deck die-cast), crank, rods, heads etc.

Loads were replaced for piston slap; mine too, only for it to return under 10K miles later. I suspect I was called (the dealer called me) in because the dealer wanted to drum up some work. As it never used a drop of oil, and if garaged overnight was barely noticable. It always stopped when warm and it rarely did it in warmer summer months. Its still going today too and AFAIK not had a penny spent on the engine barring cambelts, tensioners and fluids....original MAF too

If tighter tolerance pistons of the same metal were fitted instead, it wouldn't slap, but it would probably seize up when driven hard.

As a point of interest though, slap is not uncommon; our old Rover 216/Honda concerto (honda engine) slapped when cold. Its replacement a 216 with a k-series slapped from new- as does every k-series engine I've ever heard. BMW M52 engines can slap and MK2 1.2 Clios do it as well (we had three as lease cars).

And my Monaro LS2 engine slapped far worse than all of them (8 pistons = twice as much sap ). The only exception is built EJ20s with aftermarket forged pistons...bloody hell they can be really bad!


IMO it is a far cry from a knackered big end(s), melted piston, ring failure or HG failure. All of which pretty much immobilise the car. A slappy engine thats not burning any oil probably would live just as long as a non-slappy one.

Last edited by ALi-B; 18 April 2012 at 05:25 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
55
05 August 2018 07:02 AM
Tarling
Subaru Parts
10
19 October 2015 07:58 PM
sedge69
Wanted
0
01 October 2015 09:44 PM
IanG1983
Subaru Parts
1
30 September 2015 04:52 PM
scoobiesteve103
ScoobyNet General
10
21 September 2015 09:33 AM



Quick Reply: P1 and 2.5 Longevity Survey



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:51 AM.