Anyone got any experience of a Sc36 or 38 on a Blob wrx ???
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Crawley
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Anyone got any experience of a Sc36 or 38 on a Blob wrx ???
Hi all looking to buy the above at some point soon for my Wrx Blob 2005 wondered what they are like ?? Currently got a similar spec turbo as the Sc38 but fell short of what it should of produced ( bought Second hand from here not to happy!! ) Anyway looking for around 350-60hp fast road setup
Cheers for your input!!
Cheers for your input!!
#3
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Enginetuner.co.uk Plymouth Dyno Dynamics RR Engine machining and building EcuTek SimTek mapping
Posts: 3,662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ask Martyn, he'll give you the whole story, having mapped plenty of them. 01752 345880 from 9 till 2 today.
#5
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
I've just bought a bugeye with a 2.1 "enginetuner" engine and an sc36. The sc36 is a *really* good fit for a daily driver, there is literally no lag with it. It feels like driving a big torquey NA engine. I honestly bought the car to steal the engine for my track car and return the bug to standard (who needs more than a td04 for a daily etc etc...), but it's so good that I'm going to keep it as it is as a daily driver as it is
I'd say that when it comes to turbo choice, it highly depends on what you want from the car, of course. I miss the great *WHACK* in the back I get from the 20g that I have in the other car, but in reality the sc36 is probably as fast or faster up 70+ than the 20g due to the way it delivers the power, but the 20g feels more "ballistic" once it's going.. I suspect the map on the new car is also made to be smooth, where-as the 20g map is "give me as much power as possible at any time"
Having said that, the 20g gets tiring to drive day to day, as it has to be kept on the boil as otherwise the car will not go anywhere fast, so if it's a true daily, then go for the smaller sc36. With the sc36 the car sits quite happily at 16-1700rpm and if I put my foot down the car will start accellerating. With the 20g, there is no chance of doing this. The sc36 car will happily sit in 5th at 40mph, where-as the ohter one will be in 4th *and not happy with it* - it feels like it'd prefer 3rd!!
Here's the sc36 graph on the bug:
and the deltadash for the 20g (on a 2 litre) - red lines:
The above graph was a map on part E85, and it's now been detuned to around 370 on normal v-power, but the power delivery is very similar.
Both cars have headers (RCM + Lateral) and are on 2.5" exhausts with a PPP backbox. The 2.1 has an STI TMIC and the 2.0 a Japspeed FMIC.
I'd say that when it comes to turbo choice, it highly depends on what you want from the car, of course. I miss the great *WHACK* in the back I get from the 20g that I have in the other car, but in reality the sc36 is probably as fast or faster up 70+ than the 20g due to the way it delivers the power, but the 20g feels more "ballistic" once it's going.. I suspect the map on the new car is also made to be smooth, where-as the 20g map is "give me as much power as possible at any time"
Having said that, the 20g gets tiring to drive day to day, as it has to be kept on the boil as otherwise the car will not go anywhere fast, so if it's a true daily, then go for the smaller sc36. With the sc36 the car sits quite happily at 16-1700rpm and if I put my foot down the car will start accellerating. With the 20g, there is no chance of doing this. The sc36 car will happily sit in 5th at 40mph, where-as the ohter one will be in 4th *and not happy with it* - it feels like it'd prefer 3rd!!
Here's the sc36 graph on the bug:
and the deltadash for the 20g (on a 2 litre) - red lines:
The above graph was a map on part E85, and it's now been detuned to around 370 on normal v-power, but the power delivery is very similar.
Both cars have headers (RCM + Lateral) and are on 2.5" exhausts with a PPP backbox. The 2.1 has an STI TMIC and the 2.0 a Japspeed FMIC.
#7
Scooby Regular
If it's on a stock motor, the 36 is a fantastic choice.
Mapped one very recently with subtle mods that made effortless power and had very little loss of response from the TD04 that was removed.
Mapped one very recently with subtle mods that made effortless power and had very little loss of response from the TD04 that was removed.
Trending Topics
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Crawley
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Guys for your input think ive decided on the sc36 as it seems to tick all the boxes . Low lag, Good power and as its a daily driver it suits my driving style as the turbo fitted at the moment has alot of lag but when on boost pulls hard but you have to hang off 6k rpm all the time which is not me lol , Think i better get saving !!
#9
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Crawley
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hi martin, Was that graph from a Wrx? if so What kind of mods supported that kind of figure? I'm Running my07 Sti top mount and tray, full decat ,k&n panel filter,3 port solenoid,hawk sti injectors,Ngk 7 plugs and ecutek software . With a sc36 what kind of figure would you like to see after a mapping session ?
#11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Yes, it's honestly so much better than I thought it would be - very, very nice indeed
I've seen a few modified cars now, and they usually feel like they're about to have stuff fall off them, but this one is really well screwed together.
The engine feels like a powerful OEM engine as well, none of the "modified" feel to it.
I've seen a few modified cars now, and they usually feel like they're about to have stuff fall off them, but this one is really well screwed together.
The engine feels like a powerful OEM engine as well, none of the "modified" feel to it.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Taunton
Posts: 260
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#18
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Also, my other WRX (2003) has been running a TD05-20g for the last 5 years at various power levels above 350, and the gearbox is still going strong (This includes track days as well as normal a+b road driving (around 24k miles in total)). The only thing I've changed is the clutch to an exedy one and a lightened flywheel.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post