Notices

claasic parallel fuel rail question?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 14 August 2011, 11:39 AM
  #1  
super_ted
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
super_ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default claasic parallel fuel rail question?

Just after some advice really, i'm in the process of heading as close to 340-350bhp on my 96' sti as i can. So far i have, Changed turbo for a TD05 18g as mine was shagged, sourced some pink 550cc side feed injectors, sourced stainless manifold, heat wrapped & fitted, 3'' down pipe, de catted, etc. Have a apexi fc power commander ecu & controller & already have a 3 port boost valve fitted along with large front mount intercooler. Also done fuel pump upgrade, along with swirl pot mounted in the boot.
I'm nearly ready to make to call to JGM to book in for mapping to commence.

My question is, is it worth the hassle of fitting parallel fuel rails with the set up?? or is it not really necessarily needed? I have searched it but couldn't really come to a conclusion

Cheers.

Last edited by super_ted; 14 August 2011 at 11:58 AM. Reason: i'm not awake yet!
Old 14 August 2011, 11:43 AM
  #2  
m@t STImulation
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
m@t STImulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you will need a electronic boost controller if you want to got over 1.1 bar. JGM will tell you the same thing apexi avcr is a nice product
Old 14 August 2011, 12:05 PM
  #3  
m@t STImulation
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
m@t STImulation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,445
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my advise would be ask JGM i know he puts piston no.3 on a higher percentage as its the last to get fuel on the standard set up. a parallel setup is a safer option though.
Old 14 August 2011, 01:13 PM
  #4  
super_ted
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
super_ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've sent Simon a link to this thread.
Old 14 August 2011, 01:14 PM
  #5  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What ever you do dont fit a cheap crap fuel pressure reg, stick with fuelab, sx, aeromotive etc.

Debatable whether parrellel needed at this level, probably spend the money better elsewhere.

As Matt points out need either apexi map sensor or a boost controller whic is the advantage of a simtek over powerfc as cost of powerfc + boost controller + mapping equals a simtek fitted and mapped.

Simon
Old 14 August 2011, 05:10 PM
  #6  
super_ted
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (30)
 
super_ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok cheers, this is what i thought. If i stick with the standard rails then, would i need an adjustable fuel pressure reg anyway?
I went with the power fc as i got it for a decent price second hand, so should still work out cheaper than a simtek - fingers crossed.
Old 14 August 2011, 06:59 PM
  #7  
mickywrx
Unmapped 12.4s @ 105
iTrader: (29)
 
mickywrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Newcastle. 330bhp-289lb/ft @ 1bar boost - 12.4s @ 105mph
Posts: 11,776
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Post

Adjustable fuel regulator wouldn't be a bad idea if you stick with the standard rails, IMO.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Darrell@Scoobyworx
Trader Announcements
26
30 January 2024 01:27 PM
Phil3822
ScoobyNet General
33
02 October 2015 03:22 AM
ALEXSTI
General Technical
5
28 September 2015 09:29 PM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM
joe v3sti
ScoobyNet General
2
28 September 2015 08:59 AM



Quick Reply: claasic parallel fuel rail question?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:28 PM.