Definitve Advice on Resonator Delete Required
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: LINCOLN
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Definitve Advice on Resonator Delete Required
I want to get rid of the resonator baffle in the inner wing on my 05 STi...simply for a little more induction noise/weight saving.
all i plan to do is saw off the baffle and seal the opening with duct tape...something i have heard other folk doing without spending a £200 on a Prova item!
so the question is this...by removing this part of the resonator will it cause any damage to the MAF/engine due to increased airflow or cause it to overboost or anything like that due to unpredictable air speed/volume?
i want to do this tomorrow but dont want to screw the car up...obviously. any advice from those that have done this or those that know about such consequences gratefully received.
all i plan to do is saw off the baffle and seal the opening with duct tape...something i have heard other folk doing without spending a £200 on a Prova item!
so the question is this...by removing this part of the resonator will it cause any damage to the MAF/engine due to increased airflow or cause it to overboost or anything like that due to unpredictable air speed/volume?
i want to do this tomorrow but dont want to screw the car up...obviously. any advice from those that have done this or those that know about such consequences gratefully received.
#2
so the question is this...by removing this part of the resonator will it cause any damage to the MAF/engine due to increased airflow
or cause it to overboost or anything like that due to unpredictable air speed/volume?
From the data I got, the output of the MAF sensor becomes noticeably "spiky", presumably because the resonator plays a role in removing turbulence from the inlet air, and without it, the air travelling through the measurement tube is significantly "rougher" and hence difficult to measure consistently. Think of the difference between a smooth flowing river and white water.
The ECU contains an error correction mechanism designed to smooth out/correct "normal" measurement fluctuations, but the spikes I was seeing were getting through that and causing noticeable variation in load calculation (and hence mixture/ignition timing), and as a result, the ECUs ability to control the engine becomes less precise.
The bottom line is that I found the airflow measurement tracks more consistently and accurately (and I can map the car more exactingly) with the resonator fitted than without it.
i want to do this tomorrow but dont want to screw the car up...obviously. any advice from those that have done this or those that know about such consequences gratefully received.
Last edited by Splitpin; 20 October 2010 at 04:02 PM.
#4
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: LINCOLN
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks Splitpin...i am quite happy to take your advice as definitive. i was always led to believe that the baffle/resonator was simply to allow Subaru to pass drive by noise regulations...but reading your response it would appear that it has a role to play in smoothing the airflow pass the maf. kinda makes sense i guess. removing it would take out that consistency. i think i will leave well alone...thanks for your advice, much appreciated.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM