Notices

MD321T

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 17 October 2010, 07:26 PM
  #1  
Billet
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Billet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Mids
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default MD321T

hi, i am going to put a MD321T on my 2.0 sti. i am looking for around 460 - 470 bhp and 400 ft/pounds of torque, basically a very rapid road car. i will be doing handling and braking mods but i want to know whether i can get that figure from a T with the following mods:

FMIC
CAI
BOSCH FUEL PUMP
650 CC INJECTORS OR BIGGER
FULL 3 INCH DECAT
GT SPEC HEADERS AND UP PIPE

also would i need any other mods at this power level for example an oil cooler.

i know this is a lot of power for a standard 2.0 sti, but so many are coping with T's and a few i have heard of with 522 and 540 bhp.

Thanks
Old 17 October 2010, 07:39 PM
  #2  
kiranbaloo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
kiranbaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Reading,in a 516/460 classic 2.0 wagon quite lively!!
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You have to run high boost to make that figure on a 2.0 mine made 480bhp/450ftlb at 2bar on a forged eng with sti5 heads I would also recommend getting an uppipe from Harvey to go on the 3bolt headers as this will give you earlier spool and better torque.
At this figure the car is an animal
Old 17 October 2010, 08:01 PM
  #3  
B0DSKI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
B0DSKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Owner of BrCarDetailing
Posts: 10,626
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Harvey up pipe 100% recomended. On standard internals your gonna have to run 10-20% Meth to get to 470Bhp.
Old 17 October 2010, 08:08 PM
  #4  
kiranbaloo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
kiranbaloo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Reading,in a 516/460 classic 2.0 wagon quite lively!!
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thought I put in the above post'Doh'that figure was with 10lit meth to
a tank.It made 455/425 on vpower at 1.8 bar
Old 17 October 2010, 08:11 PM
  #5  
Billet
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Billet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Mids
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok cheers lads, will probably use some meth.
Old 17 October 2010, 08:13 PM
  #6  
B0DSKI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
B0DSKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Owner of BrCarDetailing
Posts: 10,626
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nice figures Kiran.

If the OP is running standard ECU then he's limited to 1.55 Bar unless he has AVCR or similiar.

Tbh i'd not get hooked up on figures too much. Mine runs 1.4Bar & 425Bhp and still seems plenty quick enough to me. May get to 440 When the FMIC goes on but even then the Maf is pretty much maxed out
Old 17 October 2010, 08:13 PM
  #7  
B0DSKI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
B0DSKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Owner of BrCarDetailing
Posts: 10,626
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nice figures Kiran.

If the OP is running standard ECU then he's limited to 1.55 Bar unless he has AVCR or similiar.

Tbh i'd not get hooked up on figures too much. Mine runs 1.4Bar & 425Bhp and still seems plenty quick enough to me. May get to 440 When the FMIC goes on but even then the Maf is pretty much maxed out
Old 17 October 2010, 10:29 PM
  #8  
typeRv4
Scooby Regular
 
typeRv4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

650cc might be getting a bit close to maxing out.
Old 17 October 2010, 10:45 PM
  #9  
Megaman
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Megaman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Leeds
Posts: 452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dont forget to get a decent clutch for that sort of power level
Old 21 October 2010, 12:17 PM
  #10  
eggy790
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
eggy790's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Taz any update on your plans? or which route you are heading?
Old 21 October 2010, 12:33 PM
  #11  
dynamix
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
dynamix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: near you
Posts: 9,708
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by typeRv4
650cc might be getting a bit close to maxing out.
They will be especially if running 20% methanol.

Will hit those figures and will need either aftermarket ecu to run mafless or avcr and a big maf induction kit to be able to do it on the std ecu.
Old 21 October 2010, 06:03 PM
  #12  
bluenose172
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
bluenose172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by B0DSKI
Nice figures Kiran.

If the OP is running standard ECU then he's limited to 1.55 Bar unless he has AVCR or similiar.

Tbh i'd not get hooked up on figures too much. Mine runs 1.4Bar & 425Bhp and still seems plenty quick enough to me. May get to 440 When the FMIC goes on but even then the Maf is pretty much maxed out
He's not limited to 1.55bar running the stock ECU.
Old 21 October 2010, 08:03 PM
  #13  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Tazz
hi, i am going to put a MD321T on my 2.0 sti. i am looking for around 460 - 470 bhp and 400 ft/pounds of torque, basically a very rapid road car. i will be doing handling and braking mods but i want to know whether i can get that figure from a T with the following mods:

FMIC
CAI
BOSCH FUEL PUMP
650 CC INJECTORS OR BIGGER
FULL 3 INCH DECAT
GT SPEC HEADERS AND UP PIPE

also would i need any other mods at this power level for example an oil cooler.

i know this is a lot of power for a standard 2.0 sti, but so many are coping with T's and a few i have heard of with 522 and 540 bhp.

Thanks
I think you are being very optomistic but wish you well in your endeavours. On straight V-Power with the best possible supporting mods you may struggle to exceed 450 bhp.
The problem with the CAK is getting a big enough filter on the end of it and all the cold air kits I have seen that I have been involved with have shown big power gains from fitting a trumpet and large cone in place of the CAK and I can give several specific examples. It does of course help to shield the cone from breathing warm engine bay air.
If you plan to run methanol your 650cc injectors are way too small.
Your choice of proven components is critical.
Are you saying that 321Ts are actually making 520-540 bhp? Forgive me but I am a little sceptical but happy to learn.
Old 21 October 2010, 08:29 PM
  #14  
B0DSKI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
B0DSKI's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Owner of BrCarDetailing
Posts: 10,626
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by bluenose172
He's not limited to 1.55bar running the stock ECU.
Why
Old 21 October 2010, 11:16 PM
  #15  
Billet
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (60)
 
Billet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: West Mids
Posts: 2,567
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

no the people running 522 and 540 are on rotated set ups and garretts, no way can a t achieve over 470 max . i will probably get a avcr a big maf pipe. eggy mate i haven't decided yet, will let you know if its anytime soon.

Thanks Peoples
Old 22 October 2010, 04:12 PM
  #16  
Mus
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Mus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: will be back in another scooby in time....
Posts: 2,554
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

522 on vpower i dont think that will ever happen, but the H did make 490something on race fuel so if the same is applied for T then yes possibly.
Old 22 October 2010, 04:29 PM
  #17  
The Stitcher
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (12)
 
The Stitcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: south wales rhondda
Posts: 4,067
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tazz
hi, i am going to put a MD321T on my 2.0 sti. i am looking for around 460 - 470 bhp and 400 ft/pounds of torque, basically a very rapid road car. i will be doing handling and braking mods but i want to know whether i can get that figure from a T with the following mods:

FMIC
CAI
BOSCH FUEL PUMP
650 CC INJECTORS OR BIGGER
FULL 3 INCH DECAT
GT SPEC HEADERS AND UP PIPE

also would i need any other mods at this power level for example an oil cooler.

i know this is a lot of power for a standard 2.0 sti, but so many are coping with T's and a few i have heard of with 522 and 540 bhp.

Thanks
other mods would be clutch/ gearbox maybe fuel reg and cross your fingers how long the standard engine will last you at that power with out using uprated internals
Old 22 October 2010, 06:18 PM
  #18  
Sleiper STI
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Sleiper STI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

correct me if im wrong guys but i'm looking to go down this road aswel, am i right in saying with the md i could run standard internals and be in the region of 400-430 and be ok? also it isnt the bhp that kills the bottom end its the amount of boost isn't it, whats the safest limit 1.6 bar or there abouts?

Last edited by Sleiper STI; 22 October 2010 at 06:20 PM.
Old 22 October 2010, 07:31 PM
  #19  
eggy790
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
eggy790's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

well i should be running duncans md321v on mine, i'll let you know how long it lasts in the new year lol
Old 22 October 2010, 07:51 PM
  #20  
bern11
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
bern11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by eggy790
well i should be running duncans md321v on mine, i'll let you know how long it lasts in the new year lol
What's your plans eggy??
Old 22 October 2010, 08:54 PM
  #21  
eggy790
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (20)
 
eggy790's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: n/a
Posts: 5,304
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

gt spec headers, 740s.. harvey up pipe, md321v act clutch and syvecs ecu for now.. proper engine build.. i.e. 2.1 by the looks of things.. and then just driver tuition

o and not forgetting supporting mods.. oil cooler, catch tank etc.
Old 26 October 2010, 01:12 AM
  #22  
no1nutter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
no1nutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so am i correct in thinking it is possible to achieve these figures on a standard sti setup although using meth mix? if so how would it compare to using md321h with meth and all supporting mods?
Old 28 October 2010, 07:07 PM
  #23  
no1nutter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
no1nutter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by no1nutter
so am i correct in thinking it is possible to achieve these figures on a standard sti setup although using meth mix? if so how would it compare to using md321h with meth and all supporting mods?
any1?
Old 30 October 2010, 11:19 AM
  #24  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

As you already have the turbo why not try it and let us know what you find.
Take extreme care with methanol as it is carsogenic, absorbed in to the skin, highly flammable and burns with a clear flame making it even more dangerous. I am told there are cases of ignition just from the static or whatever from a mobile phone.
A good remap with a set percentage methanol and see what your gains are but you are then committed to running methanol all the time unless you have two maps. If the car is used for long journeys, carrying methanol around to perform the operation at a filling station becomes a real pain.
Old 30 October 2010, 08:32 PM
  #25  
typeRv4
Scooby Regular
 
typeRv4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

"Methanol or its solutions are not classified as carcinogens; methanol is not considered to
be a cancer causing agent"

But yes be carefull with it as it is very toxic, mind you petrols not exactly good for you either...

Oddly enough you can find very small amounts of methanol in alot alcoholic drinks.

"All types of alcoholic drinks contain some methanol, a substance blamed for the worst hangovers. Whiskey, cheap red wine, fruit brandy and other dark spirits contain the most methanol, sometimes as much as 2% by volume. Vodka and other clear drinks contain the least. In the liver, methanol takes 10 times longer than ethanol to break down."
Old 31 October 2010, 09:32 PM
  #26  
harvey
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
 
harvey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Darlington
Posts: 10,419
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Thanks for that correction. Not as nasty as I thought then.

http://cartwright.chem.ox.ac.uk/hsci.../methanol.html
Old 31 October 2010, 11:46 PM
  #27  
dnc
Scooby Regular
 
dnc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by harvey
As you already have the turbo why not try it and let us know what you find.
Take extreme care with methanol as it is carsogenic, absorbed in to the skin, highly flammable and burns with a clear flame making it even more dangerous. I am told there are cases of ignition just from the static or whatever from a mobile phone.
A good remap with a set percentage methanol and see what your gains are but you are then committed to running methanol all the time unless you have two maps. If the car is used for long journeys, carrying methanol around to perform the operation at a filling station becomes a real pain.
How do you guys transport the methanol - surely you need a dangerous goods carriage license ? Be interesting to see what action police would take if anyone got caught............
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Belly07
Subaru
2
12 November 2015 03:46 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
02 October 2015 09:22 AM
Jon1187
Wanted
3
17 September 2015 08:29 AM



Quick Reply: MD321T



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:08 AM.