Notices

2.5" Cat-back compared to 3" Cat-Back

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 February 2010, 01:12 AM
  #1  
ben wrx
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ben wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2.5" Cat-back compared to 3" Cat-Back

Hi Guys,

Currently running a H&S downpipe narrowing to 2.5" then a magnex 2.5" centre section, straight through pipe and a 2.5" Afterburner backbox.

What gains would be made if I changed to a 3" system from the 2.5" downpipe, ie Nur Spec R system or the Ninja 3" or possibly the Revolution system.

Couple of questions, would you notice the difference in power, torque, turbo spool up etc. My car is currently mapped for the 2.5", is a re map required?

Any advise or previous experience with the above would be great.

PS car is a Version 5 Type RA Ltd with a lateral 2.1 stroker engine and a VF35 Turbo.


Thanks Ben
Old 16 February 2010, 06:23 AM
  #2  
sonicwrex
Scooby Newbie
 
sonicwrex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Brighton MA
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

if the whole exhaust was 3" maybe you'd notice but if your previous 2.5 was pretty wideopen than you won't notice too much with a change to 3" because you still have a bottle neck due to the downpipe taper. I wouldn't mess with it until you get a BIG turbo and then you'd probably want the whole thing to be 3".
Old 16 February 2010, 09:51 AM
  #3  
ben wrx
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ben wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I understand your post regarding the bottleneck, although I thought nearly all down pipes narrowed to 2.5".

Anyone swapped between the 2 sizes?
Old 17 February 2010, 12:47 PM
  #4  
ben wrx
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ben wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Anyone
Old 17 February 2010, 01:23 PM
  #5  
jonny_693
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
jonny_693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hudds
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Interested in this aswell.
Old 17 February 2010, 03:14 PM
  #6  
midnight
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (10)
 
midnight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Coventry
Posts: 2,321
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

The current system you have on your car is pretty much free flowing ,by increasing the size of the bore wont add that much extra bhp/ torque to the engine.Some tuners will advise you to go for a 3 inch system depending upon how far you are going with modding your car,but most will tell you a good 2.5 inch system will see good power gains depending on the system/make purchased.
Old 17 February 2010, 05:48 PM
  #7  
andy97
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
andy97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Api 500+bhp MD321T @91dB Probably SN's longest owner of an Impreza Turbo
Posts: 6,296
Received 118 Likes on 103 Posts
Default

Andy forrest's track car has more than 450bhp and uses a 2.5" exhaust. I know another that has in excess of 500bhp with a 2.5 smelly pipe.

You don't really a 3" exhaust unless you are going for silly power

Andy
Old 18 February 2010, 06:13 PM
  #8  
ben wrx
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ben wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Andy forrest's track car has more than 450bhp and uses a 2.5" exhaust. I know another that has in excess of 500bhp with a 2.5 smelly pipe.

You don't really a 3" exhaust unless you are going for silly power

Andy
Thats a Fair Point.

Still would like to know on a back to back test, what the difference would be?
Old 18 February 2010, 09:32 PM
  #9  
tommytorque
Scooby Newbie
 
tommytorque's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bigger top end, bit more lag
Old 18 February 2010, 11:23 PM
  #10  
ben wrx
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
ben wrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 143
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I would have thought less lag as it's less restrictive, am I missing something?
Old 22 February 2010, 09:37 AM
  #11  
jonny_693
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
jonny_693's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Hudds
Posts: 1,788
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tommytorque
bigger top end, bit more lag
Well I have just swapped my 2.5 downpipe back to a 3 inch and can confirm this is definately the case. I prefer it, the extra lag outweighs the extra top end performace imo.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dan-
Suspension
4
27 October 2015 12:12 PM
alcazar
Non Scooby Related
7
02 October 2015 06:08 PM
Welloilbeefhooked
General Technical
0
11 September 2015 06:49 PM
Doofus
ScoobyNet General
13
25 January 2001 05:06 PM



Quick Reply: 2.5" Cat-back compared to 3" Cat-Back



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:19 AM.