Notices

strong crank for v3?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 24 August 2009, 06:18 PM
  #1  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default strong crank for v3?

hi,
im after a crank for a v3 sti with center thrust bearing, that will handle 500+bhp, anyone got any names and prices,
cheers phil.
Old 24 August 2009, 06:49 PM
  #2  
merlin24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
merlin24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: RM Performance
Posts: 3,032
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its not normally the crank which is the "weakest link" - its the standard 'nut' type rods.
The later V7 STi 'bolt' type rods were much better, but at that power you want the best forged rods you can afford to fit tbh.
Standard crank would take it but if you want to push the power much higher, then dig deep and get a Billet crank.

Mick
Old 25 August 2009, 06:06 PM
  #3  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks mick, i have the H-beam rods and getting forged pistons, its just the crank i need to replace, so is a standard v3 sti crank good enough for around 500bhp?
Old 26 August 2009, 04:56 PM
  #4  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

anyone?
Old 27 August 2009, 05:58 PM
  #5  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

???
Old 27 August 2009, 06:05 PM
  #6  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

Yes it is but for peace of mind I would go for the nitrided crank from a v9 JDM car, it is stronger and has better oil flow as it is cross drilled.

Banny
Old 27 August 2009, 06:10 PM
  #7  
jabbawockymark
Scooby Regular
 
jabbawockymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i have a roger clark motor sport 2.5 crank was £400 with h beam rods and woosner pistons this crank is very good but i wouldnt stay with center thrust i would have your block converted to end thrust but thats my thought thats what i had done when i had me 2.3 stroker fitted
Old 27 August 2009, 06:12 PM
  #8  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yes they are good, i had one of them in my other engine but ill need to have this engine macined to take the end thrust bearing and i didnt want to do that, is there anything with the mid thrust that are strong enough for 500?
Old 27 August 2009, 06:16 PM
  #9  
jabbawockymark
Scooby Regular
 
jabbawockymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

you can get a v9 crank that are very strong centre thrust i had one in a sti running 450 bhp

i would of thought you will have to have your engine bored out to fit race spec pistons anyway?

Last edited by jabbawockymark; 27 August 2009 at 06:18 PM.
Old 27 August 2009, 06:20 PM
  #10  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

whats a 2.3 stroker, has it been bored that much?
Old 27 August 2009, 06:25 PM
  #11  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

You used a EJ22 block with a 2.5 crank, stroker rods and pistons to get a capacity of 2.35.

Banny
Old 27 August 2009, 06:27 PM
  #12  
jabbawockymark
Scooby Regular
 
jabbawockymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

he got it fella
Old 27 August 2009, 06:28 PM
  #13  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

aah, so is it possible to use a 2.5 crank on a 2L and bore it out to 1mm over? what length rods would that need?
Old 27 August 2009, 06:33 PM
  #14  
jabbawockymark
Scooby Regular
 
jabbawockymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yer my engine iam building now has a 2.5 crank then h beam manley rods with woosner pistons engine has been boored for the pistons this will be a 2.2 stroker with sti heads that have been ported polished also full race spec cams with high lifters so theres loads of ways of doing it
Old 27 August 2009, 06:34 PM
  #15  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

You'd still need to machine the block for rear thrust.

If you're determined to have a crank big enough for big power but have a centre thrust crank then RCMS do a crank that will fit in either.

Be warned it aint cheap and you could get your block machined for rear thrust, buy the bearings, by a new 2.5 crank and still have a grand left over. Your best bet really is to just get the block machined. Most if not all the big power 2.35 have had this done so I dont see why you're against it.

Last edited by dazdavies; 27 August 2009 at 06:36 PM.
Old 27 August 2009, 06:36 PM
  #16  
dazdavies
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (22)
 
dazdavies's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: N/A
Posts: 7,061
Received 82 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jabbawockymark
yer my engine iam building now has a 2.5 crank then h beam manley rods with woosner pistons engine has been boored for the pistons this will be a 2.2 stroker with sti heads that have been ported polished also full race spec cams with high lifters so theres loads of ways of doing it

Didn't realise manley made stroker rods and wossner made stroker pistons.
Old 27 August 2009, 06:39 PM
  #17  
jabbawockymark
Scooby Regular
 
jabbawockymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dazdavies
Didn't realise manley made stroker rods and wossner made stroker pistons.
yes mate they do i have them running in my car and 2 others the 2.2 stroker kit is very fast indeed
Old 27 August 2009, 06:40 PM
  #18  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i like the idea of that, the other block i have is a cdb thats been machined for the end thrust and bored .5 over, so may just bore that to 1mm, use the H-beam rods i have, then all i need would be a 2.5 crank end thrust and pistons to match the 1mm over bore, is that right?
Old 27 August 2009, 06:44 PM
  #19  
jabbawockymark
Scooby Regular
 
jabbawockymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thewhitewarrior
i like the idea of that, the other block i have is a cdb thats been machined for the end thrust and bored .5 over, so may just bore that to 1mm, use the H-beam rods i have, then all i need would be a 2.5 crank end thrust and pistons to match the 1mm over bore, is that right?
well depends on what pistons you use some are 0.7 some are 0.5 some are bigger bore size so just depends on the piston wossners are very good just love the sound the make my car rocks when ticking over sounds very deep
Old 27 August 2009, 06:47 PM
  #20  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice, aint it exciting when ya find out something new,
so is there any size difference in the rod length or would i use the same as the 2L?
Old 27 August 2009, 06:49 PM
  #21  
jabbawockymark
Scooby Regular
 
jabbawockymark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: chelmsford
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by thewhitewarrior
nice, aint it exciting when ya find out something new,
so is there any size difference in the rod length or would i use the same as the 2L?
well you can have standard size or go with a shorter rod like i did then you get more conbustion the more conbustion the better lol
Old 27 August 2009, 07:01 PM
  #22  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

right, sorry to go on with the questions but i will go this way and need to know what im looking for, so where will i get shorter rods and what price? also the 2.5 crank, will it fit in the machined end thrust cdb i have with no probs?
Old 27 August 2009, 07:30 PM
  #23  
merlin24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
merlin24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: RM Performance
Posts: 3,032
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If your going down the Stroker route Phil, you will need stroker rods and pistons (as you are increasing the stroke by 4mm with the 2.5 crank) as mentioned above,so try Mark @ Lateral Performance for a price on the parts.

92.50mm bore with a 2.5 crank = 2.1 Stroker.
97.50mm bore with a 2.5 crank = 2.35 Stroker.

The EJ257 crank is rear thrust so will fit your rear thrust block.
Early EJ25 cranks were centre thrust and had a 48mm big end journal - so no good for the 52 mm Impreza rods.

Mick

Last edited by merlin24; 27 August 2009 at 07:33 PM. Reason: added to
Old 27 August 2009, 08:23 PM
  #24  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by merlin24
Its not normally the crank which is the "weakest link" - its the standard 'nut' type rods. The later V7 STi 'bolt' type rods were much better...
Mick, are the Blobeye "v.8" and Hawkeye "v.9" STi rods the "bolt" type too?

Last edited by joz8968; 27 August 2009 at 08:25 PM.
Old 27 August 2009, 09:25 PM
  #25  
banny sti
Scooby Senior
iTrader: (68)
 
banny sti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Type R
Posts: 16,598
Received 22 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

All newage rods are bolt type afaik, only the pistons were different from v7-v8/9

Banny
Old 27 August 2009, 11:58 PM
  #26  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Cheers banny. :-)

Is it possible to swap over pistons WITHOUT unbolting the rods from the big end journals and extracting the rod/piston assy.? i.e. can you release/extract the circlip/gudgeon pins via that 'inspection' hole thing, so as to be able to extract the pistons out of the top of the block?

Or do you have to take it all apart (inc. crank) and always do a full, proper rebuild, etc...?
Old 28 August 2009, 12:04 AM
  #27  
bluerigster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
bluerigster's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: On MLR
Posts: 1,280
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
Cheers banny. :-)

Is it possible to swap over pistons WITHOUT unbolting the rods from the big end journals and extracting the rod/piston assy.? i.e. can you release/extract the circlip/gudgeon pins via that 'inspection' hole thing, so as to be able to extract the pistons out of the top of the block?

Or do you have to take it all apart (inc. crank) and always do a full, proper rebuild, etc...?
You can remove the pistons without splitting the block.
Old 28 August 2009, 05:11 PM
  #28  
thewhitewarrior
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
thewhitewarrior's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: in the engine bay
Posts: 909
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by merlin24
If your going down the Stroker route Phil, you will need stroker rods and pistons (as you are increasing the stroke by 4mm with the 2.5 crank) as mentioned above,so try Mark @ Lateral Performance for a price on the parts.

92.50mm bore with a 2.5 crank = 2.1 Stroker.
97.50mm bore with a 2.5 crank = 2.35 Stroker.

The EJ257 crank is rear thrust so will fit your rear thrust block.
Early EJ25 cranks were centre thrust and had a 48mm big end journal - so no good for the 52 mm Impreza rods.

Mick
thanks mick,
you always explane things well, so if i bore the block a further .5mm to 1mm over it will be close to a 2.2 also?
thanks for the help , ill make enquires for prices.
phil.
Old 28 August 2009, 07:04 PM
  #29  
merlin24
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
merlin24's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: RM Performance
Posts: 3,032
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

No probs Phil - boring to 93mm should give you approx 2147cc depending on the build spec.

Mick
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
KAS35RSTI
Subaru
27
04 November 2021 07:12 PM
just me
Non Scooby Related
26
03 January 2020 11:12 AM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
12
18 November 2015 07:03 AM
IAN WR1
ScoobyNet General
8
28 September 2015 08:14 PM



Quick Reply: strong crank for v3?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 PM.