Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

2.5 or 3" system?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #1  
weeebell's Avatar
weeebell
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire
Default 2.5 or 3" system?

Will a 2.5" system be ok to use with a vf35 on my 01 WRX?

I've had a look at some downpipes and all I can find are 3" downpipes with the 2.5" ends on the that connect to the standard system. But I have also found a 2.5" stainless system that will fit the rest of my car.

Will this be ok for around 340-350bhp (as I think that'll be the max I can get out the vf35)

Or has anyone ever bought one of these
SUBARU IMPREZA NEW AGE STAINLESS STEEL EXHAUST SYSTEM on eBay, also Exhaust Components, Performance Tuning Parts, Car Tuning Styling, Cars, Parts Vehicles (end time 22-Nov-08 14:00:00 GMT)
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 08:48 PM
  #2  
maydew's Avatar
maydew
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
From: midlands
Default

2.5 will be sound you dont want to oversize the system,and i wouldnt bother with that system,i have never used one or know anyone with one but i wouldnt imagine those flexi joints will last on the up pipe
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 10:55 PM
  #3  
samcowrx's Avatar
samcowrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: Oxford- the shire
Default

3 inch straight through mate, get a good branded one like magnex (bust) or hks
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 11:02 PM
  #4  
maydew's Avatar
maydew
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
From: midlands
Default

unless he intends on getting a built engine i wouldnt put a 3" on a standard engine,it will do nothing for it performance wise(may even make it slower and more lag than a 2.5" would) just make noise
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 11:04 PM
  #5  
DaveBeck's Avatar
DaveBeck
412/425 of forged love
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,238
Likes: 0
From: www.surreyscoobies.com
Default

went from 3" which tapered down to 2.5" at joints. to a true 3" and the diff was quality. earlier spool and more grunt. that was a t 360bhp, not sure what difference that would make
Reply
Old Nov 15, 2008 | 11:08 PM
  #6  
maydew's Avatar
maydew
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
From: midlands
Default

have heard that is a good set up,i think it was david at api that made the comment
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 10:03 AM
  #7  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Originally Posted by maydew
unless he intends on getting a built engine i wouldnt put a 3" on a standard engine,it will do nothing for it performance wise(may even make it slower and more lag than a 2.5" would) just make noise
It will be noisier, but moving from a 2.5" to a 3" turbo-back system on any turbocharged engine is NOT going to make it slower and more laggy. In fact it will improve things.

The system between the exhaust ports and the turbine inlet are the thing that will make the difference in lag, spool up, outright power etc.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 10:17 AM
  #8  
sy.'s Avatar
sy.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: west mids
Default

on my00 uk i srapped my 2.5" magnex system and went for a full hks 3" supper dragger turbo back (slip jointed) with great improvement and this is with a vf35
currently giving 332bhp @ 1.4 bar with 440s @ 3.5bar
the 2.5" vs 3" exhaust debate does a lot dep on the quality of the exhaust as much as the bore size IMO
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 12:06 PM
  #9  
weeebell's Avatar
weeebell
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire
Default

If its a poorer quality exhaust, would heat wrapping it help?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 12:46 PM
  #10  
mantazini's Avatar
mantazini
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 3,135
Likes: 0
From: MSOC
Default

Have a look in here matey, it's second hand but quality stuff for right amount of money...

JPP : TuningParts for Sale


Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 01:00 PM
  #11  
weeebell's Avatar
weeebell
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire
Default

Originally Posted by weeebell
Will a 2.5" system be ok to use with a vf35 on my 01 WRX?

I've had a look at some downpipes and all I can find are 3" downpipes with the 2.5" ends on the that connect to the standard system. But I have also found a 2.5" stainless system that will fit the rest of my car.

Will this be ok for around 340-350bhp (as I think that'll be the max I can get out the vf35)

Or has anyone ever bought one of these
SUBARU IMPREZA NEW AGE STAINLESS STEEL EXHAUST SYSTEM on eBay, also Exhaust Components, Performance Tuning Parts, Car Tuning Styling, Cars, Parts Vehicles (end time 22-Nov-08 14:00:00 GMT)

A fully decated 2 ½” bore system is adequate up to 350 bhp. After this a 3” system is recommended. Sports cat systems are available but ultimately still limit power compared to a fully decated setup

The above was taken from AndyF's website so I guess a 2.5 will do
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #12  
Monky's Avatar
Monky
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Default

Agreed, fitted a 3 inch full turbo back system to a classic Ver3 stock Sti (96) and noticed increased lag and lower engine response, go for 2.5 under 350 fly
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 01:27 PM
  #13  
samcowrx's Avatar
samcowrx
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,281
Likes: 0
From: Oxford- the shire
Default

i think if you want to actually get near 350 on a vf35 you would be wise to fit a 3" straight thru.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 01:42 PM
  #14  
dannytwo's Avatar
dannytwo
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 1,729
Likes: 0
From: where ever i lay my hat
Default

What about the 3.5" im running an APS straight through.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 03:30 PM
  #15  
maydew's Avatar
maydew
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,316
Likes: 0
From: midlands
Default

i am running a andy f 20g on a 2.5" exhaust only way to be 100% sure on the gains/loses of each would be to do a bk to bk test on the same car same rollers,i do agree it all depends on the system fitted. its all down to future planning and if you are intending to push the car over the 400+ mark in the near future, but as to my personal choice below 390-400 i would go 2.5" (maybe with 3" down pipe only if mods require)anythin above 3"
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 03:39 PM
  #16  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Originally Posted by Monky
Agreed, fitted a 3 inch full turbo back system to a classic Ver3 stock Sti (96) and noticed increased lag and lower engine response, go for 2.5 under 350 fly
That's interesting, and somewhat surprising. Did you have it remapped for the bigger exhaust as I would have expected the turbo to spool up quicker with less restriction after the turbine?
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 03:58 PM
  #17  
RJM25R's Avatar
RJM25R
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,428
Likes: 0
From: Oldham
Default

Originally Posted by weeebell
Will a 2.5" system be ok to use with a vf35 on my 01 WRX?

I've had a look at some downpipes and all I can find are 3" downpipes with the 2.5" ends on the that connect to the standard system. But I have also found a 2.5" stainless system that will fit the rest of my car.

Will this be ok for around 340-350bhp (as I think that'll be the max I can get out the vf35)

Or has anyone ever bought one of these
SUBARU IMPREZA NEW AGE STAINLESS STEEL EXHAUST SYSTEM on eBay, also Exhaust Components, Performance Tuning Parts, Car Tuning Styling, Cars, Parts Vehicles (end time 22-Nov-08 14:00:00 GMT)
Ive got that system on my Classic, and it's good quality for the price. If you've got £500+ to spend on a zorst, you wouldn't even be looking....
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 06:08 PM
  #18  
Granby's Avatar
Granby
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 5,387
Likes: 0
From: S E London........ 555 Wagon Sqn
Default

I was told by 2 difference tuners that a 2.5" system would not be a major restriction unless you were going over 500bhp which surprised me a bit
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 06:49 PM
  #19  
scooby-93's Avatar
scooby-93
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
From: scooby land
Default

i had this debate as well about a 2.5" or a 3" for my blob eye sti. i am after 330-340bhp and was told 2.5" is more than adequate up to 350bhp. and my turbo which is a vf35 is only capable of up to 350bhp so i thought i might aswell stick to 2.5" then the thought acured to me that if i did want more power in the future i would upgrade the turbo to a larger unit with supporting mods to around 400bhp but the 2.5" would not support that power so i finnaly got a 3" turbo back milltek system. expensive but i needed to have a sports cat come m.o.t time. so i would say if you arent going to go abouve 350bhp in the future stick to a 2.5" system. try getting a 2nd hand prodrive system they sound awsume much better than the milltek i have fitted now.
hope this helped
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 07:01 PM
  #20  
weeebell's Avatar
weeebell
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire
Default

Originally Posted by scooby-93
i had this debate as well about a 2.5" or a 3" for my blob eye sti. i am after 330-340bhp and was told 2.5" is more than adequate up to 350bhp. and my turbo which is a vf35 is only capable of up to 350bhp so i thought i might aswell stick to 2.5" then the thought acured to me that if i did want more power in the future i would upgrade the turbo to a larger unit with supporting mods to around 400bhp but the 2.5" would not support that power so i finnaly got a 3" turbo back milltek system. expensive but i needed to have a sports cat come m.o.t time. so i would say if you arent going to go abouve 350bhp in the future stick to a 2.5" system. try getting a 2nd hand prodrive system they sound awsume much better than the milltek i have fitted now.
hope this helped

350 will be more than enough till I see how the car copes. Its been standard all its life.
I think I'll stick to the 2.5". As for turbo's it'll either be a td05 or something from the VF series and a set of 550's
It just feels gutless as the minute, with what power it has running out at 5000rpm. I had a VF28 on my classic and it pulled all the way to the redline.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 07:39 PM
  #21  
IainMilford's Avatar
IainMilford
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 91
From: In the garage
Default

I'm running a vf35, sti pink injectors, 2.5 exhaust system with a prodrive sport cat and am mapped to 344/343
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 09:09 PM
  #22  
weeebell's Avatar
weeebell
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire
Default

Originally Posted by IainMilford
I'm running a vf35, sti pink injectors, 2.5 exhaust system with a prodrive sport cat and am mapped to 344/343

That would do lovely!! What sort of mileage does your car have?

I'm more than 90% sure thats the route I'm taking.
VF35
550's
3" downpipe
2.5" system


340bhp is amicable for our roads. I'll need brembo's and suspension after that.


Thanks for all the input.
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 09:22 PM
  #23  
IainMilford's Avatar
IainMilford
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 91
From: In the garage
Default

32000, current daily runner but will change that soon with a cheap diesel, scoob will live in the garage then and come out to play at weekends

I'm going down the handling route next
Reply
Old Nov 16, 2008 | 09:28 PM
  #24  
weeebell's Avatar
weeebell
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 696
Likes: 0
From: Ayrshire
Default

Originally Posted by IainMilford
32000, current daily runner but will change that soon with a cheap diesel, scoob will live in the garage then and come out to play at weekends

I'm going down the handling route next
Does it make power to the redline? Thats the reason why I want to change the turbo. I like using the revs and my mates WRX has the td04 on it, remapped to 280/300 but it pulls like a diesel. 1bar at 2000 and full boost at 2500 to 5000.
My vf28 was still making power at 6000 on my classic!!
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 02:44 AM
  #25  
Power Junkie's Avatar
Power Junkie
Scooby Regular
20 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,585
Likes: 6
From: Aberdeen
Default

I just went from a 2.5" system to a 3" with a 321H
With the H&S 2.5" I was about 398bhp
Just the change to 3" Revolution system and a remap to suit
Aprox 420bhp now.
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 08:50 AM
  #26  
IainMilford's Avatar
IainMilford
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,927
Likes: 91
From: In the garage
Default

^^^ backs up earlier posts about running a 3" exhaust circa 400bhp, thats quite a difference though!!

Weeebell yes, pulls all the way like a train
Reply
Old Nov 17, 2008 | 11:29 AM
  #27  
sy.'s Avatar
sy.
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
From: west mids
Default

here are my cousins figures for my99 with vf35
on 2.5" h&s(3"downpipe) 322bhp
on 3" full mongoose 328bhp
both with ome headers/up-pipe
only 6bhp so not a lot in it around 320-330 but both runs were on the same dyno so little improvement
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tarling
Subaru Parts
10
Oct 19, 2015 07:58 PM
crazyspeedfreakz
Wanted
17
Oct 5, 2015 07:19 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
Phil3822
ScoobyNet General
33
Oct 2, 2015 03:22 AM
sedge69
Wanted
0
Oct 1, 2015 09:44 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:11 AM.