Notices

3 bar map sensor + 3 port boost solenoid?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 16 October 2008, 10:28 PM
  #1  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 3 bar map sensor + 3 port boost solenoid?

whats a 3 bar map sensor and the benefits of it?

also is a 3 port boost solenoid essential for boost control?
Old 16 October 2008, 10:43 PM
  #2  
STI_Baly
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
STI_Baly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: My Workshop, Kent
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well i'll give it a go.....i believe the 3 bar allows you to run more boost basically. thinking again now, its something to do with the voltage maxing out on the standard therefore the larger 3 bar is brought in to run more than stock boost.

The 3 port solenoid is a better solenoid basically, allows you to run more controlled boost. Although i have yet to hear of anyone say the 2 port is not up to the job, depending on your boost goals obviously.

Sure the pros will give you the tech on it all if needed.

But i do know that in order to make the most of the map sensor you will possibly have to go for a remap. I run a 2.5 Marrelli type map sensor.

Good Luck
Old 16 October 2008, 10:44 PM
  #3  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wrighty338
whats a 3 bar map sensor and the benefits of it?
If you were to replace you existing OEM MAP sensor with it, then it allows the ECU to 'see' 3bar (44psi) of pressure in the boost control system... so you can run anything fom 0 (lol) to 3bar (not a good idea lol) worth of boost pressure before a fuel cut, should your engine/mods/map allow/be suitable for.

Last edited by joz8968; 16 October 2008 at 10:50 PM.
Old 17 October 2008, 12:07 AM
  #4  
bluenose172
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
bluenose172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Spec C - 12.5 @ 110(340/350)
Posts: 2,314
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The 3-Port allows for finer boost control and gives you a wee bit more headroom with your WGDC's.
Old 17 October 2008, 08:47 AM
  #5  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
If you were to replace you existing OEM MAP sensor with it, then it allows the ECU to 'see' 3bar (44psi) of pressure in the boost control system... so you can run anything fom 0 (lol) to 3bar (not a good idea lol) worth of boost pressure before a fuel cut, should your engine/mods/map allow/be suitable for.
A 3 bar map sensor wil not allow it to see 44psi of boost , that would be a 4 bar as a map sensor needs to read below atmospheric too...
1 bar down 2 up = 3 bar..
Old 17 October 2008, 10:49 AM
  #6  
Daveysaff
Scooby Newbie
 
Daveysaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As said, a 3 bar will see 29/29 psi.

Do std big turbo escort cossie map sensors work btw? they're marelli 2.5 bar.
Old 17 October 2008, 11:18 AM
  #7  
172sport
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
172sport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Nr Grimsby
Posts: 2,641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As above, you need to remember we are already at 1 atmosphere.

3bar will be ok up to a ballpark 2bar boost
Old 17 October 2008, 12:46 PM
  #8  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by MartynJ
A 3 bar map sensor wil not allow it to see 44psi of boost , that would be a 4 bar as a map sensor needs to read below atmospheric too...
1 bar down 2 up = 3 bar..
Ah, terribly sorry Martyn... (I must not dish out out 'advice' that I'm not totally sure of )

So MAP sensors are rated at 'absolute pressure', not 'relative pressure', right? So, as has been said, and in this case, it is already taking into account the 14.57psi (1bar) natural ambient air pressure, before 'adding' it's own 29.14psi (2bar) allowance 'on top'... so to speak?

Last edited by joz8968; 17 October 2008 at 12:51 PM.
Old 17 October 2008, 02:54 PM
  #9  
Shaun
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
 
Shaun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: 5 beats 4 - RS3 Rulez!!!
Posts: 8,617
Received 22 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

That is why is is called a MAP sensor.... Manifold Absolute Pressure.

Of course we could get really technical and explain that a single atmosphere is not always 1bar, as it depends on the atmospheric conditions. Get up Mount Everest and measure the atmosphere at the top of that. Yeah... best not go there!

Wrighty338,
Using a MAP sensor instead of the traditional MAF sensor is a very different principal. They would require a different ECU (in most cases). Simplistically, a MAP based system can get over some of the "issues" around the frailtys and limits of a MAF based system. This can range from dodgy MAF sensors fubaring and limits on scalability for certain power levels etc.

A 3 port boost solenoid controls the pressure to the actuator, which determines how your boost is controlled. A 2 port solenoid has an input and output (pass through). A 3 port solenoid has an extra port, to enable pressure to bleed off when required. In theory this should provide better, faster boost control.
Old 17 October 2008, 03:01 PM
  #10  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Shaun
That is why is is called a MAP sensor.... Manifold Absolute Pressure.
Doh, of course... of course
Old 17 October 2008, 05:55 PM
  #11  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

sooo, could i get rid of my maf running an apexi pfc or not. i think mines the L -jetro

would you advise a map sensor or can i not run one with a maf?

where can i get a 3 port?
Old 17 October 2008, 07:56 PM
  #12  
wrighty338
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (33)
 
wrighty338's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: E Yorks
Posts: 4,791
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

maf shouldnt be restrictive under 400bhp though im sure...
Old 17 October 2008, 08:07 PM
  #13  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Question

If you have only got the L-Jetro version of PFC, is there any way it can be made to read from the MAP instead of MAF?

I've heard murmerings of something called Mafsim? What is this? How does it work, etc, etc?

EDIT: Ha. It looks like SN has finally sorted it's clock out - it has been put back one hour for the correct time - hence this post ending up BEFORE Matyn's below. Had anyone else noticed that their posts had been exactly an hour 'late' lol?

Last edited by joz8968; 17 October 2008 at 08:10 PM.
Old 17 October 2008, 08:51 PM
  #14  
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
MartynJ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Posts: 2,629
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Not on the L-Jetro to the best of my knowledge , the D-Jetro is MAP based..
Old 17 October 2008, 10:16 PM
  #15  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

there is no D Jetro for the Subaru..

there is/was a way to convert the Ljet to use map call the mafsim but not really available anymore..

can you explain what you are trying to achieve?

if you want/need to go map based then you need a different ecu.

the 3port boost solenoid controls the boost more effectively than the standard 2port setup.

the PowerFC has the option of the boost control kit which comes with a 3bar map sensor.. but the boost contorl for running that high boost is not as nice / good as an electronic boost controller like the Apexi AVC-R for example so if you are running a setup that will take that higher levelr of boost then you would do best to go for that..

The standard 97 on map sensor is a 2.5bar..

Simon
Old 18 October 2008, 01:49 AM
  #16  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
there is no D Jetro for the Subaru..

there is/was a way to convert the Ljet to use map call the mafsim but not really available anymore..

can you explain what you are trying to achieve?
I was just wondering if the PFC was capable of running MAFless with mafsim? What DID mafsim do? Presumably it emulated the MAF's air density measurement/voltage WITHOUT actually using a MAF, no? If so, what actually was it - some piece of electronic hardware or something? I'm confused?


Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
...The standard 97 on map sensor is a 2.5bar...
Is that 2.5bar absolute... therefore 1.5bar relative?

Last edited by joz8968; 18 October 2008 at 10:07 AM.
Old 18 October 2008, 07:22 AM
  #17  
STI_Baly
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (23)
 
STI_Baly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: My Workshop, Kent
Posts: 2,588
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Daveysaff
As said, a 3 bar will see 29/29 psi.

Do std big turbo escort cossie map sensors work btw? they're marelli 2.5 bar.
They sure do, I have one fitted
Old 18 October 2008, 08:19 AM
  #18  
Daveysaff
Scooby Newbie
 
Daveysaff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That'll be handy when I buy an Impreza then, i've got 3 in the garage!!
Old 18 October 2008, 09:34 AM
  #19  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by joz8968
I was just wondering if the PFC was capable of running MAFless with mafsim? What DID mafsim do? Presumably it emulated the MAF's air density measurement/voltage WITHOUT actually using a MAF, no? If so, what actually was it - some piece of electonic hardware or something? I'm confused?




Is that 2.5bar absolute... therefore 1.5bar relative?
Yes and Yes

but the 97 on map sensor doesn't work very well with earlier than 97 powerfc
Old 18 October 2008, 10:00 AM
  #20  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
Originally Posted by joz8968
Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
there is no D Jetro for the Subaru..

there is/was a way to convert the Ljet to use map call the mafsim but not really available anymore..

can you explain what you are trying to achieve?
I was just wondering if the PFC was capable of running MAFless with mafsim? What DID mafsim do? Presumably it emulated the MAF's air density measurement/voltage WITHOUT actually using a MAF, no? If so, what actually was it - some piece of electronic hardware or something? I'm confused?
Yes
This Mafsim sounds good! How come it's not available anymore?! Or is it just elusive i.e. could I actually get hold of it if I really tried lol? How much would it cost? Where would I get it? What does it look like, etc?


Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
the 97 on map sensor doesn't work very well with earlier than 97 powerfc
Would a Bosch or Denso aftermarket one work better? Or the Cossie one as mentioned above?... It's okay though, as I've got the Boost Control Kit waiting to be fitted at a later date, anyway.

Last edited by joz8968; 18 October 2008 at 10:12 AM.
Old 18 October 2008, 10:10 AM
  #21  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the maf sim is no longer an option..

no use the apexi boost control kit map sensor or a boost controller..
you can't rescale the map sensor on the apexi so you are stuck with standard or apexi's own..

Simon
Old 18 October 2008, 10:18 AM
  #22  
joz8968
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
joz8968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Leicester
Posts: 23,761
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 6 Posts
Question

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
the maf sim is no longer an option..
That's a real shame, though


Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
no use the apexi boost control kit map sensor or a boost controller..
you can't rescale the map sensor on the apexi so you are stuck with standard or apexi's own..

Simon
Yes, I'll use the PFC BCK ... FTR, what's its MAP rated at - 3bar absolute (2bar relative)?


Thanks Simon - as always, a mine of knowledge all things Subaru
Old 18 October 2008, 07:05 PM
  #23  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

it is a 3bar sensor yes..
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Scott@ScoobySpares
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
61
11 January 2021 03:08 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
33
29 August 2017 07:18 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
38
17 July 2016 10:43 PM
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
20
22 October 2015 06:12 AM



Quick Reply: 3 bar map sensor + 3 port boost solenoid?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:11 PM.