TORQUE & BHP?
#4
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
It's different aspects of the same thing, really.
Power (bhp) measures the actual "work" an engine can produce.
Torque is a measurement of a twisting force. The torque combined with the rotational speed gives the power, so they're really both interconnected.
It's power available that can be used to accellerate the car, not torque. However, with higher torque at a given RPM, you'll have more power (bhp) available at that RPM, which is why it's nice to drive a torquey engine
Power (bhp) measures the actual "work" an engine can produce.
Torque is a measurement of a twisting force. The torque combined with the rotational speed gives the power, so they're really both interconnected.
It's power available that can be used to accellerate the car, not torque. However, with higher torque at a given RPM, you'll have more power (bhp) available at that RPM, which is why it's nice to drive a torquey engine
#6
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
The torque hasn't really got anything to do with how much the motor can pull (apart from the fact that it affects the bhp).
For example, a motorbike which makes say 100bhp at 9000 RPM would exert the same pulling power as a tractor making 100bhp at 500 RPM if both engines were run at those particular RPMs.
#7
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ex 2006 Forester STI in Black, Surrey
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Interesting fact: power (bhp) & torque curves always intersect at 5252 rpm.
Any given car, in any given gear, will accelerate at a rate that *exactly* matches its torque curve (allowing for increased air and rolling resistance as speeds climb). Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it. Torque is the only thing that a driver feels, and horsepower is just sort of an esoteric measurement in that context. 300 foot pounds of torque will accelerate you just as hard at 2000 rpm as it would if you were making that torque at 4000 rpm in the same gear, yet, per the formula, the horsepower would be *double* at 4000 rpm. Therefore, horsepower isn't particularly meaningful from a driver's perspective, and the two numbers only get friendly at 5252 rpm, where horsepower and torque always come out the same.
In contrast to a torque curve (and the matching pushback into your seat), horsepower rises rapidly with rpm, especially when torque values are also climbing. Horsepower will continue to climb, however, until well past the torque peak, and will continue to rise as engine speed climbs, until the torque curve really begins to plummet, faster than engine rpm is rising.
Any given car, in any given gear, will accelerate at a rate that *exactly* matches its torque curve (allowing for increased air and rolling resistance as speeds climb). Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it. Torque is the only thing that a driver feels, and horsepower is just sort of an esoteric measurement in that context. 300 foot pounds of torque will accelerate you just as hard at 2000 rpm as it would if you were making that torque at 4000 rpm in the same gear, yet, per the formula, the horsepower would be *double* at 4000 rpm. Therefore, horsepower isn't particularly meaningful from a driver's perspective, and the two numbers only get friendly at 5252 rpm, where horsepower and torque always come out the same.
In contrast to a torque curve (and the matching pushback into your seat), horsepower rises rapidly with rpm, especially when torque values are also climbing. Horsepower will continue to climb, however, until well past the torque peak, and will continue to rise as engine speed climbs, until the torque curve really begins to plummet, faster than engine rpm is rising.
Trending Topics
#10
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Interesting fact: power (bhp) & torque curves always intersect at 5252 rpm.
Any given car, in any given gear, will accelerate at a rate that *exactly* matches its torque curve (allowing for increased air and rolling resistance as speeds climb). Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it. Torque is the only thing that a driver feels, and horsepower is just sort of an esoteric measurement in that context. 300 foot pounds of torque will accelerate you just as hard at 2000 rpm as it would if you were making that torque at 4000 rpm in the same gear, yet, per the formula, the horsepower would be *double* at 4000 rpm. Therefore, horsepower isn't particularly meaningful from a driver's perspective, and the two numbers only get friendly at 5252 rpm, where horsepower and torque always come out the same.
In contrast to a torque curve (and the matching pushback into your seat), horsepower rises rapidly with rpm, especially when torque values are also climbing. Horsepower will continue to climb, however, until well past the torque peak, and will continue to rise as engine speed climbs, until the torque curve really begins to plummet, faster than engine rpm is rising.
Any given car, in any given gear, will accelerate at a rate that *exactly* matches its torque curve (allowing for increased air and rolling resistance as speeds climb). Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it. Torque is the only thing that a driver feels, and horsepower is just sort of an esoteric measurement in that context. 300 foot pounds of torque will accelerate you just as hard at 2000 rpm as it would if you were making that torque at 4000 rpm in the same gear, yet, per the formula, the horsepower would be *double* at 4000 rpm. Therefore, horsepower isn't particularly meaningful from a driver's perspective, and the two numbers only get friendly at 5252 rpm, where horsepower and torque always come out the same.
In contrast to a torque curve (and the matching pushback into your seat), horsepower rises rapidly with rpm, especially when torque values are also climbing. Horsepower will continue to climb, however, until well past the torque peak, and will continue to rise as engine speed climbs, until the torque curve really begins to plummet, faster than engine rpm is rising.
#12
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ex 2006 Forester STI in Black, Surrey
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What you are failing to consider is the effect of "gearing" and "power to weight ratios".
#15
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ex 2006 Forester STI in Black, Surrey
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I forget what the maximum allowed engine capacity of an F1 car is these days (2.5l..?), but the best way to get 200+mph combined with extreme acceleration is to design the engines to rev high (18,000 rpm). Every car engine designer would be doing this if if we were all prepared to buy £500k cars !!
Diesel engines are not as good for high revving situations.
#16
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ex 2006 Forester STI in Black, Surrey
Posts: 590
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ps. a "normal" tractor will make about 100bhp @ a low peak of 2,000 revs. This is the gearing effect I mentioned earlier, and is why most tractors don't (can't) go over 25mph on roads.
#17
Scooby Regular
Interesting fact: power (bhp) & torque curves always intersect at 5252 rpm.
Any given car, in any given gear, will accelerate at a rate that *exactly* matches its torque curve (allowing for increased air and rolling resistance as speeds climb). Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it. Torque is the only thing that a driver feels, and horsepower is just sort of an esoteric measurement in that context. 300 foot pounds of torque will accelerate you just as hard at 2000 rpm as it would if you were making that torque at 4000 rpm in the same gear, yet, per the formula, the horsepower would be *double* at 4000 rpm. Therefore, horsepower isn't particularly meaningful from a driver's perspective, and the two numbers only get friendly at 5252 rpm, where horsepower and torque always come out the same.
In contrast to a torque curve (and the matching pushback into your seat), horsepower rises rapidly with rpm, especially when torque values are also climbing. Horsepower will continue to climb, however, until well past the torque peak, and will continue to rise as engine speed climbs, until the torque curve really begins to plummet, faster than engine rpm is rising.
Any given car, in any given gear, will accelerate at a rate that *exactly* matches its torque curve (allowing for increased air and rolling resistance as speeds climb). Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it. Torque is the only thing that a driver feels, and horsepower is just sort of an esoteric measurement in that context. 300 foot pounds of torque will accelerate you just as hard at 2000 rpm as it would if you were making that torque at 4000 rpm in the same gear, yet, per the formula, the horsepower would be *double* at 4000 rpm. Therefore, horsepower isn't particularly meaningful from a driver's perspective, and the two numbers only get friendly at 5252 rpm, where horsepower and torque always come out the same.
In contrast to a torque curve (and the matching pushback into your seat), horsepower rises rapidly with rpm, especially when torque values are also climbing. Horsepower will continue to climb, however, until well past the torque peak, and will continue to rise as engine speed climbs, until the torque curve really begins to plummet, faster than engine rpm is rising.
" Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it."
Thats simply false. The car will accelerate at its greatest rate in any given gear when bhp is at its highest - not torque. In terms of physics you need energy to accelerate anything. Energy is power x time. BHP is a measure of power and hence if you know the energy needed to get a car to 100mph then the higher the bhp (or KW if you prefer metric) the lower the time taken to generate the energy required.
Torque is a component of bhp, so it does have a role in the equation, but an engine producing 1lbft at 1000000000rpm will have 190403bhp and an engine producing 100000lbft at 1rpm would have 19bhp. ie the high torque engine will have very poor aceleration relative to the low torque engine.
Last edited by borat52; 16 May 2008 at 05:02 PM.
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Where did that come from? Its incorrect.
" Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it."
Thats simply false. The car will accelerate at its greatest rate in any given gear when bhp is at its highest - not torque. In terms of physics you need energy to accelerate anything. Energy is power x time. BHP is a measure of power and hence if you know the energy needed to get a car to 100mph then the higher the bhp (or KW if you prefer metric) the lower the time taken to generate the energy required.
Torque is a component of bhp, so it does have a role in the equation, but an engine producing 1lbft at 1000000000rpm will have 190403bhp then an engine producing 100000lbft at 1rpm, and hence would have 19bhp. ie the high torque engine will not have very poor aceleration relative to the low torque engine.
" Another way of saying this is that a car will accelerate hardest at its torque peak in any given gear, and will not accelerate as hard below that peak, or above it."
Thats simply false. The car will accelerate at its greatest rate in any given gear when bhp is at its highest - not torque. In terms of physics you need energy to accelerate anything. Energy is power x time. BHP is a measure of power and hence if you know the energy needed to get a car to 100mph then the higher the bhp (or KW if you prefer metric) the lower the time taken to generate the energy required.
Torque is a component of bhp, so it does have a role in the equation, but an engine producing 1lbft at 1000000000rpm will have 190403bhp then an engine producing 100000lbft at 1rpm, and hence would have 19bhp. ie the high torque engine will not have very poor aceleration relative to the low torque engine.
W=mv^2 / 2, and W=P*t,
thus P*t = mv^2/2, or t = (mv^2)/(2P). Thus, to accellerate to a certain v as fast as possible, P has to be as high as possible.
#20
some good articles here Puma Racing Main Menu Page - flow development, engine building, technical and tuning articles
Power and Torque 1- How they are related and the maths that explain them
Power and Torque 2 - Output levels for road and race engines, Volumetric Efficiency and improving engine design
Power and Torque 3 - How they are measured, engine dynamometers and rolling road dynos
Power and Torque 1- How they are related and the maths that explain them
Power and Torque 2 - Output levels for road and race engines, Volumetric Efficiency and improving engine design
Power and Torque 3 - How they are measured, engine dynamometers and rolling road dynos
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Up A Creek Without A Paddle
Posts: 313
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#25
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: North West
Posts: 236
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
High torque is important, but it depends where in the rev range you have it.
A lot of typically remapped td04 scoobs have 280 lb/ft of torque - but only at approx 3500 rpm. By 6000 rpm it will be much less, probably down to around 200 lb/ft - hence the power drops down as revs rise.
To keep the torque at 280 lb/ft all the way up the rpm range would require constantly increasing boost pressures. probably over 25 psi by 7000 rpm.
But if you could keep 280 lbft at 7000 rpm then you have a very HIGH BHP car.
low torque honda engines rev very high to compensate.
High torque at high rpm is what really counts.
A lot of typically remapped td04 scoobs have 280 lb/ft of torque - but only at approx 3500 rpm. By 6000 rpm it will be much less, probably down to around 200 lb/ft - hence the power drops down as revs rise.
To keep the torque at 280 lb/ft all the way up the rpm range would require constantly increasing boost pressures. probably over 25 psi by 7000 rpm.
But if you could keep 280 lbft at 7000 rpm then you have a very HIGH BHP car.
low torque honda engines rev very high to compensate.
High torque at high rpm is what really counts.
#27
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 1,615
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
always go for more torque IMO.
Mine and a friends car are both at 320bhp....mine is 300lbs torque his is 360lbs (2.5ltr bottom end)....lets just say theres a vast difference when we have some fun.....ooooh if only I could afford a bottom end...
#28
some good articles here Puma Racing Main Menu Page - flow development, engine building, technical and tuning articles
Power and Torque 1- How they are related and the maths that explain them
Power and Torque 2 - Output levels for road and race engines, Volumetric Efficiency and improving engine design
Power and Torque 3 - How they are measured, engine dynamometers and rolling road dynos
Power and Torque 1- How they are related and the maths that explain them
Power and Torque 2 - Output levels for road and race engines, Volumetric Efficiency and improving engine design
Power and Torque 3 - How they are measured, engine dynamometers and rolling road dynos
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post