Safe power on standard internals
#1
Safe power on standard internals
Ok I know the gearbox is the weak link when you start getting high 200s low 300bhp / ftlb figures.
But what's the weak link in the engine and what are the 'safe' running perameters on a standard UK engine ?
Is it a out and out power / torque factor, or rpm than kills the engine ?
I understand regular oil changes and sympathetic ownership goes a long way towards it, but what would break if you bolt on stuff for big figures ?
But what's the weak link in the engine and what are the 'safe' running perameters on a standard UK engine ?
Is it a out and out power / torque factor, or rpm than kills the engine ?
I understand regular oil changes and sympathetic ownership goes a long way towards it, but what would break if you bolt on stuff for big figures ?
#5
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
I ran a 95 WRX Wagon for around 25K miles between 385 and 410 bhp/350-360 ft lbs The variation in power output was due to different fuels, the bottom figures being Optimax plus 2ml/litre NF and the top figures being a brew with methanol/toluene.
Everything was in good working order when stripped.
The same engine, ie block and crank, with different pistons,(not rebored) rods and heads but the same Sigma ECU and one of my own TD05-06 20Gs, now does 422 bhp on V-Power plus 2mls/litre NF.
STi pistons will be more tolerant than WRX or UK on an O/E engine.
So to answer your question, it will depend on how the car is driven and how the engine is treated but standard engine seem to be quite reliable up to around 400 bhp if treated sensibly.
Everything was in good working order when stripped.
The same engine, ie block and crank, with different pistons,(not rebored) rods and heads but the same Sigma ECU and one of my own TD05-06 20Gs, now does 422 bhp on V-Power plus 2mls/litre NF.
STi pistons will be more tolerant than WRX or UK on an O/E engine.
So to answer your question, it will depend on how the car is driven and how the engine is treated but standard engine seem to be quite reliable up to around 400 bhp if treated sensibly.
Trending Topics
#8
#9
Subaru Tuning Specialist
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 7.74 @179 mph 1/4 mile - road legal
Posts: 6,654
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
My previous 2003 'Project WRX' has been running just on 400bhp/365 torque on std internals for over a year now. The car, in its new owners hands, is severely thrashed at Crail 1/4 mile track approx 10-12 times every 2nd weekend
It has ran a best time of 12.11 and is rarely slower than 12.5, not bad for a full weight new age car !
I only mention the 1/4 mile times as there are a few suspect power results out there that don't translate into a quick car on the road.
Andy
It has ran a best time of 12.11 and is rarely slower than 12.5, not bad for a full weight new age car !
I only mention the 1/4 mile times as there are a few suspect power results out there that don't translate into a quick car on the road.
Andy
#11
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Behind the wheel of a Time Attack R33 GTR
Posts: 5,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
id say neither....just the mapping
Ive snapped a rod, but it took Nitrous to do it...the pistons as far as im aware were fine when they came out..
Ive snapped a rod, but it took Nitrous to do it...the pistons as far as im aware were fine when they came out..
#14
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Barnsley
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
So would you push on upto 400bhp and wait for it to possibly break, or fit better pistons and rods so it has less chance of breaking?
67k engine running VF29 and supporting mods.
Damo
67k engine running VF29 and supporting mods.
Damo
#17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
My previous 2003 'Project WRX' has been running just on 400bhp/365 torque on std internals for over a year now. The car, in its new owners hands, is severely thrashed at Crail 1/4 mile track approx 10-12 times every 2nd weekend
It has ran a best time of 12.11 and is rarely slower than 12.5, not bad for a full weight new age car !
I only mention the 1/4 mile times as there are a few suspect power results out there that don't translate into a quick car on the road.
Andy
It has ran a best time of 12.11 and is rarely slower than 12.5, not bad for a full weight new age car !
I only mention the 1/4 mile times as there are a few suspect power results out there that don't translate into a quick car on the road.
Andy
#19
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Worcester
Posts: 2,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
mines being running over a year with 386bhp @ the clinic
about 1.45 bar on a rcm gt35 p18 running on esso super
have seen figures over 400 on another roller
the car is a weekend toy and does get a roasting most weekends
im now in the process of upgrading as im fed up of constantly waiting for it to blow - I have always been sensible but it does start to play on your mind after a bit
i wouldn't personally do it again unless i was building a new engine on the side and didn't mind to much if this one popped
the power band is small and a 8k rev limmit would be a huge bonus, the car is a different animal to the vf35 p18 i had previous but probably not a huge difference on road X from A to B time wise due to that extra bit of lag
as Neil said i think its down to a good mapper along with a bit of sensible driving
if i get chance i will post some pics up of the ring lands when my block is cracked open this year
about 1.45 bar on a rcm gt35 p18 running on esso super
have seen figures over 400 on another roller
the car is a weekend toy and does get a roasting most weekends
im now in the process of upgrading as im fed up of constantly waiting for it to blow - I have always been sensible but it does start to play on your mind after a bit
i wouldn't personally do it again unless i was building a new engine on the side and didn't mind to much if this one popped
the power band is small and a 8k rev limmit would be a huge bonus, the car is a different animal to the vf35 p18 i had previous but probably not a huge difference on road X from A to B time wise due to that extra bit of lag
as Neil said i think its down to a good mapper along with a bit of sensible driving
if i get chance i will post some pics up of the ring lands when my block is cracked open this year
#20
I'm running a TD05 18G with Methanol maped by Bob Rawle on my bugeye with standard internals..probably around the 400 / 360 mark but not been on a dyno yet.
Daily driver plus the odd blast Had to change the clutch because of it slipping but nothing else broken yet
Shaun
Daily driver plus the odd blast Had to change the clutch because of it slipping but nothing else broken yet
Shaun
#21
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (48)
An STi engine is preferable to a WRX, better pistons but if you are going to open up a WRX engine to upgrade I would not bother with STi bits. For a strong engine with proven quality pistons, I use Omega and steel rods : Arrow.
If you are not exceeding 400 bhp on a 2 litre I would be sensible as to how the engine was treated and expect to get reasonable life from it.
If you are not exceeding 400 bhp on a 2 litre I would be sensible as to how the engine was treated and expect to get reasonable life from it.
#22
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kempston Bedford
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
An STi engine is preferable to a WRX, better pistons but if you are going to open up a WRX engine to upgrade I would not bother with STi bits. For a strong engine with proven quality pistons, I use Omega and steel rods : Arrow.
If you are not exceeding 400 bhp on a 2 litre I would be sensible as to how the engine was treated and expect to get reasonable life from it.
If you are not exceeding 400 bhp on a 2 litre I would be sensible as to how the engine was treated and expect to get reasonable life from it.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shorty87
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
19
22 December 2015 11:59 AM
MightyArsenal
Wheels, Tyres & Brakes
6
25 September 2015 08:31 PM