Notices
General Technical
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: CARiD

are these compression readings goo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 03:03 PM
  #1  
VAL113R's Avatar
VAL113R
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Default are these compression readings goo?

I was getting new plugs fitted to my 93 wrx. I decided to get a compression test done at the same time.

The readings on all cylinders was 125

The car has done 93k miles. Is this good or bad?
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 04:02 PM
  #2  
34srm's Avatar
34srm
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 871
Likes: 0
Default

would have thought it would be more like 170+
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 04:48 PM
  #3  
Slowboy Racing's Avatar
Slowboy Racing
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Default

Yes the readings are a little on the low side, was the motor upto temp ?

info for pre 97

981 - 1177kPa
10.0 - 12.0kg/cm2
142 - 171psi

Limit
834kPa
8.5kg/cm2
121psi

Max difference between cylinders
196kPA
2.0kg/cm2
28psi
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 10:33 PM
  #4  
VAL113R's Avatar
VAL113R
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Default

I don't think it was up to temperature. The car was in the garage for 2 days. I was getting some electrical work done on it. It was definitely cold when they did the test.

The thing is the car has never missed a beat. Doing a search on here it seems a lot of people are getting the same sort of results, even though there are posts afterwards from people saying they're too low.

I would be intrigued to hear from these people to find out if their engine went bang shortly afterwards or anything?


Originally Posted by *Un-ink*
Yes the readings are a little on the low side, was the motor upto temp ?

info for pre 97

981 - 1177kPa
10.0 - 12.0kg/cm2
142 - 171psi

Limit
834kPa
8.5kg/cm2
121psi

Max difference between cylinders
196kPA
2.0kg/cm2
28psi
Reply
Old Feb 14, 2007 | 11:21 PM
  #5  
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 2
From: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Default

as long as all four are similar compression I wouldn't worry.. especially if the engine was cold.

Simon
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 12:32 AM
  #6  
silent running's Avatar
silent running
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,957
Likes: 1
From: East coast.
Default

Mine came out at 155-170 across all four cylinders, 2000 miles after a rebuild. Standard 2.0 turbo.
Reply
Old Feb 15, 2007 | 08:39 AM
  #7  
Slowboy Racing's Avatar
Slowboy Racing
Former Sponsor
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,658
Likes: 0
From: 10.68 QT mile in 2007 2.33 Type R ** Current 2002 Spec C 2.33 Track prepped.
Default

You would need to do this test when the motor is up to temp to get an accurate reading. Based on that I am sure it will be fine as the rings expand the seal will be greater giving you less leakage and as you have said they all read 125, it would be a concern if there where quite different readings between each cylinder.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
Nov 13, 2015 10:49 AM
the shreksta
General Technical
27
Oct 2, 2015 03:20 PM
Wish
Computer & Technology Related
3
Sep 30, 2015 10:39 PM
crazyspeedfreakz
ScoobyNet General
5
Sep 29, 2015 05:04 PM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 AM.