Notices

AFR advice please

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02 March 2006, 08:47 PM
  #1  
Ben v7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ben v7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default AFR advice please

I have a 2001 WRX with the usual de-cat exhaust, filter and remap. The AFR is currently 12.1 (made 286bhp on MAHA rollers). The map is being tweaked to sort out some overboost and have the option of adjusting this also.

Was recommended to me that I run an AFR of 12.5 for optimum performance but was told this is dangerously lean... and it's been suggested that I might even want to run a bit richer than the 12.1 it is at currently.

Can someone please give me some guidance on this issue?

Thanks.

Edit: correct AFR's now!

Last edited by Ben v7; 02 March 2006 at 11:06 PM.
Old 02 March 2006, 09:06 PM
  #2  
MarkFitz
Scooby Regular
 
MarkFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brentwood
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've recently checked my 97MY UK spec with a wideband and got the following AFR's @ 0.9bar....
13.2 @ 3000rpm
12.5 @ 4000rpm
11.6 @ 4500rpm
These are with std ECU, std Intake and DeCat Exh.

How are you reading AFR? Sounds like your sensors screwed since you'll only see 20+ during backouts - ie. fuel-shutoff. If your AFR is really that lean under load and you have'nt pulled all your spark out, it's bye-bye to your engine.
Old 02 March 2006, 09:40 PM
  #3  
Ben v7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ben v7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It was measured on a rolling road... was just told this by the operator... wasn't using wideband.
Old 02 March 2006, 09:50 PM
  #4  
MarkFitz
Scooby Regular
 
MarkFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brentwood
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

gotta be a mix up somewhere. If you're in Essex I could dig up my kit and do a check, would have to be weekend though.
Old 02 March 2006, 10:07 PM
  #5  
Ben v7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ben v7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Appreciate the offer mate - it's going on another set of rollers this weekend so hopefully will be able to shed some more light on things then.

Thanks
Old 02 March 2006, 10:35 PM
  #6  
alexf2003
Scooby Regular
 
alexf2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

21 is not an AFR.

you do not want to be leaner than 12:1 really.

Alex
Old 02 March 2006, 11:12 PM
  #7  
Ben v7
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
 
Ben v7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: South London
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just re-read my first post... I mean't 12.1 not 21... it's been a long day.

Your figures seem to fit now Mark.
Old 02 March 2006, 11:33 PM
  #8  
MarkFitz
Scooby Regular
 
MarkFitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Brentwood
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ok, makes sense now. running 12.5 at max power rpms might be a bit dodge, you should be well rich up at those speeds to help keep your EGT's down, etc. Probably best to play it safe when it comes to squeezing out the last few bhp at the top end.
Old 03 March 2006, 08:21 AM
  #9  
Scott.T
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Scott.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 6,181
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

12.5 or 12.1 is quite lean.

You start to lose power onece you drop into the high 10's which is where a standard ECU tends to be near the redline.

To be safe but to still achieve good power, you really nead to be mid 11's.

The 2.5's tend to run a bit leaner i.e in the low to mid 12's but alot of these are also running headers etc... which IIRC can allow you to run a bit leaner

Have you got a copy of the RR plot with AFR on it, that you can post. Saying it's '12.1' is a bit of a genralisation.

Last edited by Scott.T; 03 March 2006 at 08:24 AM.
Old 03 March 2006, 10:00 AM
  #10  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

What boost?
Old 03 March 2006, 12:26 PM
  #11  
Scott.T
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Scott.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: East Sussex
Posts: 6,181
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Jolly Green Monster
What boost?
If it hasn't been mapped (which the 1st post seemd to indicate), then I would suspect approx 1 bar (maybe slightly less)
Old 03 March 2006, 12:29 PM
  #12  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ben v7
I have a 2001 WRX with the usual de-cat exhaust, filter and remap.
!!
Old 03 March 2006, 12:31 PM
  #13  
Jolly Green Monster
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jolly Green Monster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: ECU Mapping - www.JollyGreenMonster.co.uk
Posts: 16,548
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

regardless.. 12.1 is too lean unless you are running meth?
Old 03 March 2006, 01:06 PM
  #14  
SoNiCa
Scooby Regular
 
SoNiCa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Turkiye, Florida
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'm wondering about the approximate power gains leaning from 10.2:1 AFR to lets say 11.6:1 on a stock scooby.

I'm running quite rich because I cant feel if the car is really making power at lean afrs like 11.6:1 (RR) I know I need to run it on load type dyno but just wanted to know if could notice any power gains.
Old 03 March 2006, 01:36 PM
  #15  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

10.2 is very rich, probably sapping power assuming the gauge was accurate
Old 03 March 2006, 02:00 PM
  #16  
SoNiCa
Scooby Regular
 
SoNiCa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Turkiye, Florida
Posts: 433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Peanuts, it was just an example. I'm running 10.7:1 at 7000rpm, 14 psi and the wideband(zeitronix) is located in the mid pipe.(turboback without cat)
Old 03 March 2006, 02:29 PM
  #17  
Mo
Scooby Regular
 
Mo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: the fastest rentals in town......0-100mph in 10 seconds
Posts: 1,401
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I wouldn't expect to see much difference at all in engine output leaning out to the AFR your suggesting and you really need to be monitoring knock and EGTs when testing this.
Old 03 March 2006, 02:52 PM
  #18  
David MY99
Scooby Regular
 
David MY99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 370
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Cruising around 14.0:1 - 14.7:1
0.0 Bar would be around 13.5:1
0.5 bar around 12.5:1
1.0Bar Around 11.8:1
1.5 bar 11.3:1

I think these are the numbers you should see if the car's been remapped.
Old 03 March 2006, 03:02 PM
  #19  
Peanuts
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Peanuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 8,606
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I get
15.0:1 at idle
14.7/9 at cruise
11.7 at 1.0 bar
11.3 at 1.65 bar
all based on an 18g with headers

I run methanol so will be leaning these out a bit tonight
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
just me
Non Scooby Related
26
03 January 2020 11:12 AM
Sam Witwicky
Engine Management and ECU Remapping
17
13 November 2015 10:49 AM
scoobhunter722
ScoobyNet General
52
20 October 2015 04:32 PM
Phil3822
General Technical
0
30 September 2015 06:29 PM
paddyscoob
General Technical
10
30 September 2015 03:51 PM



Quick Reply: AFR advice please



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:22 PM.