Tsl333
#3
thanks for the reply,
we are pondering over the idea of what to get, and really dont have a clue, the misses wants a evo fq300 i wanna sti, but i not going to go down that route on here on which is best, which model and spec of the sti is favoured now, have owned 2 imprezas my95, and a myoo, with ppp and ap six pots, full hks system, but sold the latter 2 years ago and have lost touch ever since of the scooby thing so dont know whats hot and whats not anymore, any advice please
we are pondering over the idea of what to get, and really dont have a clue, the misses wants a evo fq300 i wanna sti, but i not going to go down that route on here on which is best, which model and spec of the sti is favoured now, have owned 2 imprezas my95, and a myoo, with ppp and ap six pots, full hks system, but sold the latter 2 years ago and have lost touch ever since of the scooby thing so dont know whats hot and whats not anymore, any advice please
#5
EVO magazine (June 2004) did a group test of modded new age Impreza's. They concluded that the TSL333 had the best balance of performance and price out of all of the cars tested.
Cheers
Si
Cheers
Si
Trending Topics
#9
I'm sure they all probably had fuel additives and a bit of map tweaking for it. It would make sense, as they were all quite a bit quicker than the PPP.
If you add 1ml/l NF to optimax in your PPP you'll gain roughly 15 bhp/lbft ATW, as they leave some headroom for better octane fuel in the ign comp maps. At least that's been the case in my experience.
If you add 1ml/l NF to optimax in your PPP you'll gain roughly 15 bhp/lbft ATW, as they leave some headroom for better octane fuel in the ign comp maps. At least that's been the case in my experience.
#10
Scooby Regular
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lincoln
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've driven this TSL demo car and the reports are spot on, it pulls quickly and keeps going and going much more than the standard STi PPP. The mapping is excellant, TSL map more for drivability and reliabilty over all out power and a big bang a couple of months later.
Richard a recently remapped mine for a new clutch and flywheel, what a difference, endless power now.
DP
Richard a recently remapped mine for a new clutch and flywheel, what a difference, endless power now.
DP
#11
Originally Posted by SiHethers
I'm sure they all probably had fuel additives and a bit of map tweaking for it. It would make sense, as they were all quite a bit quicker than the PPP.
If you add 1ml/l NF to optimax in your PPP you'll gain roughly 15 bhp/lbft ATW, as they leave some headroom for better octane fuel in the ign comp maps. At least that's been the case in my experience.
If you add 1ml/l NF to optimax in your PPP you'll gain roughly 15 bhp/lbft ATW, as they leave some headroom for better octane fuel in the ign comp maps. At least that's been the case in my experience.
I have 03 STi PPP and would conside OB - what is your car?
#12
Originally Posted by dogpole
I've driven this TSL demo car and the reports are spot on, it pulls quickly and keeps going and going much more than the standard STi PPP. The mapping is excellant, TSL map more for drivability and reliabilty over all out power and a big bang a couple of months later.
Richard a recently remapped mine for a new clutch and flywheel, what a difference, endless power now.
DP
Richard a recently remapped mine for a new clutch and flywheel, what a difference, endless power now.
DP
#13
GRIFF
I've been using NF for 20000+ miles in my MY99. A friend has been using NF in his MY03 STI PPP for 15000+ miles. No problems with either.
There is a theoretical concern (as in no-one has proven it) that adding extra methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) based OB to optimax (which already has MMT in it) may cause damage to ignition/emission systems. This is due to you getting a manganese oxide residue deposited when using MMT on your sparkies, o2 sensor and catalyst, causing failure of all. I've never heard of a case where this has happened, and I think it is probably BS, so long as you don't overdose with it (such as using a full bottle, 5ml/l, NF per tank - this will undoubtedly **** your catalyst, with time at the least).
TSL are good so long as you only want to do what they advise and don't mention any competitors when speaking to them
Simon
I've been using NF for 20000+ miles in my MY99. A friend has been using NF in his MY03 STI PPP for 15000+ miles. No problems with either.
There is a theoretical concern (as in no-one has proven it) that adding extra methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) based OB to optimax (which already has MMT in it) may cause damage to ignition/emission systems. This is due to you getting a manganese oxide residue deposited when using MMT on your sparkies, o2 sensor and catalyst, causing failure of all. I've never heard of a case where this has happened, and I think it is probably BS, so long as you don't overdose with it (such as using a full bottle, 5ml/l, NF per tank - this will undoubtedly **** your catalyst, with time at the least).
TSL are good so long as you only want to do what they advise and don't mention any competitors when speaking to them
Simon
#14
Originally Posted by SiHethers
GRIFF
I've been using NF for 20000+ miles in my MY99. A friend has been using NF in his MY03 STI PPP for 15000+ miles. No problems with either.
There is a theoretical concern (as in no-one has proven it) that adding extra methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) based OB to optimax (which already has MMT in it) may cause damage to ignition/emission systems. This is due to you getting a manganese oxide residue deposited when using MMT on your sparkies, o2 sensor and catalyst, causing failure of all. I've never heard of a case where this has happened, and I think it is probably BS, so long as you don't overdose with it (such as using a full bottle, 5ml/l, NF per tank - this will undoubtedly **** your catalyst, with time at the least).
TSL are good so long as you only want to do what they advise and don't mention any competitors when speaking to them
Simon
I've been using NF for 20000+ miles in my MY99. A friend has been using NF in his MY03 STI PPP for 15000+ miles. No problems with either.
There is a theoretical concern (as in no-one has proven it) that adding extra methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl (MMT) based OB to optimax (which already has MMT in it) may cause damage to ignition/emission systems. This is due to you getting a manganese oxide residue deposited when using MMT on your sparkies, o2 sensor and catalyst, causing failure of all. I've never heard of a case where this has happened, and I think it is probably BS, so long as you don't overdose with it (such as using a full bottle, 5ml/l, NF per tank - this will undoubtedly **** your catalyst, with time at the least).
TSL are good so long as you only want to do what they advise and don't mention any competitors when speaking to them
Simon
Richard is due to phone me back - intend discussing fitting cool air induction kits a la Graham Goode and the like along with possbly mixed exhaust and their Ecutek remap with aim to get max torque and character
I figure if PPP is 305 bhp (mine was RRd at 310 with de-cat center + afterburner - previous owner! - now back to PPP) then full de-cat + induction kit + OB + remap has to be close to extra 40+ bhp over PPP? - yet many claim that turbo wont flow 350?! - personal goal would be broad availability of 340+ ft lb without being loud on the exhaust...
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post