Notices

Oil surge/starvation myth?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 18 January 2016, 11:39 PM
  #1  
A1AXX
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
Thread Starter
 
A1AXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Wilts
Posts: 208
Received 33 Likes on 13 Posts
Default Oil surge/starvation myth?

After searching a lot, all I have found are failures due to the oil pickups cracking or upgraded pumps etc

What is the myth with oil starvation from track use causing bottom end knock? I know oil starvation will cause bottom end knock, but when has it actually been caused by cornering and not some other issue?

My car has been on track with the previous owner, has the toucan, so imagine the oil pressure was fine at castle combe as it has the wee alarms etc

I know guys that have ran with no baffles/windage tray and later with rcm windage tray, with no bad results before or after. I can see the killer b setup is the best going, but may be only available from the US.

On track I am a spirited driver, running ad08rs, hsd coilovers, whiteline arbs etc etc. Use good 15w50 oil. Engine is a 2.1.

Is there real evidence that the mods to the pick up/ windage tray or sumps really make a difference to oil pressure drops? Or do the pressure drops even get to a dangerous level?!

Im just not one for wasting time and money where its not needed, think many can agree with that. So many different things you could do for track prep, where does the prep stop and the fun begin!!!

Last edited by A1AXX; 18 January 2016 at 11:43 PM.
Old 19 January 2016, 08:47 AM
  #2  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Without sounding too obvious, it's to do with the layout of the flat four, is the way it was explained to me, the cornering forces keep and push oil to the heads / cams so causing starvation at sump/crank level as there MAY be moments when there is very little or no oil for the pick up to suck due to it's location in the sump. This isn't going to cause immediate failure but over prolonged periods of track use will cause excessive wear on the big end shells, so shortening engine life.

I'm unsure how true this is in practice, but when you think about it it seems to make sense, ultimately it's going to vary from one engine to the next dependant on use and maintenance, but if I were planing on working my engine hard on a regular basis I'd be doing everything to ensure it has the best chance of survival in a harsh environment.
Old 19 January 2016, 09:22 AM
  #3  
A1AXX
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
Thread Starter
 
A1AXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Wilts
Posts: 208
Received 33 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Without sounding too obvious, it's to do with the layout of the flat four, is the way it was explained to me, the cornering forces keep and push oil to the heads / cams so causing starvation at sump/crank level as there MAY be moments when there is very little or no oil for the pick up to suck due to it's location in the sump. This isn't going to cause immediate failure but over prolonged periods of track use will cause excessive wear on the big end shells, so shortening engine life.

I'm unsure how true this is in practice, but when you think about it it seems to make sense, ultimately it's going to vary from one engine to the next dependant on use and maintenance, but if I were planing on working my engine hard on a regular basis I'd be doing everything to ensure it has the best chance of survival in a harsh environment.
Yea I see what you mean.. I can see why the rcm/cosworth tray can cause problems.. If anything I will try to get a hold of the killer b one. Dont want anything restricting the path to the sump you know.. I'd love to see comparisons of the different sumps.. Ej20 and 25 ones are different arent they. Ones flat and the other is smaller and deeper
Old 19 January 2016, 09:39 AM
  #4  
ditchmyster
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
ditchmyster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Living the dream
Posts: 13,624
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Spec C sump is a popular up-grade, I think they come baffled and are bigger with a slightly different shape too, but not 100% on all the details.

As for the prep thing, it's one of the many reasons some of the regular track day boys go for the the Spec C as it's built for the job out the box, with gearbox and engine oil coolers and anti surge fuel pump amongst other things, works out cheaper in the long run and the car is worth more once you've finished canning it than something like a track prepped standard STI.
Old 19 January 2016, 10:25 AM
  #5  
A1AXX
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
Thread Starter
 
A1AXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Wilts
Posts: 208
Received 33 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ditchmyster
Spec C sump is a popular up-grade, I think they come baffled and are bigger with a slightly different shape too, but not 100% on all the details.

As for the prep thing, it's one of the many reasons some of the regular track day boys go for the the Spec C as it's built for the job out the box, with gearbox and engine oil coolers and anti surge fuel pump amongst other things, works out cheaper in the long run and the car is worth more once you've finished canning it than something like a track prepped standard STI.
Ahh didnt realise they had a box cooler. Id love a spec c.. Almost spent spec c money buying the bug! Luckily as I haven't taken the hit building it, I can always break it if I wasn't going to get good money for it, about the only way I could justify it to the mrs!!
Old 19 January 2016, 10:49 AM
  #6  
wms-racing
Former Sponsor
 
wms-racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Holywell
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I always recommend a baffled sump for track use, I've been rallying an Impreza in the woods since 2004 and only ever used a std sump, never had a problem. But the forces on track are differn't. Speak to Alyn at AS Performance for a very cost effective modified std sump, as per Prodrive group N, but improved.
Old 20 January 2016, 09:07 PM
  #7  
Steve Whitehorn
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (13)
 
Steve Whitehorn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Kent
Posts: 4,036
Received 19 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

I give it death on track and I have a Prodrive Group N baffled sump for 6years now.
It has served me well and I have never had any starvation problems
Old 20 January 2016, 09:21 PM
  #8  
A1AXX
Scooby Regular
Support Scoobynet!
Thread Starter
 
A1AXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Wilts
Posts: 208
Received 33 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by wms-racing
I always recommend a baffled sump for track use, I've been rallying an Impreza in the woods since 2004 and only ever used a std sump, never had a problem. But the forces on track are differn't. Speak to Alyn at AS Performance for a very cost effective modified std sump, as per Prodrive group N, but improved.
Originally Posted by Steve Whitehorn
I give it death on track and I have a Prodrive Group N baffled sump for 6years now.
It has served me well and I have never had any starvation problems

I take it the grp n is the smooth top plate and the modified sump is smoothed to copy the prodrive one?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
CRAIG DILLON
Subaru Parts
4
04 January 2016 05:38 PM
Petey Grugan
General Technical
3
25 December 2015 05:32 PM
hamzi95
General Technical
6
25 December 2015 10:35 AM
slash920
General Technical
6
22 December 2015 04:46 PM



Quick Reply: Oil surge/starvation myth?



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM.