JGM Mapped Billet GT3071 Standard Position
08 November 2012, 07:20 PM
#1
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Leeds
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
JGM Mapped Billet GT3071 Standard Position
Mapped by Simon today at Area 52.....
Gt3071 Standard Position Turbo with 20% meth on a 2.0 Sti Wide track.
479.2bhp
470lbft Torque.
More than most GT3076 based standard fit units.
Simon , I thank you.
Gt3071 Standard Position Turbo with 20% meth on a 2.0 Sti Wide track.
479.2bhp
470lbft Torque.
More than most GT3076 based standard fit units.
Simon , I thank you.
why can a rotated 30 make more power than a standard position 30 or have I once again got it wrong 
08 November 2012, 08:28 PM
#6
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Leeds
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exhaust housing restrictions of standard fit turbo causes it to have less power.....
Its a new Aet Gtx3071 with Turbosmart actuator with 7cm EH.
Think its similar to a md321t but seems to be more like a 'V' for results.
Should have gone rotated but you 'live and learn'.
Its a new Aet Gtx3071 with Turbosmart actuator with 7cm EH.
Think its similar to a md321t but seems to be more like a 'V' for results.
Should have gone rotated but you 'live and learn'.
Last edited by turboturner; 08 November 2012 at 08:41 PM.
Trending Topics
08 November 2012, 09:14 PM
#8
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Leeds
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Would hope yours made a bit more mate being a built 2.1 and mine being a Sti 2.0 lump.
Last edited by turboturner; 08 November 2012 at 09:46 PM.
08 November 2012, 09:41 PM
#10
Yes is it 2.1L
There is no difference if its 2.1 or 2.5 or 2.0L,difference will be only in spool up or torque figures
Friend(Steve) running on his 2.0L T and he made 482bhp(Simon too mapped Steve car) on 18% methanol
Good figures and great torque,do you have RR graphs?
Jura
There is no difference if its 2.1 or 2.5 or 2.0L,difference will be only in spool up or torque figures
Friend(Steve) running on his 2.0L T and he made 482bhp(Simon too mapped Steve car) on 18% methanol
Good figures and great torque,do you have RR graphs?
Jura
08 November 2012, 09:54 PM
#11
Scooby Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (6)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Leeds
Posts: 490
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes is it 2.1L
There is no difference if its 2.1 or 2.5 or 2.0L,difference will be only in spool up or torque figures
Friend(Steve) running on his 2.0L T and he made 482bhp(Simon too mapped Steve car) on 18% methanol
Good figures and great torque,do you have RR graphs?
Jura
There is no difference if its 2.1 or 2.5 or 2.0L,difference will be only in spool up or torque figures
Friend(Steve) running on his 2.0L T and he made 482bhp(Simon too mapped Steve car) on 18% methanol
Good figures and great torque,do you have RR graphs?
Jura
09 November 2012, 09:12 AM
#18
[QUOTE=jura11;10861586]I would too be impressed with those figures on 2.0L 
Jura
2.0L can have some great figures look at the gobstoper that's a 2.0L
Well I hope so as I'm building a 2.0L I'm looking at we'll over 500 fingers crossed
Simon don't forget to get in touch.
Jura
2.0L can have some great figures look at the gobstoper that's a 2.0L
Well I hope so as I'm building a 2.0L I'm looking at we'll over 500 fingers crossed
Simon don't forget to get in touch.
Last edited by johnnybon; 09 November 2012 at 09:26 AM.
09 November 2012, 09:50 AM
#19
Scooby Regular
Very nice graph although those inlet air temps may have over compensated on the figures a tad though.
When AET get it right, they certainly get it right.
When AET get it right, they certainly get it right.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
28 December 2015 11:07 PM
shorty87
Wheels And Tyres For Sale
0
29 September 2015 02:18 PM
