Notices
Engine Management and ECU Remapping This section is to discuss the various aspects of engine management modification for your Subaru.

Billet SC42's fall in

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 09:39 PM
  #1  
TH3_5T1G's Avatar
TH3_5T1G
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Default Billet SC42's fall in

I'm looking to purchase a new turbo over the coming months and after seeing some results, I've been keenly leaning towards a billet SC42.

However, it seems very common for people to stick up their results when they're happy with them and it seems less common (to me anyways) for someone to do it with what they may deem 'mediocre' results.
Only have to look at the crowds that went on to buy the Mdx321t's for a 2.0 only to find a lot of people didn't achieve what was expected. I know there's always more to it than just the turbo but some people had good specs otherwise.

So if all you guys reading that are running a billet SC42 would very kindly post figures, graphs, bum dyno results or even just your own personal opinion/review on it, it would be very much appreciated. Again, I know there are a lot on the 'Scoobyclinic Billet' thread but can't help feel that they may be somewhat favoured. Anyways, thanks for reading and I look forward to any replies
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 09:42 PM
  #2  
Fai17's Avatar
Fai17
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,447
Likes: 0
From: MY 10s blobeye 10.87@132 2.35/TO4Z next
Default

Subscribed.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 10:06 PM
  #3  
Tidgy's Avatar
Tidgy
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 23,118
Likes: 150
From: Notts
Default

dont forget it has had alot of upgrades over time, latest one being sc42+
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2014 | 10:07 PM
  #4  
TH3_5T1G's Avatar
TH3_5T1G
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Default

And hopefully there'll be a few out there running them that are willing to share their views
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 06:28 PM
  #5  
TH3_5T1G's Avatar
TH3_5T1G
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Default

Anybody? Could be very constructive for those in two minds
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 06:57 PM
  #6  
kevfawcett's Avatar
kevfawcett
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 1
Default

On a blob STi mine made 410bhp and 360lb/ft it is a little bit laggy for a lot of people but I only ever drive it hard on track where it's on boost anyway. I was expecting a bit more power though tbh
Other mods;
Gt spec 2 headers and uppipe
850cc injectors
Silicone intake
3port boost solenoid
3" downpipe and exhaust
fmic
aem intake
Remapped by Duncan Graham
and probably a couple of other bits I've forgotten

Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 07:00 PM
  #7  
TH3_5T1G's Avatar
TH3_5T1G
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Default

Many thanks for being the first to upload. Its still not to be sniffed at

Are you running an ECUtek remap or aftermarket unit? Can you recall when you purchased the turbo?
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 07:55 PM
  #8  
Ginola's Avatar
Ginola
Scooby Regular
15 Year Member
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,326
Likes: 2
From: Drinking Coffee somewhere.
Default

I have just taken the plunge and ordered an MD321T so on the opposite side of this equation a little I guess. After speaking to a few people this is the route I've chosen.

I'm not really too worried about numbers on a piece of paper more over how the car drives and feels on track (this is where the car gets pushed hard) hopefully the numbers will be reasonable!
From what I have read and been told both the 321T and SC42 like to run a fair amount of boost, so on a standard engine this might be a bit of a worry, but pushed up on a built engine at 1.7/1.8 bar with a drop of meth thrown in I believe they both make really nice power.

Looking forward to seeing which route you take and your results/findings
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 08:34 PM
  #9  
kevfawcett's Avatar
kevfawcett
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 1
Default

Originally Posted by TH3_5T1G
Many thanks for being the first to upload. Its still not to be sniffed at

Are you running an ECUtek remap or aftermarket unit? Can you recall when you purchased the turbo?
ECUtek remap and turbo was bought about 14months ago
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2014 | 11:28 PM
  #10  
MartynJ's Avatar
MartynJ
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,629
Likes: 3
From: Enginetuner Plymouth for 4wd RR Mapping Apexi Ecutek Alcatek Proper Garage More than just a laptop!
Default





Both Classics fitted with our 2.1 stroker engines and supporting mods !
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2014 | 04:27 AM
  #11  
chet123's Avatar
chet123
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: London
Default

Originally Posted by Ginola
I have just taken the plunge and ordered an MD321T so on the opposite side of this equation a little I guess. After speaking to a few people this is the route I've chosen.

I'm not really too worried about numbers on a piece of paper more over how the car drives and feels on track (this is where the car gets pushed hard) hopefully the numbers will be reasonable!
From what I have read and been told both the 321T and SC42 like to run a fair amount of boost, so on a standard engine this might be a bit of a worry, but pushed up on a built engine at 1.7/1.8 bar with a drop of meth thrown in I believe they both make really nice power.

Looking forward to seeing which route you take and your results/findings
similar to Ginola I've chosen to go with a md321h mostly because of its spool and torque characteristics on 2ltr.
Awaiting delivery and fitting then mapping.
That said the sc42 are of same caliber and a proven turbo.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2014 | 10:58 PM
  #12  
TH3_5T1G's Avatar
TH3_5T1G
Thread Starter
Scooby Regular
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,305
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere halfway between heaven and hell, some call it earth!
Default

Martyn, the 2.1's clearly making far more torque than the 2.0 but do they necessarily make more bhp? And judging by the dates, they're both fairly old units too?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
28
Dec 28, 2015 11:07 PM
Ganz1983
Subaru
5
Oct 2, 2015 09:22 AM
LostUser
Non Scooby Related
11
Sep 29, 2015 11:00 AM
techdw
ScoobyNet General
12
Sep 28, 2015 07:09 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 PM.