Notices
Drivetrain Gearbox, Diffs & Driveshafts etc

Ecutec Tek 2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 24, 2002 | 01:42 PM
  #1  
Steel Blue's Avatar
Steel Blue
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Question

After several visits to those helpful (and persuasive !) guys at Power Engineering, I tried out the Tek 2 in place of a Prodrive ECU on my '99 car which is unmodded except Prodrive backbox and PE downpipe and sports cat centre section.
Overall performance was improved but the most dramatic effect was on low speed driveability, seemingly improving torque significantly (not tested on dyno)- most noticeable when going back to the Prodrive ECU which feels strangled in comparison.
In short I am imprssed and very tempted but have some reservations.
Firstly and most importantly, can anyone advise the likely effect on engine longevity ? (I will travel to europe and be at the mercy of available fuel and I do the occasional track day, if that makes a difference)
Secondly, any ideas on fuel consumption - during my trial it worsened but that was possibly because I was enjoying myself too much so driving was not representative of my average journey ?
I would be very interested to hear of anyone else's experiences.
Thanks
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 01:49 PM
  #2  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post

Cruise fuel consumption should be no worse (uses closed loop lambda control), but with more power and torque you will enjoy yourself more, so use more fuel.

Safety: it retains the original ECU low octane fuel and ignition maps and compensation maps so can pull things right back.

It spools up better because of the attention given to timing, fuelling and boost duty cycles in the spool up area. In fact in this area ADDING fuel helps enormously.

From the logs I have done it seems to be just as safe as the PPP map - if not safer in some areas where the PPP runs excessive amounts of ignition advance and routinely retards it. The Tek 2 is more conservative in these areas - does not make it slower because the PPP has to remove timing in these areas frequently.
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 01:52 PM
  #3  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Post

I've found that fuel consumption actually improves if a long journey (i.e. constantish speed), presumably 'cos they've leaned out higher up, or maybe it's just me!
Engine longevity - boost pressure is actually pretty much the same as on the PPP, so shouldn't make much difference there! Clever stuff is done with timing which is how more power is gained (on top of boost being upped to PPP levels).
The 'low quality fuel' map is identical on the normal map & Tek2 map, so putting junk in will only have the same detrimental effects as it does on the engine usually!
The lower down torque is 'cos they've richened up the mixture down there - it does make a huge difference! I had a pre-low-down-richened Tek2 before the update and the difference was pretty huge!
So... I hope that calms your fears. The whole thing IMHO is about as safe as you cn get - I believe that the PPP doesn't actually handle bad fuel as well as the Tek changes anyway.
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 01:55 PM
  #4  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Post

Sorry - posted at the same time as John! Seem to be saying the same things, though, or thereabouts...
Maybe I should launch into trying to flog the things as well
Happy customer strikes again...
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 01:59 PM
  #5  
john banks's Avatar
john banks
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 18,658
Likes: 1
From: 32 cylinders and many cats
Post



I made two happy customers yesterday with ECU Scotland custom map or whatever I feel like calling it at the time One in a rush to get it done before a long driving weekend Great fun seeing them smile when they put the foot down

[Edited by john banks - 5/24/2002 2:01:10 PM]
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 02:12 PM
  #6  
Steel Blue's Avatar
Steel Blue
Thread Starter
Scooby Newbie
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Thumbs up

Thanks guys, can feel my wallet strings being loosened I speak/type !!
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 03:05 PM
  #7  
ScoobySnack's Avatar
ScoobySnack
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire
Post

Just to confirm the above..........

Have now done just over 4000miles with no problems yet...........

I will be upgrading my hoses soon as a precaution, if I can find someone who has them and can do it for me.

J
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 05:46 PM
  #8  
Flat 4x4's Avatar
Flat 4x4
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
Post

I know that the RB5 PPP has "upgraded intercooler piping", but does that mean its necessary with a Tek2 ?

And, same question - what are the parts that are needed / £cost?


Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 05:47 PM
  #9  
Flat 4x4's Avatar
Flat 4x4
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 1,867
Likes: 0
Post

(following on from SteelBlues questions)
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 06:18 PM
  #10  
nom's Avatar
nom
Scooby Senior
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,602
Likes: 0
Post

Not sure what parts you're referring to (!), but the Tek2 effectively doesn't require any & is £500, the hoses are about £60 if you look about a bit, and the normal tube kit replaces the stuff around the intercooler (without getting complicated!) - 3 tubes, 2 simple & one splitter type thing under the intercooler.
The tubes would be needed for the upped boost. It's guessed (by MRT in this case, I think), that the standard tubes can only cope with up to 16psi. As the Tek2 & PPP go over this, it makes sense to upgrade the tubes. There's no performance increase, justless of a likelihood that the tubes burst! And they look pretty too...
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 06:37 PM
  #11  
ScoobySnack's Avatar
ScoobySnack
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,569
Likes: 0
From: Cheshire
Post

Thanks Nom , thats exactly what I was assuming .

Anyone want some business in the Bracknell area to fit them on me car?????????

J

Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 10:45 PM
  #12  
PING's Avatar
PING
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Wink

Scoobysnack,

If you find someone, let me know ... seems to make a lot of sense!

Steve
Reply
Old May 24, 2002 | 11:01 PM
  #13  
Scott W's Avatar
Scott W
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 3,288
Likes: 0
Wink

J - apparently it's an easy job and you can do it yourself quite quickly! I haven't done it myself, but know of people who have and they normally stay clear of all things engine bay related!
Reply
Old May 25, 2002 | 07:14 AM
  #14  
Iain P's Avatar
Iain P
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Sep 1999
Posts: 676
Likes: 1
Post

Replacing the Y-section intercooler pipe does make a noticeable improvement to the flow restriction. When you take the old part off you can see how bad it is for flow. It is worth doing this mod even if you don't do anything else.
Reply
Old May 27, 2002 | 10:39 AM
  #15  
BL's Avatar
BL
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,687
Likes: 0
Post

Hoe much is this TEK2 installed???
Reply
Old May 27, 2002 | 11:01 AM
  #16  
PING's Avatar
PING
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Cool

BL,

Take a look at

www.ecutek.co.uk

It has all the info there ... well worth it!

Steve
Reply
Old May 27, 2002 | 01:13 PM
  #17  
Nezz10's Avatar
Nezz10
Scooby Regular
 
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 1
Post

I am selling my TEK2 if anyone is interested.

See the 'For Sale' section for more info.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Mattybr5@MB Developments
Full Cars Breaking For Spares
34
Nov 7, 2024 04:10 PM
Scotsman
Drivetrain
15
Aug 22, 2002 08:30 PM
scottdg
General Technical
6
Jun 15, 2002 09:09 AM




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 AM.