BuRR

Which is best? and why?

john banks

You will get arguments either way. I have not tried Millers. Many rate it. NF claim a higher octane increase for the same price, and the ability to add more (up to 5ml/L) for a greater (although diminishing return) increase. I have been using NF for a month or two now, and it runs smoother, and makes me more confident to run a bit more boost. I'm happy enough that I won't be trying Millers. NF comes in a 300ml bottle for about £13 which treats 300 litres at the starting does of 1ml/Litre which typically gives you a gain of about 2 RON with SUL. So it is more concentrated but you have to meausure it out. I have a small (urine sample container but one of the better ones ! - I am a doc) container which handily is about 50 ml which is usually my fill up volume.

tweenierob

where can i buy nf??????
Cheers
Rob

Cosie Convert

Shock -Doc adds Urine to fuel and gets dose of the RON's

Triple X

iTrader: (1)

Whats best? Using Shell Optimax which im led to believe already has octane booster in or adding booster into super unleaded? I suppose there wont be much in it but wouldnt it work out cheaper to use optimax?

Matt Churchill

Triple X - do BOTH!

nitro

If you are using 98 then i suggest between 0.75 of a ml to 1 ml per litre.
96 i would suggest the 2 mls and these amounts are the ones if you want to go RACING.
These will give you the best performance and value for money on a STD WRX.
Im not sure if you have read these results but here they are.
95 octane 99kw @ the wheels
95 " plus 1 ml per litre gained 6 kw @ the wheels.
95 " 2 mls 9 kw
95 " 5 mls 7 kw
and shell racing 100 octane gained 1 kw @ the wheels.
Hope this helps.
It seems to be that 99.5 octane gives the best results.ON STD CARS.
If your using more boost then its a pro-rata thing )

LG John

Not heard of this NF stuff but I like a pint of Miller myself

dingy

http://www.nitrousformula.co.uk

I have tried loads of Octane Booster's

Then became the UK importer for NF.

So work that out for yourselves